Judge Napolitano Vindicated. Obama Used British Intelligence To Spy On Trump. I Am Outraged: Susan Rice Cleared!

by Pamela Williams
 
Judge Napolitano spoke out about a secret truth he knew, but FOX NEWS fired him anyway!  Instead of taking his word for it, they walked him out the door.  That was a sad picture, and I am so happy he is back.  Most of us  know the Judge is one of the most honorable and most trustworthy people in the world.  I hope FOX learned a lesson and will respect Napolitano for his honesty and legal expertise.
In March, Napolitano claimed President Obama went outside of American chain-of-command to British Intelligence to spy on Trump and his Transition Team.  When Trump saw that Napolitano believed this, he trusted it as truth.  So we heard of the theory, but no one seemed to believe it or back it up.  
This was Napolitano’s comment:
“Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command. He didn’t use the NSA. He didn’t use the CIA. He didn’t use the FBI, and he didn’t use Department of Justice. He used GCHQ. What the heck is GCHQ? That’s the initials for the British spying agency. They have 24/7 access to the NSA database. So by simply having two people go to them saying, ‘President Obama needs transcripts of conversations involving candidate Trump, conversations involving president-elect Trump,’ he’s able to get it, and there’s no American fingerprints on this.”
 
The below comment was made by CNN:
British and other European intelligence agencies intercepted communications between associates of Donald Trump and Russian officials and other Russian individuals during the campaign and passed on those communications to their US counterparts, US congressional and law enforcement and US and European intelligence sources tell CNN.
The communications were captured during routine surveillance of Russian officials and other Russians known to western intelligence. British and European intelligence agencies, including GCHQ, the British intelligence agency responsible for communications surveillance, were not proactively targeting members of the Trump team but rather picked up these communications during what’s known as “incidental collection,” these sources tell CNN.
The European intelligence agencies detected multiple communications over several months between the Trump associates and Russian individuals — and passed on that intelligence to the US. The US and Britain are part of the so-called “Five Eyes” agreement (along with Canada, Australia and New Zealand), which calls for open sharing among member nations of a broad range of intelligence.

Published on Mar 14, 2017
“Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command. He didn’t use the NSA. He didn’t use the CIA. He didn’t use the FBI, and he didn’t use Department of Justice. He used GCHQ. What the heck is GCHQ? That’s the initials for the British spying agency. They have 24/7 access to the NSA database. So by simply having two people go to them saying, ‘President Obama needs transcripts of conversations involving candidate Trump, conversations involving president-elect Trump,’ he’s able to get it, and there’s no American fingerprints on this.” – Judge Andrew Napolitano  
 
Next, we remember that the Judge said if the Intelligence was gotten through the British, there would be no fingerprints.  So I am thinking that Obama will get out of this without being charged…unless he is a part of the unmasking.  The unmasking is where the crime was committed.  If the unmasking of the name of an American citizen is done through surveillance, and it is widely disseminated through a network, that is a felony with a 10 year jail sentence.  Remember Dr. Evelyn Farcas, who said on live TV that those who had that intelligence on Trump and his Team spread it to the Hill, because they wanted it to get out.  It is hard to believe they were unaware of the fact that could get them charged with a felony carrying a 10 year jail sentence.
 
Now, we go to the Susan Rice Investigation, which I have found conflicting reports.  Since we have had war on our minds, we have forgotten about Susan Rice to an extent.  Lets look at our first report.
 
I was shocked to see this healine:  Susan Rice Is Cleared!  It Is Time To Shine The Spotlight Back Where It Belongs.  WHAT?  No way!  It goes on to say, the right wing attack on Susan Rice is part of a broader distraction from the activities of Ezra Cohen-Watnick.
This is being reported by CNN:
After a review of the same intelligence reports brought to light by House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes, both Republican and Democratic lawmakers and aides have so far found no evidence that Obama administration officials did anything unusual or illegal, multiple sources in both parties tell CNN.
Their private assessment contradicts President Donald Trump’s allegations that former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice broke the law by requesting the “unmasking” of US individuals’ identities. Trump had claimed the matter was a “massive story.”…
One congressional intelligence source described the requests made by Rice as “normal and appropriate” for officials who serve in that role to the president.
 
Oh, I am outraged.  While we were engaged in war issues Susan Rice was CLEARED!  Susan Rice has been cleared of doing anything illegal or inappropriate by both Democrats and Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee.  How can this be possible?  Now they are saying it is time to shine the spotlight on Rep. Nunes and his buddy in the White House Ezra Cohen-Watnick.  YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!
As the story goes, if you can keep it straight….Cohen-Watnick was the one who called  Nunes to a  meeting at the White House to review the “evidence” he had uncovered that some of Trump’s associates had their communication with foreign targets collected incidentally. Cohen-Watnick had been reviewing the “unmasking” procedures used during the Obama administration.
Cohen-Watnick shared the information with Devin Nunes.  Nunes talked about it with the press, shared it with Trump, but he decided against sharing it with the Intelligence Committee. Who could blame him…who could he trust there?  Nunes ended up recusing himself from the Committee, and now we find that the Committee found Susan Rice not guilty of anything!
 
Source:  washingtonmonthly.com/2017/04/13/susan-rice-is-cleared-its-time-to-shine-the-spotlight-back-where-it-belongs/
 
Lets go on to the next opinion of the Susan Rice case by JUDICIAL WATCH.  
The head of the conservative-leaning government accountability group Judicial Watch is calling for former President Barack Obama’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice to be brought before a grand jury to testify under oath — and under penalty of law — about allegedly spying on President Donald Trump’s transition team.
Tom Fitton told Fox News that Americans will know investigators are serious about getting to the bottom of the scandal only if there’s a criminal penalty to be paid for this “abuse of power”:
“If she is going to be called as a witness, I would suggest the focus be on getting a grand jury going and having her testify before a grand jury. That would show that we’re actually serious about investigating this unprecedented violation and abuse of power by a president and his appointees.”
Rice has been accused of using information obtained from the legal collection of surveillance reports to “unmask” — out — the names of Trump administration officials mentioned in them and using the information for political purposes. Fitton said this would constitute illegal activity:
“If she was accessing this material and using it for improper purposes, there are all sorts of criminal laws that would have been violated.”
Fitton also told Fox News that he believes Rice broke U.S. privacy laws by improperly using the information in a move that is straight out of the Watergate playbook.
Fitton invoked the question asked by Senator Howard Baker during the Watergate probe:
“I don’t know what President Obama knew and when he knew it. I highlighted the fact that he could still be impeached […] there has got to be accountability for President Obama.”
Fitton told Fox News that the misuse of surveillance intelligence could also mean prison time for Rice.
 
It appears to me the Intelligence Committee found Rice innocent of wrongdoing, but there still maybe a hearing on Capitol Hill to investigate this whole matter.  There had better be, because Rice IS GUILTY, AND DESERVES TO BE FOUND AS SUCH.  AGAIN…the unmasking of an American citizen widely disseminated throughout a network carries a 10 year jail term as a felony.
 
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC6JND3Wl20

Related Posts:

If everyone who reads our story, who likes it, helps fund it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as $10, you can support the IWB – and it only takes a minute. Thank you. 2,149 views