Heath Tarbert to move from CFTC straight to Citadel Securities

Sharing is Caring!

by ReeAll

Heath Tarbert was a chairman of Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) till January 21 2021, when he stepped down to continue as commissioner. Now he is going straight to Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer, effective April 5 2021 as published by Bloomberg.

Bloomberg article

What is CFTC and what do they do? CFTC is the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and “… is an independent agency of the US government created in 1974, that regulates the U.S. derivatives markets, which includes futures, swaps, and certain kinds of options.” [wiki]

Now I don’t know about you, but to me, this seems as a huge conflict of interests. And as far as I was able to find, so does to their own Code of Conduct and Supplemental Ethics Regulations.

See also  Tourists follow GPS directions straight into sea: ‘One expensive vacation’

Excerpt from the Code of Conduct

Which points directly to a law about this,

18 U.S. Code § 207 – Restrictions on former officers, employees, and elected officials of the executive and legislative branches

We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!

Since the point of CFTC is to oversee and regulate the very part of market that Citadel is also part of, I would imagine, that there could be instances when these two parties meet. And quick search showed, they do. For example in September, but that’s just to prove a point.

External meeting register of CFTC

I truly am just an ape, but I would imagine, that matters of these meetings are advised by a group of lawyers prior to them (maybe even during in some instances).

See also  DTC Alert! Change in Funding Accounts for USD payments on Canadian securities, DTC will be changing the funding account from the account held at the Bank of Montreal (BMO) & will transition all payments to either the DTC account held at the Royal Bank of Canada or account at J.P. Morgan Chase.

And since Tarbert is becoming the Chief of lawyers at Citadel Securities, they will all answer to him and he will lead them. That seems like a clear conflict of interest and, if I am getting it correctly, brakes the rule that prohibits this for 1-2 years after the termination and should be punishable.

Am I getting this right? Is it really enough for him to distance himself by only one level, so for example by not going to the meetings or to not directly communicate with any employee of his formal employer?

I honestly what to grasp this topic better, I’m not drawing any conclusions.



Disclaimer: This content does not necessarily represent the views of IWB.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.