3 Reasons the Twin Towers Could NOT Have Been Brought Down With Explosives On 9/11

Facebook Twitter Telegram Email
by WashingtonsBlog
Preface: We’ve previously shown that 9/11 couldn’t have been an inside job, because:
  • 9/11 was thoroughly and exhaustively investigated by the 9/11 Commission, Congress and U.S. scientific agencies
  • No one could have foreseen 9/11
  • Government officials didn’t have time to stop the 9/11 attacks, once they realized America was under attack
  • It couldn’t have been a conspiracy, because no one could keep such a big conspiracy secret … someone would have talked
  • Our government wouldn’t do anything like that, and
  • Our free press would have reported on anything that outrageous

See for yourself.
But many people still believe that the World Trade Center buildings which collapsed on 9/11 were brought down with controlled demolition. This essay shows they can’t possibly be right.

I. No One Could Have Planted Bombs In a Crowded Office Building

Conspiracy theorists don’t realize that no one could have planted bombs in a crowded office building like the Twin Towers.
Admittedly, tightrope walker Philippe Petit snuck into the World Trade Center with a friend in 1974 withmassive amounts of equipment, smuggled the equipment to the top floor and rigged up a highwire for his tightrope walking stunt without being detected.
And it’s true that in 1978, the 59-story story Citicorp building was secretly retrofitted at night over the course of several months without the knowledge of tenants, the general public, or the media:


And in 2009, Raw Story noted:

A Government Accountability Office investigator smuggled live bomb components into a federal building in just 27 seconds, then assembled a bomb in a restroom and ventured throughout the building without being detected, a leaked tape revealed Wednesday.
In addition, congressional investigators were able to penetrate every single federal building they probed without any difficulty — 10 in all.

And see this.
And we concede that:

  • A tenant of the World Trade Center hired a “sprinkler repairman” shortly before 9/11, and gave him access to 6 underground levels at World Trade Center building 1
READ  31 Reasons Why I Won’t Take the Vaccine

The chief electrical engineer who wired the World Trade Centers (Richard Humenn) says that people working on the elevators could have planted explosives:

And mechanical engineer Gordon Ross, in his talk on the destruction of the Twin Towers, pointed outthat:

“Those [core] columns which were situated adjacent to and accessible from inside the elevator shafts failed at an early stage of the collapse.
Those columns which were remote from the elevator shafts, and not accessible from the elevator shafts, survived the early stages of the collapse.”*

Indeed, a top demolition expert says that with access to the elevator shaft, a team of loading experts would have access to the columns and beams:

According to USA Today: “On Sept. 11, ACE Elevator of Palisades Park, N.J., had 80 elevator mechanics inside the World Trade Center“.
And the U.S. government agency (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) itself says that, on 9/11, “Elevators 6A and 7A were out of service for modernization“. (NIST NCSTAR 1-8, p.97).
In addition, Ace worked in and around structural steel at the Twin Towers:

A run of approximately 80 vertical feet, employed over 300 running feet of 2-1/2? x 8? and 2?x 2? trough raceway. This run traveled through plaster ceilings, concrete floors andaround structural steel.

Indeed, there had been numerous elevator renovation and and asbestos removal projects in the 6 years prior to 9/11 which allowed access to core building structures, including:

READ  31 Reasons Why I Won’t Take the Vaccine

But so what?

II. No One Heard Explosions

Conspiracy theorists also ignore the fact that there were no sounds of explosions on 9/11.
Well, there were some:



There are literally hundreds of other witnesses who heard explosions.
Indeed, witnesses heard explosions even before the planes hit …
A hero who saved many people on 9/11, and who was the last person out of the north tower, said that there was a massive explosion from the basement in the North Tower BEFORE the plane hit:

And other witnesses say something similar:


But those videos and witnesses don’t count.

III. The Collapse of Three Buildings On 9/11 Wasn’t Suspicious

If the World Trade Center buildings had been brought down by demolition, they would have fallen in an unusual manner.
But that didn’t happen for very long:


So there you have it … 9/11 was not a false flag attack, and the 3 World Trade Center buildings which collapsed on 9/11 could not have been due to controlled demolition.

