EPIC: Crowder Destroys Gun Control in 54 Seconds!! | Louder With Crowder

Sharing is Caring!

Steven Crowder goes nuclear on the exploitative gun-control advocates of recent public shooting in under 1-minute.

More than that, more than what is in the Constitution or what is written in any religious book, gun ownership is about self ownership. If you can’t defend yourself against deadly force when met with deadly force, you don’t own yourself. If you don’t own yourself, you can’t possibly own anything else be it your children, house or property. A government telling you that you can’t defend yourself against a criminal, rapist, murderer, kidnapper, or any kind of armed thug is telling you that you don’t own your own body. Any government with that much power has total control over its people. At that point the people are nothing more than a resource, subservient cattle and whether they’re put out to pasture to feed peacefully, mass murdered like in Russia, or fed to the savages like in South Africa, is a decision not made by the people anymore. Rather, it is made by those like Pelosi, Bush, Sanders, McCain and Clinton.
 
h/t TheWheelofTime

See also  Manipulation And Control how its being done a hypnotherapist point of view.
See also  Central Bank Digital Currencies: A Future Of Surveillance And Control
993 views

1 thought on “EPIC: Crowder Destroys Gun Control in 54 Seconds!! | Louder With Crowder

  1. There has never been a government that banned it’s own ARMED FORCES from “Keeping and Bearing” ARMS.
    Find one government in the history of humanity that felt a need to document a “RIGHT” for it’s ARMED FORCES to possess ARMS.
    Oppressive Governments are ALWAYS banning the People’S RIGHTS to arms.
    The claim that the Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to give Our ARMED FORCES a “right” to keep and carry ARMS is S-T-U-P-I-D.
    The only reason for the Second Amendment is to clearly spell-out the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of INDIVIDUALS to keep & bear ARMS.
    The only reason for the BILL(list) of RIGHTS was to codify INDIVIDUALS’ GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
    Has there ever been a government that was not chock full of it’s “rights” up to and including declaring itself to be the Lord God Almighty?! (Rome, Egypt, Israel,etc)
    Does the 1st Amendment mean the GOVERNMENT is allowed to give speeches? Try shutting up any Politician. But THEY would LOVE to shut YOU up, hence the FIRST Amendment.
    Anyone who tells you the 2nd Amendment applies to the Army or State Militia, is telling you they think you are STUPID.
    There has NEVER been a government that felt it had to codify it’s army’s/soldier’s “RIGHT” to “Keep and BEAR ARMS” because there has NEVER been a government that refused to allow It’s own soldiers to KEEP and BEAR ARMS!
    The Second Amendment was given to the People, like all the other rights in the Bill or Rights. This was confirmed by the SCOTUS in the DC vs Heller decision, where they stated that the “People” in the Second Amendment were the same “People” that are mentioned in the First and Fourth Amendment.
    The 2nd Amendment clearly guarantees the “right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms”, and certainly not “the Militia”.
    Why would “the Militia”, a type of army manned by citizen-soldiers as opposed to full-time “regulars”, need a constitutional amendment to guarantee they have the right “to keep and bear arms”?
    Is there any specific statement anywhere in the Constitution that the army Congress is empowered to raise has the “right to keep and bear arms”?
    Of course not. …………. That is assumed.
    “The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” — Thomas Jefferson
    It is implicit in the nature of all kinds of armies —- be they militia or regulars, volunteer, conscripted, or mercenary — to be armed.
    They are all “armed forces”.
    They all “bear arms”.
    They all carry guns.
    That is what they do.
    It certainly no more requires an amendment to the Constitution to state that “the Militia” has the RKBA , than a specific statement that the army Congress is empowered to raise may be manned by armed troops.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.