Great information in this Twitter post and I don’t pretend to understand all of the implications yet.
To summarise:
1) If you have a medical reason which means you cannot be vaccinated or tested, you may be asked to self-declare this medical exemption
2) Denial of free and informed consent is a self certified medical reason.
In R Wilkinson v Broadmoor : [2001] EWCA Civ 1545, Lady Justice Hale, Supreme Court President, confirmed that forced medical procedure without informed consent "may be sued in the ordinary way for the (common law) tort of battery". https://t.co/LXdp4ifD4g
— Weston A. Price Foundation, London 🏴 (@WAPFLondon) July 27, 2021
This will result in a breach of contract and also a Tort that can be sued. The above is why mask "mandate" exemptions were self certified. It is unlawful for Doctors to interfere with the process of free and informed consent. Informed consent is defined in Montgomery as follows:
— Weston A. Price Foundation, London 🏴 (@WAPFLondon) July 27, 2021
2. Sufficient information means informing the patient of the availability of other treatments (and forms of testing).
— Weston A. Price Foundation, London 🏴 (@WAPFLondon) July 27, 2021
h/t Verdon