1,406 views

119 thoughts on “3 Reasons the Twin Towers Could NOT Have Been Brought Down With Explosives On 9/11”

  1. The collapse of the WTC Towers could not have been a controlled demolition.
    The collapse of each Tower initiated where there was totally out of controlled fire.
    “Indeed, witnesses heard explosions even before the planes hit …
    A hero who saved many people
    on 9/11, and who was the last person out of the north tower, said that
    there was a massive explosion from the basement in the North Tower BEFORE the plane hit:”
    That claim is false. A massive explosion in the basement would have produced smoke that would have been pouring out of the entrances to the basement garage, which would have been photographed. There was no evidence to support any claim of a massive explosion in the basement. The hero probably would not have survived a massive explosion in the basement, if there had been one.
    The story of the hero has also changed over time, which would not have been the case, if he was telling the truth.
    The jetliner struck the Tower, which caused the first rumble. The jetliner severed elevator cables, which sent elevators plunging. There was a second rumble, after which a man who had been burned, exited an elevator in the basement. There was no explosion prior to the jetliner striking the Tower.
    “There are literally hundreds of other witnesses who heard explosions.”
    There are things that explode in fires. Things that are not explosives.
    “If the World Trade Center buildings had been brought down by demolition, they would have fallen in an unusual manner.”
    They fell in a manner that was consistent with the out of control fires. As can be seen in videos of the Towers, the collapse began in the fire zone, no where else.
    Fire, not controlled demolition was the cause.

  2. “An Aidan Moneghan production”
    That is a clue right there. A production. A propaganda film. The producer controls what the audience sees and hears. All else is edited out.
    There is sound video footage of a news reporter standing at an NYFD staging area across from WTC2. The camera tilted up at the Tower just as the upper 30 floors began to tip over to the east. There was no sound of explosions. A rumble began as the sound of the now collapsing building reached the microphone the reporter was holding.

    • Title over black: “Did Bombs Destroy the World Trade Center on 9/11? (played over dramatic sound effect).
      Answer: No. TOTALLY out of control fires did. That is the common element in the collapse of all three buildings.

  3. “Indeed, there had been numerous elevator renovation and and asbestos
    removal projects in the 6 years prior to 9/11 which allowed access to
    core building structures, including:”
    So? There is a record of who did the work. It is really evidence of an inventive imagination to insinuate bombs could have been surreptitiously planted. Insinuations are not credible proof of anything. There IS well documented evidence of TOTALLY out of control fires in each office tower that collapsed.

  4. “And the U.S. government agency (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) itself says that, on 9/11, “Elevators 6A and 7A were out of service for modernization“. (NIST NCSTAR 1-8, p.97).”
    So? It isn’t proof of anything other than that elevators 6A and 7A were not in service on 9/11 due to refurbishment. Disneyland shuts down rides at different times during the off season for refurbishment.
    Grasping at straws is not credible evidence.

  5. Israeli “Mossad Agents” posing as students planted plastic explosives and fuses in the WTC buildings. There are photos of this on the web.
    https://chemtrailsplanet.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/911-gelatin-art-students-in-wtc-tower_12.jpg1
    Military jets were flown by remote control into the buildings. Ask a pilot.
    A Tesla device was used to vibrate the building into dust as the explosives detonated, quite an attack.
    The Dark Side Of Tesla’s Technology
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btXU4FwygJk&feature=youtu.be
    Israel and the corrupted in the US and international politics and banking were all behind it, but Israel was the ring leader, had the most to gain, but ultimately, now…they are losing everything, Israel is busted big, Israel is defunct, subject to the creator’s judgment.
    Israel, Not In America’s Name, 2016!

    • “Military jets were flown by remote control into the buildings. Ask a pilot.”
      False. United and American jetliners struck the Towers. They had been hijacked.
      “A Tesla device was used to vibrate the building into dust as the explosives detonated, quite an attack.”
      Fiction.

          • Nope. Can you see the apparatus on the belly of the jet? That’s military, 100%!
            Have you checked out the Tesla evidence?

          • There is no apparatus on the belly of the jetliner. The jetliner was videoed by a number of people from different angles.
            The claim was dis proven a long time ago.

          • What claim to you believe was disproved, the military jets or the tesla device used to take down the building?
            Either one, we’ll need to agree to disagree.
            Israel Mossad agents planted explosives, military jets were flown by remote control into the towers, a Tesla device was used to take down WTC 1 & 2 in-conjunction with the explosives planted by Israel.

          • There were no remote control planes. Two scheduled airline flights that left Logan in Boston, were hijacked. Each was flown into a WTC Tower.
            David Angell, a producer on the TV show Frasier, was on flight 11. He is dead.
            There was no Tesla device. TOTALLY out of control fire caused the Towers to collapse.

          • ah. You haven’t done your research.
            Question: Can you site Israel’s motive for perpetrating the 9/11 false flag terror event?

