It’s What They Do: Big Banks Are the Scorpion, Taxpayers Are the Frog

Sharing is Caring!

via Economica:

Everyone knows the parable of the frog and scorpion. The scorpion asks the frog for a ride across the river, and while the frog is making his way across, the scorpion stings him. As the frog is dying, he asks the scorpion why he stung him if he knew they’d both drown. The scorpion replies, “I’m a scorpion. I sting. That’s what I do.”

Big banks are the scorpion. They will always take on far more risk than is prudent, more than they are legally allowed and in any way, shape, or form they can. It is a seminal rule of markets. It’s what they do.

Big banks will press their bets to doomed-to-fail levels. Every time. They will reap the outsized gains while things are going well (or the Fed props up everything), then feign surprise when it all comes crashing down. Then demand you pay for it, while they give themselves bonuses, change nothing, and prepare to do it again.

See also  JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon: Commercial real estate losses may take a few banks down... Regulators should look at a short-selling BAN on banks

The banks are the scorpion. Only they get to drown everyone else at no cost to themselves.

I had thought banks would cease withdrawing their excess reserves…but in fact they are withdrawing those reserves even faster.

We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!

So the takeaways should be; (1) financial valuations are way out of whack with their long term relationship with DPI but (2) as long as banks are more interested in employing excess reserves than taking the rising interest paid on excess reserves…and continue to pull their reserves significantly faster than the Fed reduces its balance sheet, then financial assets are likely to continue rising as the hot money looks for a home.

See also  House Republicans vote to OVERTURN Biden's student loan forgiveness plan (why should taxpayers be forced to foot the cost for making the banksters whole on non-performing loans they made to Biden-supporting special snowflake deadbeats?)

Of course, further rate hikes, accelerations in reducing the balance sheet, or lemming like risk aversion…and this trend could turn on a dime.

So long as monetization continues, the impacts will be enriching the minority with significantly higher asset valuations and rental income while impoverishing the vast majority as costs rise significantly faster than most incomes.

The flipside of zero or negative monetization appears to be a fall back to the support of the real economy represented by disposable personal income (about 50% from here…but of course, a repeat of ’29 with assets falling up to 90% is easily in the realm).

The options appear to be a slow and painful cancer or a sudden crash…pick your poison well but know you won’t recover from the cancer…but you may get better after the crash.

ORIGINAL SOURCE: Monetization Trumps Fundamentals by Chris Hamilton at Economica on 5/13/18


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.