by UPFINA
The recent action in markets and the projections from investment banks show there is complacency about the expected economic growth acceleration in 2020. It has become a mainstream thesis as prognosticators have followed the price action. In theory, they are supposed to predict markets, but that’s difficult. Many have played catch-up in the past few weeks driving stocks to new record highs.
As you can see from the chart below, there has been a big decrease in the 21 day moving average of the equity only put to call ratio.
Froth also means protection is cheap. $SPX $RUT $VIX t.co/7qr1m9ZQkh pic.twitter.com/09O0jf8GwL
— hedgopia (@hedgopia) November 18, 2019
The arrow points to the peak euphoria in this expansion which was in January 2018. As of Friday, the 14 day relative strength of the S&P 500 hit 74.82 which is the highest point of the year. This index has only hit 80 or above twice in the past 10 years. Unsurprisingly, the 10 year peak is in January 2018. The major difference between January 2018 and now is that was the end of the cyclical expansion, while currently we are expected supposedly to be at the beginning of one. 2017 was a global synchronized cyclical expansion, while 2019 was mostly a slowdown.
Investment Banks Follow The Price Action
As we mentioned, investment banks have gotten on board with the price action. Credit Suisse initiated a 2020 S&P 500 target of 3,425 which represents 9.8% upside. The firm expects stocks to rally on multiple expansion and a “reversal of decelerating economics.” That’s a very fancy way of saying increased optimism and growth acceleration. It’s difficult to expect increased optimism following a year where the S&P 500 has risen almost 25%. The firm expects industrial production growth to bottom this quarter.
This thinking explains why stocks ignored the bad October industrial production report. If the consensus is that Q4 is going to be terrible and 2020 is going to show improvement, no one will care about October’s industrial production report. The 3 month moving average of the percentage of manufacturing sectors in contraction is the highest of this expansion. This manufacturing recession is wider, but not as deep as the last one. Credit Suisse recommends buying financials, industrials, materials, and energy; it recommends going underweight staples, utilities, REITs, and communications.
Similarly, Goldman Sachs expects cyclicals to outperform the market because of the economic rebound. This is basically a recount of what has happened rather than a prediction as the S&P 500 is up 8% in the past 3 months and cyclicals are up 12%. The firm recommends CBS, Snap-On, Kohl’s, Urban Outfitters, and TCF Financials among others. One of the principal reasons for optimism is the expectation that rate cuts start to help the economy after 3 quarters. That implies there will be a positive impact in Q2 and Q3 2020.
Aruoba-Diebold-Scotti Business Conditions Index
The ADS business conditions index shows the economy is on the precipice of a recession. As you can see from the chart below, as of November 9th the index was at -0.683. Anything at or below -0.8 is consistent with a recession.
A near-recession warning via the Philly Fed's ADS Index. Newly released revised data for this business cycle index is now showing a sharp deterioration in the US macro trend: a drop to -0.68, close to the -0.80 tipping point that signals recession: t.co/EMrD697EXh pic.twitter.com/7Oh9YVSPs9
— James Picerno (@jpicerno) November 17, 2019
The 2001 recession was the smallest recessionary decline. The 2008 recession had the 2nd worst recessionary decline. The good news is the index has increased in the past 3 weeks as it bottomed at -0.783 on October 22nd. That’s dangerously close to a recession. The bad news is the October data was pushed lower by the latest industrial production report which came out in November. The November index could be revised to be recessionary if the next industrial production report is weak.
This period of weakness is very close to the troughs seen in the prior 2 weak periods in this expansion. James Picerno filtered this index through a probit model which shows there is a 23% chance of a recession. The peak was above 30% in October. The previous 2 slowdowns had similar peaks.
ECRI Index Improves & Cass Freight Signals Weakness
The good news is the ECRI leading index is improving. In the week of November 8th, the index improved from 145.6 to 146.2 which boosted the growth rate from -0.4% to 0.4%. On the one hand, this index doesn’t signal a further slowdown in 2020. On the other hand, it doesn’t see a major growth acceleration that the optimists see.
ECRI U.S. Weekly Leading Index growth rose to 0.4%. Read more and download ECRI WLI data for free here: t.co/TWvYFpSPmb pic.twitter.com/GBeE5pqyxa
— Lakshman Achuthan (@businesscycle) November 15, 2019
On the negative side, the Cass Freight index signaled the slowdown continued in October. The shipments index was down 5.9% yearly and the 2 year growth stack was -0.1%. So much for tough comps driving weak growth. The expenditures index was down 4.1% yearly, while the 2 year growth stack was still 7.4%. Cass Information Systems still predicts negative GDP growth by the end of the year. The latest direction of the Q4 GDP tracking estimates is consistent with this projection.
Temporary Staffing Implies Greatest Slowdown Of Expansion
Temporary staffing is highly reactive to strength of the economy. While businesses will think twice about laying off workers, they don’t worry about lowering demand for temporary staffing. Temporary staffing demand is a great signal for business conditions.
Temp Staffing Demand pic.twitter.com/jhcwXtL2vR
— Don Draper (@DonDraperClone) November 13, 2019
As you can see from the chart above, the current 4 week average of yearly growth in staffing demand is below the trough in the 2015-2016. This is one of the signals that implies this is the worst slowdown of this expansion. The yearly growth in temporary help services in October was -0.2% which is the lowest reading since December 2016 which was the trough of the last slowdown which had growth of -1.2%. Growth went negative 8 months before the last recession and 3 months before the 2001 recession. Prior to the last slowdown, this index had never gone negative without a recession occurring right afterwards or right before. The data starts in 1991.