          • I have seen the videos of the jetliners striking the buildings and of the TOTALLY out of control fires and the manner in which the Towers collapsed, which was totally consistent with fire being the cause.
            What is your reason for pretending Israel perpetrated 9/11?

          • Israel perpetrated 9/11 to provoke a revenge war with the Arab world. Israel wants to ethnically cleanse the Middle East in a feeble, now defunct attempt to establish the fraud of “greater Israel”.

          • Saudi Arabia and Israel are working to depose Assad.
            The U.S. government is friends with Saudi Arabia’s government, despite 15 of the 19 hijackers being from there.

          • Yes, the Semitic Saudis and Israel are working together to invade Syria to assassinate Assad to help Israel in their now defunct plan to conquer Earth. Thankfully, Russia stepped in and BREXIT passed, so, Israel will now reap what they have sewn.
            The corrupt Semites in the US are “friends” with the corrupt Semite Saudi government. The Saudi hijackers were just characters in the Israeli borne 9/11 false flag event, their characters were used to provoke a revenge war with the Arab world as stated above.

          • I am sure that is what you want to imagine.
            Khalid Shekh Mohammed was the mastermind of 9/11.

          • 9/11, Conspiracy Solved:
            https://youtu.be/mywufAaKARc
            I know exactly what happened on 9/11!
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDJk0kKtly8&feature=youtu.be
            And thus far, you have offered zero rebuttal. Just a few emotional statements. I’ve presented you with cold, hard evidence.
            You’ve conceded the points unless you have a rebuttal!
            Israel planted explosives, the corrupt in the US flew military jets by remote control into the towers, a Tesla weapon was used to turn the building to dust by vibration!
            Israel, Not In America’s Name, 2016!

          • “I know exactly what happened on 9/11!”
            “911 Conspiracy Solved Names, Connections…”
            Someone’s propaganda video. There are a lot of them on the internet these days.

          • “And thus far, you have offered zero rebuttal. Just a few “emotional statements. I’ve presented you with cold, hard evidence.”
            Me: “I have seen the videos of the jetliners striking the buildings and of the TOTALLY out of control fires and the manner in which the Towers collapsed, which was totally consistent with fire being the cause.”
            That is not an emotional statement, those are cold hard facts.

          • The “Me” statement above is fraud. There wasn’t enough fuel in each jet to cause the amount of damage done to each building.
            So, here again, you’ve offered no rebuttal. Just another fraud.
            Next!

          • “The “Me” statement above is fraud. There wasn’t enough fuel in each jet to cause the amount of damage done to each building.”
            A terribly weak retort. Why do they spray fire retardant on structural steel? Because office building contents are flammable and office fires can weaken structural steel.
            Flames were pouring out of the WTC buildings from floor to ceiling and beyond, due to office furniture and other contents that were on fire.
            If any statement is a fraud, it is yours. Jet fuel wasn’t the only thing burning in the buildings. The total is the sum of its parts. The sum total of damage due to fire, resulted in the buildings collapsing due to a catastrophic failure of the structural steel due to totally out of control fire.

      • lol. John, you optimize what’s wrong with humanity. You are stuck in a broken ego, you haven’t done your homework and when you have no argument, you throw a temper tantrum, do name calling, and kick up sand. Big Deal. You’ve made my argument!
        Do you have a rebuttal to the cold, hard evidence I’ve presented? The evidence convicts Israel, proves beyond any doubt Israel is indeed the synagogue of satan behind the ritual mass sacrifice at the WTC on 9/11.

  6. “Bomb in the building, not a second plane”
    Ooops. There are numerous videos and live broadcast of the second plane striking WTC2.

  7. And mechanical engineer Gordon Ross, in his talk on the destruction of the Twin Towers, pointed outthat:“Those [core] columns which were situated adjacent to and
    accessible from inside the elevator shafts failed at an early stage of
    the collapse.”
    The whole top 15ish floors of WTC1 fell down upon the rest of the building.
    The whole top 30ish floors of WTC2 tipped over to the east as the collapse began.
    More than columns adjacent to the elevators were failing at an early stage of the collapse.

  8. Tom Sullivan.
    Note the detail he said goes into prepping a building for controlled demolition. It is not some small task. It also creates a lot of evidence of demolition, evidence that could not be consistently hidden from fire fighters and others working on the site as debris was removed.

  9. “And in 2009, Raw Story noted:
    A Government Accountability Office investigator smuggled
    live bomb components into a federal building in just 27 seconds, then
    assembled a bomb in a restroom and ventured throughout the building
    without being detected, a leaked tape revealed Wednesday.”
    That is a whole lot different than preparing a building for controlled demolition.
    Tom Sullivan pointed out in a video above, that it is very complex. The simple fact is that it is something that doesn’t happen in a working office building.

