Encouraging Trade Truce or Insignificant Trade War Pause? Trump and Xi Strike a Deal in Argentina While Cold War 2.0 With China Brews

By Bob Shanahan

President Donald Trump and 20 other world leaders were in Argentina over the weekend. On Friday, Trump signed a new North American trade agreement with Mexico and Canada, replacing the Clinton-implemented North American Free Trade Agreement. While a notable win for the Donald, the more important news that surfaced from the G20 summit was another agreed to trade deal with the U.S. and China.


Chinese President Xi Jingping and President Trump put their debilitating trade war on hold, striking a deal to hold off on adding new tariffs on each other’s goods starting in January to give the two sides more time to reconcile their many differences on trade.


According to a White House readout summarizing the deal, “President Trump has agreed that on January 1, 2019, he will leave the tariffs on $200 billion worth of product at the 10 percent rate, and not raise it to 25 percent at this time.” This will give American and Chinese officials another few months to negotiate issues related to technology, intellectual property, and agriculture. The statement went on to read, “Both parties agree that they will endeavor to have this transaction completed within the next 90 days. If at the end of this period of time, the parties are unable to reach an agreement, the 10 percent tariffs will be raised to 25 percent.”



China has reportedly agreed to purchase a yet to be agreed upon amount of agricultural, energy, industrial, and other products from the U.S. in an effort to reduce the trade deficit between the two countries. The Trump administration has already started tariffs on $250 billion worth of Chinese imports while Xi’s government has leveled tariffs on $110 billion in U.S. goods.


This trade deal was struck while our trade deficit with China rose faster than it has in three years. The U.S. trade deficit widened in July by the most in three years as the gap with China hit a record. The deficit increased 9.5 percent to $50.1 billion, according to the Commerce Department. The impact of tariffs, while necessary to bring China to the negotiating table, will continue to weigh on Trump’s ‘America First’ economy in the final quarter of 2018.


China also agreed to stop exporting fentanyl to the U.S. A statement from White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders, said that Xi, “in a wonderful humanitarian gesture, has agreed to designate fentanyl as a controlled substance, meaning that people selling fentanyl to the United States will be subject to China’s maximum penalty under the law.”


The Chinese government expressed optimism about continuing negotiations with their American counterparts. “The two presidents agreed that the two sides can and must get bilateral relations right,” Wang Yi, China’s lead diplomat, told reporters in Buenos Aires. Wang went on to say, “Discussion on economic and trade issues was very positive and constructive. The two heads of state reached consensus to halt the mutual increase of new tariffs.”


Third parties seemed encouraged by the deal too. Technology trade body ITI said the agreement was “a critical step toward de-escalating the mutually damaging trade war between the world’s two largest economies.


Those in finance, however, were cautiously optimistic. Paul Ashworth of Capital Economists believes Trump cannot always be kept to agreements, referring to a previous deal Trump backed out on with the Chinese. “We suspect that since he negotiated this deal himself, Trump will be much more reluctant to torpedo it when his own personal reputation is on the line,” Ashworth stated.


A rising China has to be dealt with economically. All of these trade tensions are going on in the background of not only a rising China on the world’s economic stage, but also a growing Chinese military looking to expand beyond its borders. The Trump administration and future administrations must do everything they can do avoid a devastating war with China, which would also likely include Russia. With the way things are going in the South China Sea and on trade, we appear to be entering a new Cold War with our counterpart across the Pacific Ocean.


“China is leveraging military modernization, influence operations, and predatory economics to coerce neighboring countries to reorder the Indo-Pacific region to their advantage,” read a recent summary of the 2018 U.S. National Defense Strategy, which went on to say:


“As China continues its economic and military ascendance, asserting power through an all-of-nation long-term strategy, it will continue to pursue a military modernization program that seeks Indo-Pacific regional hegemony in the near-term and displacement of the United States to achieve global preeminence in the future. The most far-reaching objective of this defense strategy is to set the military relationship between our two countries on a path of transparency and non-aggression.”


