DHS: GUN CONTROL Is NOW IN OUR HANDS… Obama Calls for Assault Weapons Ban, New 'No Fly, No Buy' Law… Executive Order, Hand in Assault Weapons by December 31, 2016… HERE COMES THE PUSH FOR INSURANCE ON GUN OWNERS

Jeh Johnson: Gun control is now a matter of homeland security
Just days after the massacre in an Orlando nightclub left 49 people dead and 53 wounded, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson on Tuesday said that gun control is now a critical element of protecting the U.S. homeland and keeping Americans safe.
“We have to face the fact that meaningful gun control has to be a part of homeland security,” Johnson said in an interview on “CBS This Morning.” “We need to do something to minimize the opportunity for terrorists to get a gun in this country.”
On the issue of people on the no-fly list and various other lists being able to purchase a weapon in the U.S., Johnson said, “I believe that that’s something that has to be addressed.”

www.cbsnews.com/news/orlando-nightclub-shooting-jeh-johnson-gun-control-is-now-a-matter-of-homeland-security/
Obama Calls for Assault Weapons Ban, New ‘No Fly, No Buy’ Law
In the aftermath of the Orlando terrorist attack, President Obama today called on Congress to reinstate the assault weapons ban as well as pass legislation to make it harder for suspected terrorists to obtain firearms.
The president said there are a number of “common-sense” gun control measures that Congress should take to reduce gun violence without violating the Second Amendment and, for the first time since the deadly shooting Sunday, he enumerated several steps he wants Congress to take.
“People with possible ties to terrorism who are not allowed on a plane shouldn’t be allowed to buy a gun,” Obama said, referencing “No Fly, No Buy” legislation pending on Capitol Hill that would prevent any suspected terrorists on “No Fly” lists from buying firearms.
abcnews.go.com/Politics/obama-calls-assault-weapons-ban-fly-buy-law/story?id=39846590
Hilary Clinton Calls For Reinstatement of Assault Weapons Ban
During an interview with CNN’s ‘New Day’, Hillary Clinton was asked, “What law would have made this not happen? What law could have made this not a situation where this man was able to get weapons?”
She goes on, “We did have an assault weapons ban for 10-years, and I think it should be reinstated.”

READ  Infrastructure Bills Do Not Lead To Recovery, Only Increased Federal Control

www.wildnkrazy.com/article/mental-case-hilary-clinton-attacks-american-rights/
HERE COMES THE PUSH FOR INSURANCE ON GUN OWNERS (path to registration) :American Medical Association says gun violence is a public health crisis
The massacre in Orlando spurred the American Medical Association on Tuesday to formally call gun violence “a very public health crisis,” and say the organization will “actively lobby” Congress to end a funding ban on federal health research into the problem.
The move by the largest group of doctors in the United States, during a meeting in Chicago, came days after a gunman slaughtered 49 people and wounded 53 others at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, on Sunday morning with a legally purchased AK-47 assault rifle.
“With approximately 30,000 men, women and children dying each year at the barrel of a gun in elementary schools, movie theaters, workplaces, houses of worship and on live television, the United States faces a public health crisis of gun violence,” said the AMA’s president, Dr. Steven Stack.
www.cnbc.com/2016/06/14/american-medical-association-says-gun-violence-is-a-public-health-crisis.html?utm_content=bufferc998f&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Trump on banning assault weapons: ‘I absolutely wouldn’t’


Donald Trump doubled down Monday on labeling the Orlando mass shooting “radical Islamic terrorism,” insisting that his use of the phrase shows his get-tough approach to national security.
He also painted President Obama as unaware of the security threats facing the U.S. because he avoids the phrase.
“He thinks everyone’s just a sweetheart,” Trump said on NBC’s “Today.” “… which I think is insulting to our country and insulting to everybody.”
www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-trailguide-trump-on-banning-assault-weapons-i-1465825225-htmlstory.html

Trump says assault weapons needed for protection


www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/06/13/donald-trump-assault-weapons/85820342/
UFS

4,865 views

34 thoughts on “DHS: GUN CONTROL Is NOW IN OUR HANDS… Obama Calls for Assault Weapons Ban, New 'No Fly, No Buy' Law… Executive Order, Hand in Assault Weapons by December 31, 2016… HERE COMES THE PUSH FOR INSURANCE ON GUN OWNERS

  1. First it was an AR-15. Then it was a Sig Sauer. Now it is an AK. The guy worked for the largest private security firm in the world. They have US government contracts. This guy was checked by Uncle Sam when he got his job some years ago and he passed the FBI background check to buy a firearm. Give me a break. Multiple witness’s say multiple shooters.The press can’t decide what kind of gun. Cops are laughing their asses off behind their chief during a press conference. People carry wounded through the crime scene and drop them off standing and walking when they think they are out of the scene!Very poorly done false flag!

    • Happens to me all the time. The more detailed and factual the less chance there seems to be that it will be posted. I always save a copy before I post and if it gets black holed I post somewhere else.

      • Interesting. I haven’t seen that, yet. I’ve seen a redundant post or two get marked as spam. I’ve had a few deleted. When I first started posting about Israel and hemp and other issues, I got banned and censored all over the place. But, as the information was vetted over time and proven true, I’ve been able to post…95% of the time. Infowars doesn’t respect my free speech, particularly, which is deeeeply troubling. Last time I checked, banned. But, I got the info out there on Infowars before they banned me. A couple of forums still pend and read my comments, but they are now posting my comments.
        BTW, one of the 10 Win 7 updates whacked this computer last night, did a restore quickly, np.