  10. …this is a bizarre article as it proves everything that we have been saying happened, or could have happened, yet they use BS to explain it away? I don’t get the point of the article. Misdirection?

    • Misdirection? r2bzjudge is in charge of that. I didn’t know there were people left who still believed the towers collapsed because of “out of controlled fires,” but apparently there are.

      • “Misdirection? r2bzjudge is in charge of that. I didn’t know there were
        people left who still believed the towers collapsed because of “out of
        controlled fires,” but apparently there are.”
        Such the comedian you are.
        Watch some videos of actual controlled demolitions.
        There was no rapid staccato of boom, boom, boom…. prior to the collapse of any of the WTC buildings, as there is in actual controlled demolitions.
        The top 15 floors of WTC One simply fell down upon the rest of the building and the the top 30 floors of WTC Two simply began to tip over to the east. There was no demoing occurring to cause that to happen. There was however, a TOTALLY out of control fire in both buildings.
        Damage to the structural steel due to the fires, caused a catastrophic failure.

          • “Damage to the structural steel due to the fires, caused a catastrophic failure.”
            Is that from the same script they were all reading from on the day?”
            No script Jon, just common sense observation of the videos of the TOTALLY OUT OF CONTROL FIRES and the subsequent collapse of the buildings that were on fire.

          • “”TOTALLY OUT OF CONTROL FIRES and the subsequent collapse of the buildings that were on fire.”
            You crack me up.”
            The truth cracks you up. Funny about that.

          • You have quite the talent for comebacks. Did you and John take the same matchbook cover creative writing course?

          • “You have quite the talent for comebacks. Did you and John take the same matchbook cover creative writing course?”
            I am not the one creating controlled demolition fantasies.

        • TOTALLY out of control fire?
          Rubbish, the fire in the first tower that fell was almost out, black smoke rising, which is why they had to bring it down first, even though it was the second tower hit. If the fire goes out, stories like yours make no sense.
          Of course, the official story makes no sense at every level so this is just another of those senseless details.
          Do you get paid to shill, btw?

      • r2bzjudge knows very well who’s responsible. As does John Little. They’re a team…like pro wrestlers. One handles the technical/scientific aspect, the other handles the religious/political side. Both poorly, I should add. They both get their asses handed to them on a regular basis, yet persist in their meagre efforts unashamedly.
        r2bz pretends to be sympathetic as he throws out a few vanilla comments on issues of no great importance to his handlers, such as: “Thousands of years ago there were no countries.” or “People are aware that the MSM news programs are propaganda.”. But anything smelling of false flag (9/11) or government backed domestic terror (Waco) and he’s right there spewing out his pre-approved list of “facts” and “talking points” and then repeating them nonstop.

        • “r2bzjudge knows very well who’s responsible. As does John Little.
          They’re a team…like pro wrestlers. One handles the
          technical/scientific aspect, the other handles the religious/political
          side. Both poorly, I should add. They both get their asses handed to
          them on a regular basis, yet persist in their meagre efforts
          unashamedly.”
          Jon, you have a vivid imagination. It is you that is having a religious belief in controlled demolition, when no actual controlled demolition video duplicates what happened to the WTC Towers.
          You have no factual leg to stand on.

          • “r2bz pretends to be sympathetic as he throws out a few vanilla comments
            on issues of no great importance to his handlers, such as: “Thousands
            of years ago there were no countries.” or “People are aware that the
            MSM news programs are propaganda.”. But anything smelling of false flag
            (9/11) or government backed domestic terror (Waco) and he’s right there
            spewing out his pre-approved list of “facts” and “talking points” and
            then repeating them nonstop.”
            Jon, there is no pre-approved list of facts, except in your own imagination.
            Three buildings that had totally out of controlled fires, collapsed on 9/11, 2001. Those are not pre-approved facts.
            David Koreshes followers burned down Waco. That is not a pre-approved fact.

          • “They commandeered those tanks to shoot flames at their own buildings. Those sneaky BAStards!!”
            There were no flame throwing tanks. The fires started within the compound, thus it was Koreshes people who started the fires. Koresh effectively did what Jim Jones did.
            Look at video of an actual flame throwing tank when it is throwing flame. None of he Waco footage shows anything resembling a tank throwing flame.
            Your propaganda does not stand up to the truth.

