The disturbing truth about ‘safe’ vaccines for mothers-to-be

‘SAFE and effective’ is a slogan indelibly imprinted on our brains. It was applied, of course, to the novel mRNA vaccines, released globally in early 2021 to protect us against Covid-19. We were told they were ‘experimental’ but encouraged to take them; ‘coerced’ may be a better word.

Public health authorities were soon recommending the injections to pregnant women, despite their experimental status and lack of long-term safety data, and no studies having been conducted on mothers-to-be. This always felt risky bearing in mind that pregnant women are supposed not to eat certain types of fish, or even unpasteurised cheese. TCW raised the concern in April 2021, but governments pressed ahead.

Pregnant women in Australia had little choice but to trust their regulatory agencies and health authorities, and those who refused the injection were told they would lose their jobs. Remember the phrase ‘no jab, no job’? Women assumed the jabs would not have been approved had the safety evidence been unclear. What they were not told is that Pfizer tested three versions of its jab on pregnant rats and the version with the highest failed pregnancy rate was the one given an emergency use licence!

We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!

Pfizer’s data indicate that the vaccinated group suffered DOUBLE the number of failed pregnancies compared with the unvaccinated group, a higher number of congenital deformities, and trials showed the vaccine migrated to the ovaries.

www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-disturbing-truth-about-safe-vaccines-for-mothers-to-be/

Views:

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.