AAAS Science Magazine: Previous Infection Confers Greater Immunity.

Sharing is Caring!

 

www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/08/having-sars-cov-2-once-confers-much-greater-immunity-vaccine-no-infection-parties

The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study that some scientists wish came with a “Don’t try this at home” label. The newly released data show people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were much less likely than never-infected, vaccinated people to get Delta, develop symptoms from it, or become hospitalized with serious COVID-19.

See also  Is the WP starting to follow the science?

So, there you have it. This isn’t some out there on the edge publication. This is the AAAS—

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Association_for_the_Advancement_of_Science

They’re reiterating what many, including me, have been saying for months. My wife, son, and I had the first COVID19 strain and we have antibodies. Moreover, we will likely have lifelong immunity.

www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01557-z

The presence in the bone marrow of long-lived, antibody-secreting memory plasma cells is probably the best available predictor of long-lasting immunity. For SARS-CoV-2, most studies so far have analysed the acute phase of the immune response, which spans a few months after infection, and have monitored T cells, B cells and secreted antibodies7. It has remained unclear whether the response generates long-lived memory plasma cells that secrete antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.

See also  Let's just call this what it is, a culture war. Leave science out of it. This whole thing has hurt science more than reinforce it.

 

h/t HM Murdock

591 views

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.