          • “The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly – it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over”
            — Joseph Goebbels
            Come on, let me hear you say “TOTALLY out of control fires” again.

          • ““The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless
            one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly – it must confine
            itself to a few points and repeat them over and over”
            — Joseph Goebbels
            Come on, let me hear you say “TOTALLY out of control fires” again.”
            You can see that for yourself. The NYFD never fought the main body of fire in either Tower.
            The truth is not propaganda. Nor do i confine myself to a few points of truth.
            Why are you fighting against the truth?

          • “You mean like these poor bastards from the NYFD who were sacrificed and
            whose stories are now completely ignored by vicious lying scumbags.”
            Why are you fighting against the truth? The NYFD never fought the main body of fire in either building. The fires in the Towers never had a hose placed on them, except maybe a few spot fires on the 78th floor of WTC2, just before the Tower collapsed.
            The fire had caused a lot of damage just floors above their heads. Columns were bowed in at the 81st floor. Those columns were no longer supporting the east wall above that floor.

          • “You mean columns like these where Edna Cintron is withstanding steel bending heat.”
            Jon, you KNOW which columns i am talking about.
            I identified them. The east wall of WTC2 at the 81st floor. Most of the columns were bowed in and no longer holding up the east wall.
            You also know that Edna was standing at the time, there was not steel bending heat, which is irrellevant to the truth that the fire raged totally out of control, right up to the time that WTC1 collapsed, progressively weakening the structural steel across a continually wider area.

          • “Well, now you’re just being silly.”
            i see you are unable to respond to the truth, with anything other than an emotional comment.
            I talk about the photographed bowed in columns along almost all the east wall of WTC2 at the 81st floor and you try distract with a comment about Edna in the other Tower.
            Where Edna was photographed standing, flight 11 had plowed into the Tower. There was a huge fireball as a result of the crash, yet Edna managed to later stand where she did.

          • “Where Edna was photographed standing, flight 11 had plowed into the Tower. There was a huge fireball as a result of the crash, yet Edna managed to later stand where she did.”
            Now you’re making my points for me as well as being silly.

          • “Now you’re making my points for me as well as being silly.”
            You are making my point for me. You still have not addressed the truth of the bowed in columns at the 81st floor along the east wall of WTC2.
            My guess would be that Edna was in an enclosed room when flight 11 hit the Tower. She was therefore protected from the fireball, just as people in the Windows on the World restaurant survived the fireball blooming up past the 110th floor.
            I haven’t seen it for some time, but i believe that on the east side of WTC1, on the floor which Edna was, there was fire burning out a set of windows, as she was standing in the hole the jetliner left.
            There was a man in an office in WTC2, near where the jetliner struck. He was one of the few at or above where the jet struck the building, and made it out alive. When the jet struck the building there was a huge fireball, yet he was not harmed by it.
            Just after he made it out and away from WTC2, he looked up at it and said he thought the building was going to collapse. just moments later, it did.

          • “Here’s the larger point…which sweeps all of your oh so precious collection of seemingly important details to the floor.”
            You are fooling yourself.
            “Only Standard Fireproofed By Code, Office Contents”
            Look at the videos of the fires. Flames were floor to ceiling AND BEYOND, pouring out windows. The statement in quotes, from the video link, is meaningless, if not outright false.
            For one, paper is an office content. Paper burns. There was also more than paper burning, to cause floor to ceiling flames. Floor to ceiling flames are very hot. They were hot enough to negatively affect the structural steel.
            In WTC2, a floor truss was photographed progressively sagging, just inside a set of windows in the fire zone.
            The true larger point is that fire was the common element in all three buildings which collapsed.
            You are fighting the truth.

    • Israel is trying to re-write history. Orwellian in nature. If they are able, if they can get away with it, they will memory hole every bad news story about Israel and then insert lies. They’ve tried desperately to re-write the JFK story, 9/11, the fed, war history. But, that didn’t work. We now know the truth about Israel:
      “…the US has propped up Israel diplomatically and militarily, the EU has underwritten Israel’s economic success. It has violated its own constitution to give Israel special trading status and thereby turned Europe into Israel’s largest export market. It has taken decades for Europe to even acknowledge – let alone remedy – the problem that it is also trading with illegal Jewish settlements in the West Bank”: http://mondoweiss.net/2016/06/should-disturbed-brexit/#sthash.3SgeDn98.dpuf

    • It’s sarcastic satire or satirical sarcasm. Designed to lure in people believing in the official story and possibly slip a few facts past their defenses before cognitive dissonance takes over and sends them scurrying back to hide behind mommy’s skirt.

