Australia Rules That Sites Can be Held Legally Responsible for Public Comments Sections

Sharing is Caring!

by Chris Black

This is the beginning of the end for Aussies. Without free speech, there’s no freedom, and now they’re moving to shut down public forums on the internet. All you’ll have left is the official propaganda, just like in Soviet Russia, North Korea or China. No website that allows reader feedback or community participation can survive being held responsible for every comment posted.


Australian media companies could be liable for third-party comments made on their social media posts after the High Court upheld a ruling on a case by a formerly imprisoned teen who sued media companies over comments about him.

The five-two decision on Wednesday creates a precedent applying to Australian media companies, which potentially makes them liable as publishers of comments from social media users as though they made the statements themselves.

The ruling comes after an appeal by Nine Entertainment and News Corp in relation to the case of Dylan Voller, who in 2016 was filmed suffering cruel treatment in a Northern Territory prison.

The footage of Voller was posted online by Australian outlets and attracted comments which he claimed were defamatory. Voller sued the Australian, Sydney Morning Herald (now owned by Nine Entertainment), and News Corp’s Sky News Australia for the comments, claiming the outlets were responsible for the third party inputs, sparking a four-year legal battle.

See also  Australia is so woke that members of parliament are now describing any woman who opposes trans ideology as a “TERD.”

The defending media companies argued that they couldn’t be considered publishers of their readers’ comments.

However, the majority of the Court held that the liability of a “publisher” depends upon whether they, by “facilitating and encouraging” the relevant communication, “participated” in the communication of the defamatory matter.

Media companies, “by the creation of a public Facebook page and the posting of content on that page, facilitated, encouraged and thereby assisted the publication of comments from third-party Facebook users,” reads the ruling. It concludes that the news companies were, therefore, the “publishers of the third-party comments.”

The ruling opens the door for Voller to pursue the outlets’ parent companies for defamation.

In the dissenting opinion, Justice Steward argued that companies posting to Facebook “starts an electronic conversation” that could spark “thousands of comments from around the world.” He added that the companies would have “no actual means of controlling the contents of such comment”.

See also  Turnaround Jay! One Small Rate Hike Expected In May, Then A Turnaround With Fed Rate Cuts To 4.28% (Too Bad Taylor Rules Calls For A Target Rate Of 10.29%)

Views: 33

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.