President Trump Speaks The Words We Long To Hear: “MASSIVE TAX CUTS!”

12 thoughts on “President Trump Speaks The Words We Long To Hear: “MASSIVE TAX CUTS!””

1. Left-handed affirmation that promotes the lie that federal tax is even “constitutional” for most Americans. Kind of like when MSM ‘exposes’ the government’s failing to stop “Mooslamic terrists!” on 9/11 – even making MOVIES about the lie for “Amerikans to enjoy”.

   • Bravo. Personal labor is not profit, so it’s not taxable. I passed the Certified Public Accountancy Exam in 1999. There are multiple court cases that have been won (and lost when the judge disallowed having the constitution read in their courtrooms…nfw! Yes, fk’ing way).
     STFU Occams!
     It’s even better. 40% of the population, don’t even pay taxes, but get REFUNDS (welfariors), around 10,000 dollars, if they file. Can’t make it up. I think that number again is WAY TOO LOW and full of shit. I think only 40% of people work and pay taxes now in the USSA.
     It gets even mo’ betta. Given Trump was already subverted in everything he has attempted to implement, INCLUDING TPP, which Ryan is going to reinstate…who gives a fk, if Trump does an EO or a dance, if the criminal government, Senate and Congress, will NEVER allow the working classes relief through actual law. Ain’t gonna happen. Here’s my quarter against anyone else’s quarter if they’re willing to bet against my position.
     To do so, giving people tax relief, so the working person would get some reprieve, from working themselves to death, just would never happen. That would give them the time, energy and money to overthrow their tyrannical government. Elites have known since time immemorial, to keep the people tired, hungry and afraid. You keep your subjects heads the fk down.
     What is government, but a parasite?

     • Excellent synopsis

   • IF THEY irs,ice fbi CANT FIND and DEPORT the 20 MILLION MEXICANS here then THEY will NEVER FIND TAX CHEATS , just DO IT!

   • Who will benefit from the tax cuts? Certainly not those making less than $125,000.
     They will benefit most the minions of the Deep State of the Rich Wasps & Jews.
     Christians and the Middle Class will receive NO benefit.

2. “Resistance to additional income taxes would be even more widespread
   if people were aware that . . . 100 percent of what is collected is
   absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt . . . . In other words,
   all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent
   on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government.” J. Peter
   Grace, “President’s Private Sector Survey on Cost Control: A Report to
   the President,” dated and approved January 12 and 15, 1984, p. 3.
   From the article with much more: https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/