      • It is obviously sarchasm, but grasping at straws to paint a picture of controlled demolition, falls rather flat.

        • I love the way you constantly repeat “TOTALLY out of control fires” like some Jedi mind trick. Hate to break it to you, but your writing skills aren’t nearly up to the job.

          • “I love the way you constantly repeat “TOTALLY out of control fires” like some Jedi mind trick.”
            Just repeating the truth. The fires were obviously totally out of control.

          • “Hate to break it to you, but your writing skills aren’t nearly up to the job.”
            I am running rings around your writing.

          • …as far as the facts, actions, behaviors and obvious lies behind the corrupt government account of 911…(which the dippy President refused to testify over unless he had his lapdog Mr. President 2.0, Dick Cheney present…no recordings, no oath, etc.)….information is plentiful, factual and beyond dispute. High-Rise, structural, steel frame buildings do not collapse at free fall speed into their own foot print…even when hit by a plane. The sheer number of coincidences that would have had to happen that day…in order for all of the different elements to come together as they did, would have been impossible without inside knowledge, authority and access to high-explosive Thermite. We know this is what brought down the buildings, as it was found in the metal fragments that had to be sent out of the fascist USA and tested in France. Anyone with half a brain, and a bit of knowledge regarding The NWO, Agenda 21 and the purposeful collapse of the US Economy over the last 30 years knows that the buildings were imploded. Anyone watching the first building collapse, where the huge radio or TV tower on top of the building shifted on it’s base…moved over a bit and then collapsed into the missing space…anyone watching that could tell it had been imploded immediately. The rest was theater, created for fear production and the elite’s 30 years war. People who cannot see that are either dumb, afraid….or a traitor.
            RJ O’Guillory

          • “High-Rise, structural, steel frame buildings do not collapse at free fall speed into their own foot print…even when hit by a plane.”
            No one has said they do.
            The totally out of control fires caused sufficient damage to the structural steel, to result in a catastrophic failure.
            Had there been no fire, the Towers and WTC7 would have been standing at the end of the day.
            The Towers did not collapse at free fall speed. Falling column sections were falling to the ground FASTER than the Towers were collapsing.
            The towers and WTC7 collapsed both within and outside their footprint.
            The “inside their footprint” mantra is empty sloganeering.
            It is something Goebbels would repeat over and over again.

          • …you need a Performance Improvement Discussion with your Troll Supervisor. You are not even god that this job…I’d hate to see what other types of “work” you attempt. We know what happened on 911…and your attempts to sway opinion are for naught…..well, other than entertainment value. I was a Federally Protected Whistle Blower for US DoD for over two decades….I know of quislings such as yourself. They will be the first to go.
            RJ O’Guillory

          • “…you need a Performance Improvement Discussion with your Troll Supervisor”
            How long have you been trolling today?

          • …you are the one employing empty-sloganeering. I understand, they teach you to put the ball in the other guy’s court. Try to keep it there. Insure that that conversation never confirms anything. Stand up to any point you are not being paid to support. I understand. However, you are very ineffective. I gave you multiple examples of how your point-of-view was off-base, yet all you could do is refer to me as some dead Nazi? That is the best you could do? As I said…I worked for US DoD for 24 years, twenty of those years as a Federally Protected Whistle Blower, who won his case without the aid of an attorney. I’ve lived and worked around the world and taught communication skills for international employees of DoD…(even received a personal tour of Air Force One). As I said…I know quislings such as yourself. Your legal turn is coming.
            RJ O’Guillory

          • “…you are the one employing empty-sloganeering.”
            Truth is what i am employing.
            ” Stand up to any point you are not being paid to support.”
            You have such a vivid imagination.
            ” As I said…I know quislings such as
            yourself. Your legal turn is coming.”
            This just makes me laugh. You don’t know quislings at all, if you are claiming i am one.

          • “The sheer number of coincidences that would have had to happen that
            day…in order for all of the different elements to come together as
            they did, would have been impossible without inside knowledge, authority
            and access to high-explosive Thermite.”
            That is Goebbels speaking.
            No explosions were seen just prior to the collapse of the Towers, as would be the case in an actual controlled demo.

          • They were covered in dust as, the building had already fallen. It is not evidence of controlled demolition of the Towers.
            In a controlled demolition, the explosions happen, then the building falls. There were no such numerous timed explosions immediately before the Towers fell.
            The Towers simply collapsed due to the progressive damage caused by the totally out of control fires.

          • “So you’re saying those fires were TOTALLY out of control?!”
            The videos of the fires said the fires were TOTALLY out of control.

