by QuartzPuffyStar
A recent post about a Veteran journalist fired after criticizing 5G and questioning it’s safety cached my attention, and it seemed quite weird that the mentioned article was removed so fast and the journalist was dismissed because of it…. it doesn´t have anything that could be taken seriously or could harm the industry if they really want to use the technology….
So, I went into the links the article offers, and here I found something interesting.
The Active Denial System will support a full spectrum of operations ranging from non-lethal methods of crowd control, crowd dispersal, convoy and patrol protection, checkpoint security, perimeter security, area denial, and port protection, as well as other defensive and offensive operations from both fixed-site or mobile platforms.
The Active Denial System is an advanced, long-range non-lethal, directed energy, counter-personnel capability that projects a man-sized (1.5 m) beam of millimeter waves (not microwaves) at a range up to 1,000 meters. It will have the same compelling non-lethal effect on all human targets, regardless of size, age and gender.
Immediately after reading this, I remembered some weird “towers” that were being installed around the country….
In any case, even if these towers aren´t in any way related to this 5G thing.
I think that the gov Idea is to use 5G as an excuse to fill the cities with this Active Denial System hotspots, that would enable them to have a very good crowd (or individual person, I don´t know how precise this thing is) control in the cities that will have no equal in history.
Just imagine having the capability of stopping any protest, or civil unrest, or even a person through internet, without the need of risking anyone in the real world! Plus, we don´t know which are the limits for this technology. Maybe it could even kill people indirectly causing strokes or heart attacks immediately, or even cause mid to long term effects that could in any way negatively affect the people of an area, probably killing them….
The article was giving a negative gateway to this technology main target application, which could make some people nervous about the issue and rise an alarm and taking political action against it. So it had to be taken out ASAP and any risk of republishing should had to be minimized.