Do Democrats now intend to never allow the opposition to govern without constant obstruction and harassment by any means necessary?
What result do they expect in response to this? Surrender to unlimited Democrat Rule?
Reagan was the monster. Bush was the monster. W. was the evil idiot monster. Now Trump and they are gone insane.
Where can we go from here?
Just on my newsfeed…more crap from Democrats! They never stop.
Lawyers for the House of Representatives revealed on Monday that they have reason to believe that the grand-jury redactions in special counsel Robert Mueller’s report show that President Donald Trump lied about his knowledge of his campaign’s contacts with WikiLeaks.
“As Benjamin Franklin departed the Constitutional Convention, he was asked if the framers had created a monarchy or a republic. “A republic,” he famously replied, and then added, “if you can keep it.”
The remarkable generation that founded this nation led an improbable yet successful revolution against the strongest military power of the time. They declared their independence based on self-evident truths, asserting a new basis of political rule in the sovereignty of the people and launching an experiment in self-government. Through a carefully written constitution that limits power and secures rights while allowing for change through its own amendment, they created an enduring framework of republican government that bestows upon their posterity the same blessings of liberty.
But what the American Founders did not do-could not do-was guarantee the success of their creation. Franklin and the other Founders knew that their experiment depended on future generations, which meant the education of future citizens. “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization,” Thomas Jefferson once warned, “it expects what never was-and never will be.”
How are we doing?”
www.heritage.org/political-process/commentary/ed070302b-republic-if-you-can-keep-it
Pelosi’s Dec 2018 Rule Changes Block Repubs From Participating In Impeachmen
…Process
In December 2018, the soon-to-be Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, was busy making changes in the House rules for the incoming 116th Congress. She was actually setting the stage for her anticipated impeachment of President Trump. At the time, The Conservative Treehouse’s “Sundance” wrote, “Remember when we warned [November 8th, 2018] that a convergence of left-wing groups, activists, DNC donors and specifically the Lawfare team, would align with (and meet) incoming Democrat leadership to construct a road-map for the “resistance” priorities? Well, exactly that planned and coordinated outcome is visible as incoming Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi presents her new rules for the 116th congress.”
(Note: Sundance points out the details of the relevant rules changes here.)
House Democrats are currently using those new rules to subvert historic processes and prepare the articles of impeachment.
Although impeachment is rare, on the few occasions one has been initiated, a full house vote has been taken. However, this is not mandatory. Pelosi has not held a full house vote and there’s a reason for that. A formal vote would give the minority enforceable rights. Without a full vote, the articles of impeachment “can be drawn up without any participation by the minority. This was always the plan that was visible in Pelosi’s changed House rules.”
…
ICIG Admits it Changed Whistleblower Rules BECAUSE of the Anti-Trump Complaint
“SHUT UP,” SHE EXPLAINED: Kamala Harris: Trump’s Twitter Account Should Be Suspended.
AC