3. Trump should just shut the Puerto Rico Trust know as the irs. It is just as private as is the fed its mother.

4. The elephant in the room from: https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/
   “A tax is a demand of sovereignty . . . State Freight Tax Case, 15 Wall (U. S.) 278, 21 L. Ed. 146.” John
   Bouvier, Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Third Revision (Being the Eighth
   Edition), revised by Francis Rawle (West Publishing Co.: St. Paul,
   Minn., 1914) (hereinafter “Bouvier’s”), p. 3220.
   The sovereign authority throughout the Union is the American People[16]; the sovereign authority in the District of Columbia, Congress.[17]
   The sovereign authority in the District of Columbia, Congress, is
   providing legislation for the laying and collection of tax (income tax)
   without the territory over which they are sovereign, in geographic area
   occupied by another sovereign, the American People.
   That Congress appear to be demanding income tax of the American People, joint tenants in the sovereignty, Chisholm v. Georgia,
   2 U.S. 2 Dall. 419, 472 (1793), residing throughout the Union means
   either that Congress is usurping exercise of territorial and personal
   legislation outside their territory or what we know as “income tax” is
   not actually a tax or both.
   “A tax is not a debt . . . New Jersey v. Anderson, 203 U. S.
   483, 27 Sup. Ct. 137, 51 L. Ed. 284 ; and has none of the incidents of a
   debt ; 21 Harv L. Rev. 283 ; technically it is not a debt . . .” Id.
   All alleged Federal income-tax liability is classified as debt, 28 U.S.C. 3002(3), and all Federal income-tax cases, civil and criminal, are prosecuted under the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. Chapter 176 Federal Debt Collection Procedure.
   What is called “income tax” ultimately is not a tax per se but a
   commercial penalty for the use of private property of the Federal
   Reserve Bank known as Federal Reserve Notes[18] (“FRNs”).
   The alleged income-tax liability generated from multiple transactions involving the same FRN (called velocity of money) will exceed the face value of the FRN after a few transactions.
   “No tax is valid which is not laid for a public purpose ;
   Citizens’ S. & L. Ass’n v. Topeka, 20 Wall. (U. S.) 655, 22 L. Ed.
   455, where it was said that there are limitations on the power of the
   three branches of government which grow out of the essential nature of
   all free governments—implied reservations of individual rights without
   which the social compact could not exist, and among these is that
   taxation must be for a public purpose ; such are (according to Cooley,
   Tax. 18) to preserve the public order ; to make compensation to public
   officers, etc. ; to erect, etc. public buildings ; to pay the expenses
   of legislation and of administering the laws, etc. ; also, to provide
   secular instruction ; Colley, Tax. 2d ed. 119–124 ; Kelly v. Pittsburgh,
   104 U. S. 81, 26 L. Ed. 658 . . .” Id. at 3221.
   No collection of what is called income tax goes toward a public purpose; all collections of income tax are used for a private purpose,
   i.e., to pay interest on the so-called national debt incurred by
   Congress and owed to a private bank, the Federal Reserve; to wit:
   “Resistance to additional income taxes would be even more
   widespread if people were aware that . . . 100 percent of what is
   collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt . . . . In
   other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one
   nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their
   Government.” J. Peter Grace, “President’s Private Sector Survey on Cost
   Control: A Report to the President,” dated and approved January 12 and
   15, 1984, p. 3.
   Banks do not pay income tax; to wit:
   “Sec. 7. . . . Tax exemption. Federal reserve banks,
   including the capital stock and surplus therein, and the income derived
   therefrom shall be exempt from Federal, State, and local taxation,
   except taxes upon real estate.” Federal Reserve Act, H. R. 7837, Ch.
   6, 38 Stat. 251, December 23, 1913.
   All collections of income tax paid to the private Federal Reserve are
   retired from circulation the same way they are created by banks in the
   so-called loan process—by computer-keypad keystroke, in exchange for the
   borrower’s promise-to-pay; to wit:
   “What they [banks] do when they make loans is to accept promissory notes in exchange for credits to the borrowers’ transaction [checking or credit-card]
   accounts.” Modern Money Mechanics: A Workbook on Bank Reserves and
   Deposit Expansion, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 1994, pp. 3–6.
   “If it [a bank] makes loans, it will simply credit the
   checking accounts of the borrowers. . . . [N]ew money, in the form of
   additional checkable deposits, will be “created.” The Federal Reserve Today: Fed Funds Rate, Discount Rate, 11th ed., Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, 1994, p. 21.
   “[M]oney exists simply as a bookkeeping entry at a bank . . .” The Story of Money, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2009, p. 17.
   “[W]hen a bank makes a loan, it simply adds to the borrower’s
   deposit account in the bank by the amount of the loan. This money is not
   taken from anyone else’s deposit; it was not previously paid in to the
   bank by anyone. It’s new money, created by the bank for the use of the
   borrower.” Robert B. Anderson, quoted in U.S. News & World Report,
   “How Much Will Your Dollar Buy – Interview with Secretary of the
   Treasury Robert B. Anderson,” August 31, 1959, pp. 68–69.
