by Pamela Williams
While most Americans are celebrating the Holidays, the Clintons are mourning their loss of power. They are not taking responsibility of wrongdoing on their part, instead they are playing the blame game. The victims of that game are FBI Director James Comey and the Russians. However, Clinton’s Democratic donors are not buying it, and they do not believe the Russian hacking story. They are demanding an autopsy into the missing billion they contributed to the Clinton campaign. Further, they have threatened an end to the Democratic Party if they do not get what they want. It is my opinion Clinton is up the creek without a paddle. Wow, I wonder how it feels to go to point A to point B so fast…on top of the world one moment and down at the bottom the next.
Clinton recently gave a party for her elite donors at the Plaza in New York. Some said it was more like a wake than a party. There was quiet gossip of even if Clinton, the DNC, and Podesta had been hacked it would not have been a big deal if there had been no wrongdoing to begin with. It must be chilling for the Clintons at this point, and some say Bill Clinton is losing it. It is being reported that toward the end of Clinton’s campaign the “average American” gave small donations to Clinton, but she failed to recognize them at all. However, the elite donors are turning on her, and she has no one to blame but herself. End of my commentary.
Armstrong Economics reports:
The donors are not buying the Russian hack story. Putin isn’t the only explanation for her failure and they are now pointing the finger at Hillary. She never bothered to go to Wisconsin. The story running behind the curtain is that fundraisers are cutting off all donations to the Democratic Party until this honest review is carried out. They do not want to hear about Comey and Putin.
Foreign governments have been cutting off funds to the Clinton Foundation. At last, the money is being cut off. Bill Clinton has lost it, mocking President-elect Donald Trump’s intelligence. “[Trump] doesn’t know much,” Bill Clinton said of Trump. “One thing he does know is how to get angry, white men to vote for him.” Bill is keeping it racist and gender oriented. Obviously, Bill is lashing out because the Clinton money machine came to a screeching halt.
The wealthy Democrats who helped pump over $1 billion into Clinton’s losing effort have been urging their local finance staffers, state party officials, and campaign aides to provide a more thorough explanation of what went wrong. With no dispassionate, centralized analysis of how Clinton failed so spectacularly, they insist, how can they be expected to keep contributing to the party?
“A lot of the bundlers and donors still are in shock and disbelief by what happened. They’re looking for some introspection and analysis about what really happened, what worked and what didn’t,” said Ken Martin, chairman of the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party and a top campaign bundler himself. “It may take some time to do that, but people are still just scratching their heads.” Or, in the words of a Midwestern fundraiser who’s kept in touch with fellow donors, “A lot of people are saying, ‘I’m not putting another fucking dime in until someone tells me what just happened.’”
This is it folks, the beginning of the end for Hillary Clinton. There is no coming back from this. The Democrats have to ditch her and save their party or they risk losing almost all the top donors that they have.
Even the Democrats are finally starting to see what kind of person Hillary is.
Further commentary – Now Hillary Clinton’s attorney David Kendall, who was implicated himself in the investigation into Clinton’s use of her home server passing “classified information”, is complaining about the recent release of the FBI’s email search warrant. I am disappointed to report the following, as the implications are troubling on several fronts:
In a statement, Schoenberg said he saw “nothing to suggest that there would be anything other than routine correspondence between Secretary Clinton and her longtime aide Huma Abedin.”
Brian Fallon, who served as the national press secretary for Clinton’s campaign, said on Twitter the search warrant “reveals Comey’s intrusion on the election was as utterly unjustified as we suspected at time.”
The possible reasons behind President-elect’s decision to keep U.S. Attorney Bharara:
— Michael Benjamin (@SquarePegDem) December 5, 2016
Of President-elect Donald Trump’s nominees so far, the most curious—from a New York perspective—is Preet Bharara, President Barack Obama’s U.S. attorney for the Southern District, who agreed last week to work under Republican Attorney General-nominee Jeff Sessions.
Sen. ?Charles Schumer, who had long ago hired Bharara as his chief counsel, reportedly blessed the deal, lending it an aura of bipartisanship.
The choice indicates that Trump, who has said he will “drain the swamp” in Washington, likes what Bharara has done so far in New York, where he has taken down former state Sen. Majority Leader Dean Skelos, a Republican, and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, a Democrat, among others.?
All this suggests that Bharara will continue to be given wide discretion in how he conducts his job. Some insiders are speculating there could be fallout from Rudy Giuliani’s boast in October about having connections inside the FBI that would affect the election. “We’ve got a couple of surprises left,” the Trump surrogate told Fox News on Oct. 25. Three days later, FBI Director James Comey said agents working on the Anthony Weiner sexting investigation had found emails that appeared relevant to the Hillary Clinton email probe, which he had previously said was closed.
Some former prosecutors believe a Southern District investigation into a possible leak in the Weiner case is imminent, if not already underway. Bharara’s office declined to comment. “A leak of confidential law enforcement information is always troubling because it corrupts the integrity of our criminal justice system and calls its fairness into doubt,” said a former assistant U.S. attorney of the Southern District.
“Nowhere is this more true than when the investigation itself involves allegations of corruption by public officials, because the leaks are inevitably seen as politically motivated attacks.” Giuliani was an effective surrogate but, like Gov. Chris Christie (and perhaps for similar reasons), he seems to have been pushed aside. If an investigation materializes, then Trump—intentionally or not—would really have a bipartisan claim to draining the swamp.
Further commentary: This indicates to me that Preet Bharara will not tolerate leaks of information on his investigations to the public by anyone. Thus, there is no way there will be any leaks on the Clinton Foundation thus coming. If there are, I would take it with a grain of salt. I do believe he is investigating the Foundation, but I do not believe there will be any leaks tolerated. When he indicts…if he indicts, then we will know what is going on. Another aspect of this whole Clinton Foundation alleged investigation…don’t get me wrong…I do believe it is happening, and the alleged evidence is beyond the pale…enough that we simply would NEVER understand if there was no investigation. It is being reported that there is a witness coming forward, who worked in the Foundation, who will testify against Clinton. I cannot help but wonder could it be Eric Braverman? I pray it is. The following was reported on the HANNITY FOX NEWS show:
Ed Klein, author of GUILTY AS SIN, told Sean Hannity that Preet Bharara has lined up a witness to testify against Hillary Clinton in the Clinton Foundation probe. He further says this witness worked inside the Clinton Foundation and knew about the pay to play policy. Hannity went on to ask Klein “are you saying there is a witness willing to testify against Clinton?” Klein said, “that is what my source tells me.”
In conlusion: We need to start praying for Preet Bharara to investigate the Clinton Foundation. Further, we need to pray for this hero in whatever he attempts to do to wipe this Country clean of the fllth it is dealing with. If he needs any motive to investigate the Clinton’s WE THE PEOPLE can give him this:
Russian Plane Shootdown, Morell Again.
Mike Morell “We Should Kill Russians” Charlie Rose Interview Clip – 1:45
Due to the very large number of citations and sources, I now publish them with each slide. I try to order New York Times Pulitzers first, then former NYT Pulitzer winners, then New York Times writers. Any other reputable source like WaPo, WaTimes, Tribune, LA Times, Seattle P-I, etc are then list. Then second tier media followed by alternative media.
Murdered journalist and investigators get a higher ranking than remotely sourced stories through offshore news funnels like SOHR.