BY SKY WANDERER
Today the Twitter moderators locked my account again, for the third time within a short period.
It appears that our two major social media platforms, Facebook and Twitter, are becoming more antisocial with each day. As if the owners and operators of these systems were entirely unaware that there exists such a UN-defined human right as right to freedom of opinion and expression:
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Twitter and their so-called moderators apparently managed to overlook the very principles our society, and they as part of it, were supposed to observe. Maybe even UN itself never read the very fundamental rights they laid down in the document titled as the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”.
The message I sent in response to the Twitter team:
“I am again locked out of my twitter account – and again, wrongfully accused of “hateful conduct”. According to your system everything counts as “hateful” that is actually self-defence against the Islamic hate targeting the entire democratic West.
Your so-called “peaceful environment” is nothing but one vast collection of hatred, fake and manipulative news, incitement to continuing the unlawful and hateful occupation of Europe and imposition of the most hateful system ever in history, the Islamic Sharia law.
You “system admins” are nothing but a shameless group of agents to foster hatred, by suppressing free speech and by assisting the development of such extremely hateful and bloody global fascist system as the Islamic Sharia law-ruled system is. I am thoroughly fed up and disgusted with your hateful policies and the false accusations based upon your policies.
I no longer care about using your worse than worthless, unreliable and slanderous “services”.
Since it is your team who unilaterally decides what is “hateful conduct” and what isn’t, and apparently your policy is such that the truth and self-defence against hate is hateful, YOU HATERS feel free to delete any of my posts, all of my posts, or feel free to close my account.”
***
Short review of the global political status quo:
1) Europe is literally flooded with migrants from at least 3 continents: Mideast, Africa and Asia. There is NO justification for such magnitude of population-transfer, since these millions of migrants are NOT refugees and there exists no such human right that one is entitled to settle in any country.
2) The Establishment’s victim-blaming strategy has been fully effective. We, citizens of Western countries are under literal invasion by the ever growing masses Islamic occupiers, yet we are forced into a position to “prove” that we are not Nazis. That is, while we are expected to peacefully endure the invasion, the invader Arab Nazi masses are very “peacefully” taking over our countries via their declared Demographic Jihad.
bnp.org.uk/demographic-jihad/
3) Above process implies that once the Arab masses would become majority in non-Islamic democratic countries, they will use our Western democratic systems to actually erase our democratic systems and replace our equality and human right-based laws with the Islamic hate-filled, discriminatory and staggeringly cruel, barbaric Sharia law.
To demonstrate what such laws actually imply, a present day example: in Saudi Arabia people are publicly executed in the most brutal way, for such “offences” as “apostasy” that is, if someone leaves Islam or just criticises the Islam religion:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_Saudi_Arabia
4) It speaks volumes about the value of the “free, democratic” world, that the top human rights organisation, UN never mentions the necessity to liberate the oppressed people of Saudi Arabia as top priority.
The very existence of Islam as “religion” and the inequality and discrimination-based Sharia Law based upon such religion is by itself a gross violation all the principles defined by UN.
Article 1.
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights
Article 2.
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
Article 3.
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Article 5.
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Article 18.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
5) After looking at above declaration, it is evident that the Islamic Sharia Law sharply contradicts the UN-defined very principles the Western democracies have been based upon. The Islamic intolerance and discrimination against women and everyone who does not confess this religion (infidels/kafirs) is especially striking, as well as the Sharia-prescribed torturous and humiliating forms of punishments for criminal acts and for acts that Islam specifies as “immoral”. All these punishments are blatant violations of human rights and the very set of Islamic laws as such should be banned as the ultimate hate speech. A list of the Islamic barbaric “laws” is provided here:
www.billionbibles.org/sharia/sharia-law.html
Recommended reading on how Sharia law subverts our Western laws:
lawyerssecularsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/lss-sharia-law-essay.pdf
In summary, Sharia Law is nothing but the crude anti-thesis of all principles of human rights and democratic legal systems:
6) Rather than liberating the Middle Eastern countries from the Islamofascist Sharia cult, the Western establishment is paving the path for the same barbaric system to be implemented all over the West. As a result, an ever growing number of Islamic occupiers demand the implementation of the Islamic Sharia Law in non-Islamic, democratic countries, which means we Western citizens are effectively forced our of our living space, ie from the areas where the laws of an evil and discriminatory cult are applicable rather than our democratic laws.