   The purpose of income tax is to remove from circulation a substantial
   portion of the digits of credit “loaned” into circulation by banks by
   bookkeeping entry in the so-called loan process.
   “The Federal Reserve is a fount of credit, not of capital. . . .”
   New York Times, “Stabilizing Money Rates,” Section 3, Editorial
   Section, January 18, 1920, p. 33.
   Unless a significant amount of the digits “loaned” into circulation
   by the banks are collected by the IRS in the form of FRNs from (1)
   payments of income tax, (2) seizure and sale of real and personal
   property, and (3) seizure of bank accounts and paychecks and thereafter
   gifted or bequeathed (31 U.S.C. 321(d)(1) and (2)) to a non-U.S. Government employee and proxy / agent of the private Federal Reserve, i.e., the Secretary of the Treasury,[19]
   for transmittal to the private Federal Reserve as payments of interest
   on the national debt and thereupon retired from circulation, inflation
   skyrockets, prices go through the roof, and the fraudulent nature of the
   fractional-reserve banking system of the private Federal Reserve can be
   concealed no longer.[20]
   Hence, the need to screen and select and vet and test and groom and
   own and control every single United States District Judge, Magistrate
   Judge, and Appeals Judge and Supreme Court Justice and United States
   Attorney and Assistant United States Attorney.
   Only two kinds of taxes: direct and indirect
   Article 1 § 8(1) of the Constitution provides, in pertinent part:
   “The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties,
   Imposts and Excises . . . but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be
   uniform throughout the United States;”
   This division of taxation into two classes, i.e., (1) direct taxes, called taxes, and (2) indirect taxes, called duties, imposts and excises, is recognized throughout the Constitution, Thomas v. United States, 192 U.S. 363, 24 S.Ct. 305, 48 L.Ed. 481.
   “Taxes are classified as direct, which includes ‘those which are assessed upon the property, person, business, income, etc. of those who pay them ; and indirect,
   or those which are levied on commodities before they reach the
   consumer, and are paid by those upon whom they ultimately fall, not as
   taxes, but as part of the market price of the commodity.’ Cooley, Tax.
   61. The latter includes duties, imposts and excises ; Pollock v. Trust
   Co., 157 U. S. 557, 15 Sup. Ct. 673, 39 L. Ed. 759 . . .” [Emphasis in
   original.] Bouvier’s, p. 3220, s.v. “Tax.”
   There is nothing wrong with direct taxes per se, so long as they are
   apportioned, i.e., divided and assigned in proportion, as provided in
   pertinent part of Article 1 § 2(3) of the Constitution; to wit:
   “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the
   several States which may be included within this Union, according to
   their respective Numbers . . .”
   Income tax, which is not apportioned, to any reasonable man clearly
   is a direct tax on the supreme political authority in America, the
   American People (fn. 15), and therefore unconstitutional; yet today
   income tax is regarded by government as an excise, or indirect tax,
   without the need to be apportioned, and therefore constitutional.
   The only way such absurdities can come to pass is by ownership and control of those making, declaring, and executing the law.
   All the chaos arrived with the Federal Reserve Act.
   Congress transmute Americans into corporately colored franchisees
   The only Americans who allegedly are liable to income tax are called individuals (26 C.F.R. 1.1-1 Income tax on individuals), a.k.a. taxpayers.
   The statutory term “individual” is defined at 5 U.S.C. 552a Records maintained on individuals as follows:
   “(a) Definitions.—For purposes of this section—
   “. . . (2) the term ‘individual’ means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence;”
   The phrase “citizen of the United States” means resident of the District of Columbia (see Memorandum of Law, August 10, 2015, p. 15, paragraphs 44–45).
   The phrase “alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence” means American
   non-resident of the District of Columbia who appears to have made an
   election (choice) to be treated as a resident of the District of
   Columbia (id. at 15–17, paragraphs 46–51).
   The statutory so-called individual is an artificial person, a
   creature of the law in the nature of a corporation and, like a
   corporation, designated by a name written in ALL-CAPITAL LETTERS (style
   of writing a proper noun for which the rules of English grammar make no
   provision).[21]
   A corporation is a franchise; to wit:
   “FRAN?CHISE, n. . . . A particular privilege or right granted by a
   prince or sovereign to an individual, or to a number of persons; as the
   right to be a body corporate with perpetual succession . . .” Noah
   Webster, An American Dictionary of the English Language (S. Converse:
   New York, 1828), Vol. I, s.v. “Franchise.”
   “FRANCHISE. . . . A franchise is privilege or immunity of a
   public nature, which cannot be exercised without legislative grant. To
   be a corporation is a franchise. The various powers conferred upon
   corporations are franchises.
   “The word ‘franchise’ has various significations, both in a legal and
   popular sense. A corporation is itself a franchise belonging to the
   members of a corporation, and the corporation, itself a franchise, may
   hold other franchises. So, also, the different powers of a corporation,
   such as the right to hold and dispose of property, are its franchises.
   In a popular sense, the political rights of subjects and citizens are