          • …as I said…you need a Performance Improvement Discussion. Oh…and to be charged and convicted for treason as well…then hanged.
            RJ O’Guillory

          • “…as I said…you need a Performance Improvement Discussion. Oh…and
            to be charged and convicted for treason as well…then hanged.
            RJ O’Guillory”
            As you said what? The truth contradicts you, as i pointed out.

          • The only reason your posts are half-way intelligent is that half of your posts consist of others writing.

          • “The only reason your posts are half-way intelligent is that half of your posts consist of others writing.”
            Don’t flaltter your imagination.

  11. Of course the Towers didn’t’ collapse.
    We aren’t blind…who failed to notice the buildings turned to dust?
    Ridiculous articles full if false assumptions and stupid errors are designed to distract US.
    The perpeTRAITORS are DESPERATE to hide their dustification weaponry.
    Do NOT make the mistake of ignoring what you saw… you can SEE the dustification in every video

    • Of coarse the Towers collapsed. There are numerous videos showing the towers as they collapsed.
      The Towers did not turn to dust. There was a large pile of debris on the ground, in and outside of each Towers footprint.
      There was a fire in the debris pile for up to a month.
      There was no dustification weaponry. That is someone’s fantasy.
      Things like wall board would have been pulverized and contributed to the dust cloud. A 110 story building had a lot of wall board.

      • …”There was a fire in the debris pile for up to a month”….well, actually…there were liquid, red-hot pools and rivers of molten steel that burned for months after 911. There is plenty of photographic evidence of molten steel pouring though the site…as well as photos of bulldozers clearing piles of rubble months after 911 that were still smoldering and in some cases, still on fire or re-ignited when pulled apart. The only thing that is going to keep red-hot, molten rivers of steel in that condition is Thermite. There are actually photos of the vertical steel beams with perfect angled cuts in them where the thermite went off and cut through the beam, so that the building would shift and drop at that angle. Everyone knows who did 911….even a lot of “uninformed people” know who dd it. It is obvious. We just cannot do anything about it right now. Hopefully soon.
        RJ O’Guillory

        • “..”There was a fire in the debris pile for up to a month”….well,
          actually…there were liquid, red-hot pools and rivers of molten steel
          that burned for months after 911.”
          There were no pools and rivers of molten steel.
          There is photography of pieces of glowing solid steel, but that is all. A pool of molten steel would have solidified and been photographed, if there had been such an oddity.
          “The only thing that is going to keep red-hot, molten rivers of steel in that condition is Thermite.”
          Thermite goes PPPPPPPPPHHHHHHHHHHHHHH and quickly burns out, as it is a rapid chemical reaction. You are attributing something to thermite that it simply doesn’t do. Thermite does not act as a heat lamp.

      • Your 110 storey building lost 109 storeys while we watched for 7.4 seconds. You really missed the best bit of the show, dude 🙂
        I saw the pin sharp photos of what little remained the very next day. The rubble piles were less than one storey high.
        We ALL saw the dust …clouds of dust starting hours before ignition, lasting for days, vast clouds of dust. Never ….NEVER has any controlled demolition caused any dustificstion, ever in the history of blasting old buildings.
        I have no security clearance for revealing here any military secrets re directed energy weaponry, just as I can only GUESS you can no more precisely tell US by exactly what DEW method the WTC site was cleared.
        If you are in the know, then we are EXTREMELY curious to know why the BankersvTrust building got pulled down 5 years after they tried and failed dismally to stop all the structure of that building from continuous corrosion. The BT steel all starting turning to DUST on 9/12/01

        • “I saw the pin sharp photos of what little remained the very next day. The rubble piles were less than one storey high.”
          It took till May the following year to remove all the debris. If the piles were less than 1 story high, how did the fire burn for a month? The total is the sum of its parts.
          “We ALL saw the dust …clouds of dust starting hours before ignition,
          lasting for days, vast clouds of dust. Never ….NEVER has any
          controlled demolition caused any dustificstion, ever in the history of
          blasting old buildings.”
          You must have seen different clouds of dust. After the jetliners struck the Towers, there was smoke.
          When each Tower collapsed there was a dust cloud. Each floor was some 200 feet by 200 feet. That comes to a lot of wall board when multipled by 110 floors. The natural disintegration of the wall board and suspended ceiling tiles, as debris crashed down on each floor space from above, would have generated a dust cloud.
          The fire in the debris pile produced smoke for weeks.

