YESTERDAY: “Stop being paranoid, Republicans. We don’t want to ban guns.” TODAY: House Democrats introduce bill prohibiting sale of semi-automatic weapons with 150+ co-sponsors


Are you making your list and checking it twice? These traitors need to be voted out of Congress at all costs.
House Democrats have introduced a bill banning semi-automatic firearms in the wake of the Feb. 14 shooting at a high school in Parkland, Fla.
Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., announced Monday he is introducing the Assault Weapons Ban of 2018. More than 150 Democrats have signed on in support of the legislation, Rep. Ted Deutch, D-Fla., said.

www.washingtonexaminer.com/house-democrats-introduce-bill-prohibiting-sale-of-semi-automatic-weapons/article/2650087
The Assault Weapons Ban of 2018 will prohibit the sale, transfer, production, and importation of:
Semi-automatic rifles and pistols with a military-style feature that can accept a detachable magazine;
Semi-automatic rifles with a fixed magazine that can hold more than 10 rounds;
Semi-automatic shotguns with a military-style feature;
Any ammunition feeding device that can hold more than 10 rounds;
And 205 specifically-named and listed firearms.

cicilline.house.gov/press-release/cicilline-introduces-assault-weapons-ban-2018
Here’s the only link I can find to the actual bill. It contains the list of 205 specifically named firearms.
It also sounds like any firearm purchased before this bill would be grandfathered in, but there would be rules for storage of those firearms (I was wrong about concealed carry.
Sounds like you either have to have it on your person or locked up).
This is the kind of shit they want to pass. They want to completely disarm us.
cicilline.house.gov/sites/cicilline.house.gov/files/images/Assault_Weapons_Ban_of_2018.pdf
Look at this paragraph at the end. They know this is unconstitional but they want to make it as difficult as possible to fight this kind of gun grab:
If any provision of this Act, an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, the amendments made by this Act, and the application of such provision or
amendment to any person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby

cicilline.house.gov/sites/cicilline.house.gov/files/images/Assault_Weapons_Ban_of_2018.pdf
SECURE STORAGE OR SAFETY DEVICE REQUIREMENT FOR GRANDFATHERED SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS.— It shall be unlawful for any person, other than a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or
licensed dealer, to store or keep under the dominion or
control of that person any grandfathered semiautomatic assault weapon that the person knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, will be accessible to an individual prohib2
ited from receiving or possessing a firearm under sub3
section (g), (n), or (x), or any provision of State law, un4
less the grandfathered semiautomatic assault weapon is—‘‘(1) carried on the person, or within such closeproximity that the person can readily retrieve and use the grandfathered semiautomatic assault weapon as if the grandfathered semiautomatic assault weapon were carried on the person; or
‘‘(2) locked by a secure gun storage or safety
device that the prohibited individual has no ability to
access.’’.
cicilline.house.gov/sites/cicilline.house.gov/files/images/Assault_Weapons_Ban_of_2018.pdf
The Assault Weapons Ban of 1994 is credited with losing Democrats the House and with costing Al Gore the 2000 Presidential Election. Democrats have not grown any smarter since then. The Blue Wave just turned into a whirlpool circling the drain.
NOTHING galvanizes Conservatives and leads Liberal patriots to jump ship from the Democratic Party faster than coming after the 2nd Amendment.
They’re not tired of losing, apparently.
h/t Daniel Higdon

We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Views:

5 thoughts on “YESTERDAY: “Stop being paranoid, Republicans. We don’t want to ban guns.” TODAY: House Democrats introduce bill prohibiting sale of semi-automatic weapons with 150+ co-sponsors”

  1. The Supreme Court has ruled, on numerous occasions that “Where rights (liberty) secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no legislation which would abrogate (abolish) them.“

    Reply
  2. So let’s just keep the massacres of our children going on unabated. Anybody who thinks, a good guy with a gun is the answer, or safer schools, or better police protection will solve this problem is an idiot. Unless you guys get some rational thinking going eventually these guns will be banned because people are tired of massacres.

    Reply
    • David you are not looking at the bigger picture. These “massacres” are done by PMCs (Private military contractors), jackals, or CIA, then blamed on a dumb patsy they have been working with. Oswald, Boston bombers, Martin Bryant at Port Arthur were all working with them, same goes for the twin tower bomber. They are done with the purpose to force the gun ban narrative, and make people waver in their view of guns. These events that are happening today were predicted long ago, because the same people that ran communism in Russia, run the USA today. They want to implement GLOBAL COMMUNISM and have laid out their framework for what they want in the future. They simply can’t force their form of communism/socialism onto people that are armed, and will fight back! So they MUST ban them.
      Terrorism is a MANUFACTURED thing. The USA funds and trains Al Qaeda who change their name daily now, and ISIS. It is all done to scare the shit out of everyone so they can demand gun control, and you are falling for it. NOBODY wants to see kids or innocent people massacred, but think about this. The very people calling for gun control have guns protecting them, and still will after any gun ban. The PMCs and jackals and CIA,FBI every alphabet agency will still have them, the military will still have them, so will the police, and so will the criminals. Gun bans only take guns away from decent law abiding people.
      If you think these school massacres are bad now, can you imagine the killings when good people no longer have the ability to say NO to communism and a hard left United Nations?
      I was also for gun control at one point in my life, but once you see WHY they want it, and what they will do after it is in place. there is no way people can allow it to happen.
      If what I just said sounds like gobbledygook, you need to do some research of your own.

      Reply
      • I was a 9/11 truther from the get go. But not everything is a false flag. I believe Vegas was. And perhaps Boston as well. But I don’t buy the young kids are false flag patsy’s. I think these killings are the result of serious mental illness and years ago these people would have been in mental institutions on the grounds that they were dangers to themselves or others. But nobody wants to spend tax money on the mentally ill. Instead now we give them drugs which often makes their illness worse. And I think that is what is happening in the school shootings. I don’t buy the false flag narrative with them at all. What I do think is claims of false flag are disinformation to confuse us all about a true false flag versus one that is not. Seems like everything is a false flag now. Standard operating procedure and I don’t buy it.

        Reply

Leave a Reply to davidgmills1 Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.