War with China in the Pacific appears unavoidable. Throughout the world’s history, a top economic power and the rising economic force competing with that top power inevitably go to war for supremacy. Human nature remains the same and China’s ambitions to become the top dog on the world’s stage have been well documented in recent years. Amazingly, the media appears to barely focus on this increasingly important global issue. The U.S. military is dead set on deterring aggression in the Indo-Pacific region as China builds islands with military bases in the South China Sea and looks to expand its military bases in the region.


China has been rumored to be looking to build a military base on Vanuatu, near Australia, and is also funding the redevelopment of a port in Samoa. China also managed sign a deal to build a multi-million dollar port in the strategic country of Myanmar, in the Bay of Bengal wedged between India and Thailand.



While China has been ramping up its military capabilities, it is important to keep things in perspective. The U.S. has more than 1,000 military bases worldwide while China only has one in Djibouti. Though the Chinese are looking to expand their bases and project its might in the South Pacific, they still pale in comparison to what the U.S. military has around the world. It’s also worth noting that the Chinese have only two aircraft carriers and recently announced that it is building its third.


To counter China’s moves in the region, the U.S. and Australia are looking to build a joint naval base with Australia on Papua New Guinea’s Manus Island.


The military industrial complex is still keeping the fear factor going against our Chinese adversaries. According to a recent report by the National Defense Strategy Commission, China is on track to acquire peer military status with the U.S. by 2050.


Neoconservative and rabid interventionist Bill Kristol of the Weekly Standard, tweeted on November 23rd, “Shouldn’t an important US foreign policy goal of the next couple of decades be regime chance in China?” Well, Mr. Kristol, how did regime change go in Syria, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and Iran?


The U.S. needs to wake up to the new reality that China is a force to be reckoned with in the Pacific. Philippines’ president, Rodrigo Duterte, has accepted this new reality. He stated that the South China Sea essentially belongs to China now, calling on “America and everyone else to realize it.”


Problem is, the U.S. will not recognize that reality. Which means, a hot war is coming after the cold war ends and the trade war destroys our economies. When that will occur is anyone’s guess. But to me, it appears inevitable. Unfortunately, I fear it will happen within my lifetime.


Darius Shahtahmasebi concludes, in an RT article, “While the long-term implications in this battle for hegemony are dangerous and more complex than most people are prepared to admit, the rest of us appear to be sleep-walking into what will eventually transform from a Cold War 2.0 into a global conflict of epic proportions.”


Let’s step away from the next world war and finish with trade talks today. Does the trade deal in Argentina amount to anything? Did it accomplish anything significant? Or does it merely delay the inevitable ratcheting up of the tariffs?  


The arrangement provides time for both leaders to make more progress on the great divide between the world’s two largest economies. Despite a long discussion over dinner, all they could agree upon was a pause in the tariffs. No progress appears to have been made on the core issues at the root of all of this.


Michael Every, head of Asia financial markets at Rabobank, put it bluntly when he said, “I will eat my hat if this means anything substantive” as “neither side is fully ready for the war, but neither side will budge.”


All this will do will provide a temporary Christmas rally through the end of the year for two governments that have struggled with some troubling economic news in the last few months.


“The presidents want the markets to enjoy Santa rallies first,” Junheng Li, the founder of the China-focused research company JL Warren Capital told Bloomberg. “And when February comes we can start worrying again.”


The two contrasting worldviews from two completely different cultures make a lasting solution to this trade issue impossible to achieve unless either Trump or Xi backs down. And right now, neither appears willing to do so. Get ready for more tariffs next year!


Follow me @BobShanahanMan


Bob is a freelance journalist and researcher. He remains forever skeptical of the mainstream media narrative and dedicated to uncovering the truth. Bob writes about politics (in DC and CA), economics, cultural trends, public policy, media, history, real estate, Trump Derangement Syndrome, and geopolitics. Bob grew up in Northern California, went to college in Southern California, and lived 4+ years in Seattle. He now lives in sunny Sacramento. His writing also appears in Citizen Truth and has been posted on ZeroHedge and Signs of the Times.



Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.