          • You cannot know what you don’t know.
            FIND THE photo of the ambulance still parked next to the rubble pile of an 110 story building, the ambulance is covered with DUST because it parked BEFORE the building was targeted.
            The pile of rubble is not that much taller than the ambulance.
            You seem to have blinked for all the time the dust was being deposited all over Hobokken and beyond…but why insist on the almost complete absence of building bits in the near-zero pile?
            Forget what your mind THINKS it should see.
            Open your eyes to what is clear as Crystal in the photos of the real piles of next-to-nothingness the hour after the buildings vanished

          • When you thought you saw the fire burned for months, you must also have studiously avoided seeing the photo of the firefighting crew walking THROUGH what LOOKED like flames in the rubble.
            My tiny mind interprets that picture totally unexpectedly as, (1) the rubble is very thin on the ground and (2) the flames are so cool they cannot possibly be normal flames from any fire I know.
            But when YOU see the dust-covered ambulence parked next to a pile of rubble scarcely even as high as the vehicle, WHY does your tiny mind refuse to even consider the obvious, inevitable question?
            “Where did the Towers go?”
            If you think the answer is obvious and or easy, you continue (as so many of US do) to avoid asking the difficult-but-all-important question.
            Ask yourself the correct question and you will be one step nearer to discovering you don’t know the right answer.
            HINT As always, Check The Evidence. Take more care before making rash assumptions 🙂

  12. WARNING! r2bzjudge is shilling for Israel! Read his posts below. Same old same old Israeli shill; hurling insults, kicking sand, no rebuttal, like John Little does.
    r2 thinks there is enough fuel in a jet to burn a WTC tower to the ground!
    lol. Israel is getting desperate, sending in their best shills. lol. If that’s they best they’ve got, this next few months will be easy!

    • “WARNING! r2bzjudge is shilling for Israel! Read his posts below.”
      Occam’s Razor is having a moment.
      “r2 thinks there is enough fuel in a jet to burn a WTC tower to the ground!”
      R2 knows you speak with false tongue. You KNOW that is not what i said.
      Neither WTC Tower burned to the ground. They collapsed due to totally out of control fire.

  13. Israel must have invested a lot of money and time in the fraud above, their shills are out in force on this one. Let’s make them work! Double up on your posts:
    Israeli “Mossad Agents” posing as students planted plastic explosives
    and fuses in the WTC buildings. There are photos of this on the web.
    https://chemtrailsplanet.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/911-gelatin-art-students-in-wtc-tower_12.jpg
    Military jets were flown by remote control into the buildings. Ask a pilot.
    A Tesla device was used to vibrate the building into dust as the explosives detonated, quite an attack.
    The Dark Side Of Tesla’s Technology
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btXU4FwygJk
    Israel and the corrupted in the US and international politics and
    banking were all behind it, but Israel was the ring leader, had the most
    to gain, but ultimately, now…they are losing everything, Israel is
    busted big, Israel is defunct, subject to the creator’s judgment.
    Israel, Not In America’s Name, 2016!

    • “Israel must have invested a lot of money and time in the fraud above, their shills are out in force on this one.”
      Comedy.
      “Israeli “Mossad Agents” posing as students planted plastic explosives
      and fuses in the WTC buildings.”
      The photo looks like it shows a strap inside the circle with some kind of a hook attached to it. I don’t know where you fantasize planting plastic explosives out of that.

    • Hey, have you heard the news? Apparently those fires in all 3 buildings were, like, “TOTALLY out of control!!”

      • “Hey, have you heard the news? Apparently those fires in all 3 buildings were, like, “TOTALLY out of control!!””
        An inconvenient truth for you, huh?

        • Look, it’s clear to anyone following this exchange (including your handlers) that huge bloody chunks of your ass lie pulsating on the serving tray being presented before you. Do us all a favor (including your handlers) and stop padding the bill.

          • “Look, it’s clear to anyone following this exchange (including your
            handlers) that huge bloody chunks of your ass lie pulsating on the
            serving tray being presented before you. Do us all a favor (including
            your handlers) and stop padding the bill.”
            It is perfectly clear that you fight the truth.

          • “What’s perfectly clear is that you’re being paid by the word.”
            It is perfectly clear that you have a vivid imagination.

          • “vivid imagination”…another oft repeated phrase. One that you and John Little must have learned together.

          • I keep reading phrases such as the Towers fell at free fall speed, which they did not.
            You do have a vivid imagination. I will stick with the truth.

      • Yeah, and my sister-in-law, she fried like a hotdog! She was Port Authority, saved a lot of lives that day then lost her own… Israel’s goin’ down!

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.