🔔ROUND 1🔔
Ansolabehere claims that @MattBraynard's report never mentions what fields (other than ‘date of birth’) he used in his matching methodology…Ansolabehere is either lying or illiterate, because Braynard explicitly states (several times) the specific fields he used pic.twitter.com/MXr92TNTWU
— The Panda Tribune (@PandaTribune) December 7, 2020
🔔ROUND 2 Continued🔔
In fact… the report Ansolabehere cites as a supporting source for his claim… actually RECOMMENDS using nationally available lists, and even specifically mentions the U.S. Postal Service database (NCOA), which @MattBraynard used, as an example! pic.twitter.com/gJYs3yOSi5— The Panda Tribune (@PandaTribune) December 7, 2020
Extra Bonus…
In ANOTHER published paper authored by Stephen Ansolabehere he writes:
"Even just two pieces—either Name & Date of Birth or Name & Address—identifies nearly all individuals in a database uniquely. 99.6% are unique w/ DoB & Name, 99% are unique w/ Name & Address" pic.twitter.com/NkPQg0xRgD— The Panda Tribune (@PandaTribune) December 7, 2020
For example,
Ansolabehere claims that Matt Braynard’s report never mentions what fields (other than ‘date of birth’) he used in his matching methodology…
Ansolabehere is either lying or illiterate, because Braynard explicitly states (several times) the specific fields he used
Matt Braynard has brought some of the more compelling evidence to the table in this entire fiasco…it’s not surprising that the Dems/Rinos put up such a weak effort.
h/t axolotl_peyotl