   franchises, such as the right of suffrage, etc.” Henry Campbell Black, A
   Law Dictionary (West Publishing Co.: St. Paul, Minn., 1891), p. 515.
   The right to receive Social Security retirement or survivor benefits
   and the right to vote for the president of the United States (District
   of Columbia Municipal Corporation) are political rights and franchises
   conferred by the sovereign authority in the District of Columbia:
   Congress, a.k.a. “Congress of the United States,” 28 U.S.C. 3002(2),
   i.e., the Congress of a Federal corporation, id. at 3002(15), the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation.
   Nature of so-called individual income tax
   “The federal corporation tax act (August 5, 1909) provided
   that every corporation for profit . . . engaged in business in any
   state should be subject to pay annually a special excise tax with
   respect to carrying-on or doing business by such corporation . . . upon
   the entire net income . . . received by it from all sources. This act
   was held valid in Flint v. Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 107, 31 Sup. Ct. 342, 55
   L. Ed. 389, Ann. Cas. 1912B, 1312 (followed in McCoach v R. Co., 228 U.
   S. 295, 33 Sup. Ct. 419, 57 L. Ed. 842), as being an impost or excise
   on the doing of business and not a direct tax.
   “It was also there held that it complies with the provision
   for uniformity throughout the United States . . . and that the tax is
   properly measured by the entire income of the companies subject to it . .
   .
   “. . . It [the corporation income tax] is an excise tax
   measured by the corporate income ; Stratton’s Independence v. Howbert,
   231 U. S. 399, 34 Sup. Ct. 136, 58 L.Ed. —; imposed upon the doing of
   business and not upon the franchises or property of the corporation ;
   McCoach v R. Co., 228 U. S. 295, 33 Sup. Ct. 419, 57 L. Ed. 842. . . .”
   [Emphasis in original.] Bouvier’s, p. 3229.
   The only kind of income tax that is not a direct tax but an indirect
   tax and excise on the income, from whatever source derived, of a
   franchisee, is what modernly is known as “income tax.”
   That the post-19th century Supreme Court has ruled that
   the personal income tax on American men and women is an excise is proof
   that Government treats of every American as an ALL-CAPITAL LETTER
   franchise, i.e., an individual: artificial person and creature
   of the law in the nature of a corporation who, like all franchises,
   exists by privilege conferred by the state (District of Columbia
   Municipal Corporation).
   All so-called State (District of Columbia) tax codes draw
   substantially (almost exclusively) from the Internal Revenue Code for
   their respective provisions and deal strictly with franchisees, i.e. individuals (citizens of the United States, 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(2), i.e., residents of the District of Columbia, Memorandum of Law, August 10, 2015, p. 15, paragraphs 44–45) and corporations.
   For example, the California Revenue and Taxation Code provides, in
   pertinent part, that California is neither a statutory state nor part of
   the statutory geographical United States but a foreign country
   thereto—and the State of California Franchise Tax Board taxes only
   individuals who are residents of, or corporations who are organized or
   commercially domiciled in, “this state” (District of Columbia); to wit:
   “17017. ‘United States,’ when used in a geographical sense,
   includes the states, the District of Columbia, and the possessions of
   the United States.
   “17018. ‘State’ includes the District of Columbia, and the possessions of the United States.
   “17019. ‘Foreign country’ means any jurisdiction other than one embraced within the United States.”
   ?“[Individuals] 17041. (a)(1) There shall be imposed for
   each taxable year upon the entire taxable income of every resident of
   this state . . .”
   ?“[Corporations] 23101. (a) “Doing business” means
   actively engaging in any transaction for ??the purpose of financial or
   pecuniary gain or profit.
   “(b) . . . a taxpayer is doing business in this state for a taxable year
   if . . . . [t]he taxpayer is organized or commercially domiciled in
   this state.”
   For the meaning of the word “includes” in the above code citations, see Rule 6, expressio unius est exclusio alterius, of the rules of statutory construction, Memorandum of Law, August 10, 2015, p. 3, paragraph 6.
   The 16th Amendment provides for an excise tax on franchisees
   The Sixteenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of February 3, 1913, provides:
   “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on
   incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the
   several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.”
   The 16th Amendment provides that Congress shall have power
   to lay and collect an indirect tax, an excise, on incomes, from
   whatever source derived, of franchisees residing or doing business in
   one of the several statutory States of February 3, 1913: the District of
   Columbia, Porto Rico (changed to Puerto Rico in 1932), Alaska, American
   Samoa, Guam, Hawaii, Midway Atoll, and the Panama Canal Zone and no
   other thing, id. at 8, paragraph 23.

   • Tyvm, you mind if I copy that and keep it handy?
     I do feel like I have to puke now, but thanks again. Just STARING YOU in the face. ffs.

   • Please do and spread it around.

5. NOT SO FAST THERE BUNKER BUNKIE!
   You LIED ! NOBODY BELIEVES any moreof your NONSENSE BS!

6. So how are we going to pay for the war?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.