In Germany the creeping Sharia Law already achieved a highly advanced stage years ago.
Since the mainstream media are deliberately silent about the alarming process of Islamic takeover of the West, we can only guess that the current situation in Germany, in Europe and all over the West, is significantly worse.
www.israelislamandendtimes.com/germany-submits-sharia-law/
7) For those still in doubt regarding the nature and purpose of the so-called “multiculturalism” enforced in the West,
there are several facts and questions to consider.
A crucial fact that is stubbornly suppressed even in the alternative media: the Islamic invasion and the very process of Islamisation of the West is an agenda following an OPEC-blackmail and an agreement that comes down to a contract of selling out the entire West to Islam.
Two independent research pointing at the same:
“Alain Wagner: The reasons why Europe is being colonised by Muslims”
“Islamization of Europe – What You Didn’t Know”
The above-presented fact of the grand sell-out of the West is evidence that the general social-political-economic meltdown, pre-civil war status, and effective replacement of Western ethnics with Arab and African populations, has nothing to with helping refugees, or with values such as multiculturalism. On a side-note, no such value as multiculturalism exists, it is just an invention of so-called liberals, whose hypocrisy simply knows no limits. They feel free to label anyone a racist, hater, bigot, Nazi, etc – without ever defining these terms – who don’t find the arbitrarily defined subjective “value” of multiculturalism a value.
A major counter-argument against the liberal allegation of our self-defence as Nazism, is the fact that the very definition-basis of Nazism, Hitler himself was a fervent admirer of Islam and, as a close ally of the Muslim Brotherhood the Nazi armies contained a massive number of Muslims who were deployed for the purpose of mass-murdering Jews and Christians.
“Adolph Hitler & Islam”
www.billionbibles.org/sharia/hitler-muslim-brotherhood.html
Thus, in reality the opposite of the liberal statement is the case: when we wish to stop and reverse the Muslim mass-migration in the West, we are actually defending us against a Nazi invasion.
Racism and hatred is what the liberal elites commit: they colonise most of the 3rd world, then they blame the effects of colonisation en masse on the white race and behind our back they form alliance with our enemies. That alone is already racist stance against the white race.
Then these groups of so-called “liberals” separate themselves from the races they “protect” and transfer the consequence of their migration policies to be suffered by the Western masses. Liberals live in their ivory tower, in white-race-dominated luxury districts, drive large cars, never mix with other races, never use public transport, they or their daughters never get raped and killed in no-go zones. The liberals’ children attend elite schools, where they are not forced to sit together with children who are already wearing their humiliating hijabs, where they don’t have to eat halal food, and don’t have to participate in obligatory courses on Islam. The rest 99% have to. And when we protest and attempt to defend ourselves from the Islamic colonisation of our countries, we are deprived of our right to defence, then we are labelled Nazis, racists, haters.
There are some further considerations to review in this context:
If the Western Establishment’s goal was to provide help for these so-called “refugees” why don’t they help these people in the very countries where they live? Why do they keep colonising them instead? And in case there are human rights violations, why don’t the NATO enforce human rights in said regions? Why the transfer of whole populations of at least three continents instead?
If the Western liberal governments’ intent is to provide asylum for refugees for the reason that they escape from human rights abuse, how come the same authorities do not ban the same human rights abuser Sharia law in the West, ie in the countries these “refugees” escaped to? Moreover the Western governments even encourage as “tolerance” the same intolerant laws that these “refugees” allegedly escaped from.
If these “refugees” so passionately hate the Western “decadent” system and they so violently despise Western democracy – evidenced by the Muslim anti-democracy demonstrations and the long series of migrant anti-white hate-crimes, ie the staggering number of rape and murder of Western citizens – WHY did these migrants “escape” to the “decadent” West in the first place? And if these Muslim masses harbour so much hatred towards the Western equality-based, tolerant, democratic system, WHY don’t they move back to an Islamic country, where they can freely “enjoy” their Sharia-system of anti-freedom, intolerance, discrimination, dictatorship, oppression and cruelty?
HOW COME, THAT INSTEAD OF JUST MOVING OUT OF THE WEST, THESE “REFUGEES” DEMAND THEIR OWN DICTATORIAL AND DISCRIMINATORY LEGAL SYSTEM TO BE IMPLEMENTED IN THE WEST, UNDER WHICH LAWS WE WESTERN CITIZENS WOULD BECOME 2ND CLASS CITIZENS?
