French court finds Monsanto guilty of poisoning farmer: Monsanto knew weedkiller was dangerous but label lacked warning

Sharing is Caring!

by axolotl_peyotl

Lasso, a weedkiller produced by Monsanto, has been determined by a court to have caused a French farmer to experience neurological damage. In addition, the company provided inadequate warning labels on the product itself.

This is the tip of the iceberg. Monsanto (now owned by Bayer), has gotten away with crimes against humanity for far too long.

via theguardian:


A French appeals court has said US chemicals giant Monsanto was guilty of poisoning a farmer who said he suffered neurological damage after accidentally inhaling fumes from a weedkiller made by the company.

Paul François, a cereal farmer, had already won previous lawsuits against Monsanto, which was bought by Germany’s Bayer last year, in 2012 and 2015.

See also  Biden OFFICIALLY Loses Court Appeal Vs Texas Heartbeat Law! But His Admin Plans To TRY AGAIN.

He said he fell ill in 2004 after being exposed to Lasso, a weedkiller containing monochlorobenzene that was legal in France until 2007 but had already been banned in 1985 in Canada and in 1992 in Belgium and Britain.

François argued that Monsanto was aware of Lasso’s dangers long before it was withdrawn from the French market and sought damages of more than €1m (£860,000) for chronic neurological damage that led to long hospital stays.

The court in Lyon rejected the company’s appeal on Tuesday but did not rule on how much Monsanto might have to pay, which will be determined in a separate ruling. It ordered the company to pay €50,000 immediately for François’s legal fees.

See also  "Am I going to have to F%#%#-ing throw down w/this b*tch?" Geneva H.S. French teacher posts Tik-Tok rant against grandmother for not wearing properly

In its ruling, the court found that Monsanto should have clearly indicated on Lasso’s labelling and instructions for use “a notice on the specific dangers of using the product in vats and reservoirs”.

“The plaintiff’s assumed technical knowledge does not excuse the lack of information on the product and its harmful effects – a farmer is not a chemist,” it added.

Speaking after the verdict, a lawyer for Monsanto France, Jean-Daniel Bretzner, said the company would probably appeal, since the ruling applied to Lasso’s producer – in this case, Monsanto Europe.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.