        • Virtually nowhere will take the time to “vett” your comments. If they are against their policies or if their moderators simply don’t like them, they will delete them and ban you. Breitbart, Mother Jones, Crooks and Liars and ABC all fall in this latter category. Virtually nowhere will make the decision based on the acuaracy of the information in the posts.

          • I’ve seen it happen, meaning…posts that were deleted previously are suddenly allowed and then there’s a sudden up-tick in interest in the info and then comments in the forum change to reflect agreement with the controversial info, then related articles pop-up. I’ve seen a lot of care and effort go into forums like this, and yes, some sites, no. Many sites are psyops, all sites monitored, no big deal. If one does the research, you know what’s true and what’s not, who’s for real and who’s not.

      • I think there are keywords that automatically cause the pending. Maybe words like Holocaust, Jews or Israel. Not a huge deal and to be honest completely understandable. Guess I’ll find out when I hit post, lol.

  2. Hmmm
    The President is lying to the American people here:
    “The president said there are a number of “common-sense” gun control measures that Congress should take to reduce gun violence without violating the Second Amendment and, for the first time since the deadly shooting Sunday, he enumerated several steps he wants Congress to take.
    “People with possible ties to terrorism who are not allowed on a plane shouldn’t be allowed to buy a gun,” Obama said, referencing “No Fly, No Buy” legislation pending on Capitol Hill that would prevent any suspected terrorists on “No Fly” lists from buying firearms.
    Again there is no question that the President is lying. The Constitution does not allow either “no fly lists” or bans on specific guns. You see a “no fly list” is unconstitutional because it denies you due process to which you are entitled because the government is trying to take something from you without it. And of course the 2nd amendment has no exceptions, limitations or exemptions of any kind for any reason. Please take a moment to review the 2nd Amendment below to verify that the the President is LYING. His proposal violates the 2nd Amendment because limiting the type or amount “arm” is an infringement, period end of story. Please take not of the fact that the actual 2nd Amendment is never actually provided to the audience in any Main Stream Media discussions. Never. The reason for that is self evident when you actually read the amendment.
    The 2nd Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

  3. Department of Homeland Stupidity strikes again. They still do not have the blessing of the people. And will greatly accelerate the awakening which is already taking a life of its own.

  4. Unconstitutional foreign run agencies trying to pass unconstitutional non-laws and take our Unalienable Rights away. Treason or should I call it espionage. EIther way hang em!

  5. I need a gun to protect myself from the muslims Obama is bringing into the USA Inc. to kill me. After all, I have to protect our glorious homeland!

  6. Yes, terrorists are on the loose, so let’s take away our first and last line of defense, it will make us safer.
    Wherever gun confiscation occurs, genocide always follows.
    I do not consent to gun confiscation.

  7. After all these decades of blatant ignorance, perhaps contrived ignorance I wish the press would try to understand what an “assault rifle” is. An AR-15 looks like a M-16. A M-16 is an assault rifle it can fire fully automatic. Select full auto and hold the trigger back and the M-16 will continue to fire until the magazine is empty.
    The AR-15 cannot select full auto and cannot fire full auto. The AR-15 is NOT an assault rifle.
    Please stop calling for an assault rifle ban what is desired is a RIFLE ban.

  8. This makes perfect sense because we know that everyone on the no-fly list is a bad guy. What? I’m on the ..? WHAT THE HELL AM I DOING ON THE NO FLY LIST!?!?!

  9. no fly no buy, violates due process! executive orders are not an authority granted to anyone in the Constitution. so both are UNCONSTITUTIONAL and of no authority! both violate “shall not be infringed”
    Marbury v Madison; anything repugnant to the Constitution is null and void from it’s inception!

  10. When you protect your house …… do you lock each room, door by door? Each item, one by one? Or do you lock the BORDERS, the FENCES and outside doors? Why is this “government” locking each of us into individual cells instead of locking the BORDERS as any sane person who was ACTUALLY working to protect the House of FREEDOM would do?

  11. To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . .
    . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear
    arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army
    pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows,
    and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege.” [Wilson v. State,
    33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)]
    ‘The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be
    infringed.’ The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys,
    and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such
    merely as are used by the milita, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken
    in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be
    attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally
    necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State
    or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this
    right.” [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)]
    “The provision in the Constitution granting the right
    to all persons to bear arms is a limitation upon the power of the Legislature
    to enact any law to the contrary. The exercise of a right guaranteed by the
    Constitution cannot be made subject to the will of the sheriff.” [People
    vs. Zerillo, 219 Mich. 635, 189 N.W. 927, at 928 (1922)]
    The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of
    himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State
    government. It is one of the “high powers” delegated directly to the
    citizen, and ‘is excepted out of the general powers of government.’ A law
    cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law,
    and independent of the lawmaking power.” [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394,
    at 401-402 (1859)]

  12. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free
    State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
    infringed.”
    Leave US alone, thanks. …international terrorists have breached our borders and you want to take our arms to protects us? lol. fuck you.
    The constant false flags clearly reveal Israel is doing war by deception in the US.
    Israel, Not In America’s Name, 2016!

  13. Doctors and medical mistakes kill more Americans then anything, guess we need to ban them, they are a danger to everyone!

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.