Donald Trump is Not racist: There’s a Reason the Media Want You to Think He Is

by Mark Angelides

For those that cry “racist!” when discussing governmental policy, they should really start looking at what the word racist actually means. It is apparent to most why many in the media would inaccurately use this word. It is powerful, divisive and has a shock value that creates in people a wish to disassociate themselves. And this is exactly why the media and the Democrats are using it so frequently.
What better way to hinder new policy than by encouraging people to stand against it on the grounds of racism.
The New York Times said it, the Hill said it and of course the Huffington post even has a list of perceived racist acts.
What they are really saying is that President’s Trump’s policies are “protectionist”, but they won’t use that word because its implications are (can be) positive. From the globalist standpoint, protectionism is negative, from the individual standpoint; to know that your government is setting out policies to protect your livelihood is positive.
Here are a few of the “Racist” things that Donald Trump has in store for the US:
Protectionist Trade Policy:
Trump’s trade policy has been described as racist by media groups including the Huffington Post (of course) and Salon. Having a trade policy that encourages factories to stay and set up in the US is racist against who exactly? Do non-whites not work in factories? This policy is good for all Americans who rely on a wage packet, blue collar workers come from a multitude of races and countries, protecting their futures is not a bad thing.
The Wall
A wall is not racist. A wall is bricks and mortar. A wall does not pick and choose based on one’s ethnic background. It has been called racist by none other than former Mexican President Vicente Fox. Clearly they don’t mean that the actual wall is racist, but they do mean that his intentions behind the wall are racist.
Firstly, one third of all countries in the world are in the process of either building or maintaining border walls. Are they racist? Was their intent racist?
Bill Clinton received a standing ovation from the Democrats for actually building a wall on the US/Mexican border: 300 odd miles of it. Was he racist? Was his intent racist?
In 2006, Democrat support for a wall included such notables as Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Chuck Schumer. Are they racist? Is their intent racist?
At the end of the day, a country without walls or effective borders will eventually fail. Tax money is spent on services that don’t go to the end user. Schools and hospitals become overcrowded and crime increases. Trump’s decision to build a wall is not racist. It is a logical policy that has few if any negative impacts on US citizens (and that includes legal Mexicans).
“He Has KKK Support”
Well someone had to. No matter what we may think of racist people, to say that they should be denied a vote for their opinions is not constitutional. That David Duke suggested he supports Trump is (or should be) no reflection on President Trump. If we are guilty by association, let’s look at Hillary Clinton’s mentor and friend Robert Byrd, Klan member and recruiter. Or if we are guilty by having supporters who are racist, then Barak Obama should have done a lot more to disavow the Black panthers who supported him.

But in the end, all of these challenges, protests, cries of racism, legal challenges are all just one thing: electioneering. They Globalists are losing their power base and need to get their people back in place. This is nothing but an early campaign.

We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!

18 thoughts on “Donald Trump is Not racist: There’s a Reason the Media Want You to Think He Is”

    • A good question.
      To further test your objectivity in this matter, I challenge you to answer the following questions:
      – do you think an “all-white” jury would give a fair verdict when the victim is white and the accused is black?
      – do you think an “all-black” jury would give a fair verdict when the victim is BLACK and the accused is white?

    • Gonzalo Curiel is a member of LaRaza , whose motto is “For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada.” (“For The Race everything. Outside The Race, nothing.”) Who are the REAL racists here?
      Trump didn’t question Curiel’s integrity because of his Hispanic heritage, but because his membership in an organization that reveals a bias way out of the ordinary – as in reclaiming all Mexican lands “stolen” by the U.S. in the Mexican War of 1846-48.
      Trump was damn well right to question the judge.

    • If you’re not a racist at all, but had everyone on TV smearing you as one, would you want to be handed over to a judge who is a member of the race everyone thinks you hate (even though you don’t)? Or would you be at least a little concerned that the judge have heard about your alleged hate of his race and might be biased against you in return?
      The fact that Trump didn’t want that judge doesn’t make him racist.
      Of course this is not proof that Trump isn’t racist. It’s just proof that if better reasons to accuse him exist, you have to find them.

  1. “It is powerful, divisive and has a shock value that creates in people a wish to disassociate themselves. ”
    No, it’s no longer true now. It’s no more offensive than calling someone a S**t Head, and for the same reasons. It’s a childish epithet for those who disagree with liberal agenda, and by rampant overuse, so diluted as to be meaningless.

  2. Did you notice in the “Lord of the Rings” different groups respected the identity and diversity of other groups ……… EXCEPT for Sauron and his servants (Nazgûl, Orcs, Saruman etc).who were a Fankensteinian MIX of twisted perverted monsters existing only for death and HATE of “MAN” just like the “liberals”/Democrats envision for Humanity right down to an “ALL SEEING EYE” watching everything you do.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.