Project Veritas Can Now Legally Conduct Undercover Investigations in Massachusetts!

Sharing is Caring!

via projectveritas:

Massachusetts Law Prohibiting Secret Recording of Public Officials Deemed Unconstitutional
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Rules in Veritas’ Favor
“[T]he Court holds that [Massachusetts law] may not constitutionally prohibit the secret audio recording of government officials…”
Secretly Recording Government Officials in Public Places Now Protected by First Amendment


(Boston) Project Veritas attorneys Benjamin Barr and Steve Klein have received word from the United States Court for the District of Massachusetts of its victory in Project Veritas Action Fund v. Conley. The lawsuit filed against the state argued that the Massachusetts law prohibiting the secret recording of public officials was unconstitutional.

Said James O’Keefe, founder and president of Project Veritas Action:

“Project Veritas has made First Amendment history. With the summary judgement in this case being entered in our favor, PVA v Conley becomes the first case in United States history to hold that secretly recording government officials is protected by the First Amendment” 

View the Court Order here.

Filed on December 10, 2018, the United States District Court District of Massachusetts found, “the First Amendment protects the right to record audio and video of government officials,” deeming the law prohibiting secret recordings of government officials unconstitutional.

See also  FBI destroyed ALL the evidence related to its investigations into the Clinton Foundation

The unconstitutional law, enforceable in Massachusetts since 1968, allowed for a felony conviction for up to five years in prison, and a $10,000 for the secret recording of a public official.

We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!

Audio Recording is More Powerful Than Ordinary Reporting

See also  House passes updated version of the Senate budget, which includes $34.2 million in capital project earmarks for House Majority members "Amazing how fast the House majority abandoned the bigger dividend today. That issue seems to have just died. $35 million goes a long way!"

The Court explained in the judgement that “audio and audiovisual recording are uniquely reliable and powerful methods of preserving and disseminating news and information about events that occur in public. Their self-authenticating character makes it highly unlikely that other methods could be considered reasonably adequate substitutes.”

The Court agreed in the judgment that secretly recording government officials is a “basic, vital, and well-established liberty safeguarded by the First Amendment.”

Said Project Veritas Action Fund’s attorney Ben Barr, of the victory:

“Veritas’ win demonstrates that undercover reporting is protected just as adamantly as ordinary reporting under the First Amendment, allowing it to continue to deliver important news to the American public.”

Project Veritas is aware of other states with similarly prohibitive recording laws.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.