Note: The slide in this article’s thumbnail comes from this study of 1006 patients who developed symptoms after spike protein vaccination, of which 948 (94%) had abnormal blood. 12 of those who developed abnormal blood were also examined prior to vaccination and had normal blood prior to vaccination.
In today’s article, I will discuss the critical information and logical errors underlying a few of the key COVID-19 controversies. To lay the foundation for doing this, I devoted the first half of this series, to discussing many of the common errors in critical thinking I’ve observed throughout our society that our academic community has failed to correct and instead has reinforced. These issues are particularly problematic within the medical field and I would highly recommend reading the first part of this series so you can appreciate the context behind today’s article.
Pseudoscience is a loaded term that is typically used to disparage any type of alternative viewpoint. Because of the inherent uncertainty in what constitutes an objective basis for its definition (as “pseudoscience” typically ends up characterizing whatever challenges the current orthodoxy), a variety of definitions have been proposed. At this point, the most universally agreed upon definition is that any belief which cannot be scientifically disproven (thereby “unfalsifiable”) constitutes pseudoscience, and this a subject I used the questioning of COVID-19’s existence to highlight.
A great challenge with Western Medicine (especially with vaccines), is that it behaves as an unfalsifiable ideology that no amount of failures can disprove. For example, by all objective metrics, the COVID-19 vaccines have failed and are either useless or have made COVID-19 worse, yet despite this, the majority of elected officials are still insisting the vaccines are essential and many institutions are still mandating them.
amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/critical-thinking-in-the-age-of-censorship