by Pamela Williams
I intend to use research from my past reports to prove James Comey has permanently damaged the integrity of the United States. Further, he cannot be taken seriously, and not only should he have been fired; but after his testimony from June 8, 2016 on Capitol Hill, a special prosecutor should be appointed to investigate Comey’s crimes. He is plainly guilty of treason against the United States! He has proven he is unprofessional and mishandled each and every task given to him as Director of the FBI. I am sick and tired of this ongoing narrative by unprofessional lawmakers, who simply hate President Trump and have no actual evidence of his wrongdoing. In fact, there is evidence of their wrongdoing!
James B. Comey was sworn in on September 4, 2013 as the seventh FBI Director in the Bureau’s modern era. In his oath he swore: I, James B. Comey, [Attorney General Eric Holder: do solemnly swear] do solemnly swear [Holder: that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States] that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States [Holder: against all enemies, foreign and domestic] against all enemies, foreign and domestic…
Comey broke his oath of office as FBI Director in the following ways:
- He conducted a faux investigation into the State Department email scandal in which dozens of confidential and top-secret emails passing through an unsecured, private server put our national security at risk.
- He handed out immunity deals to most of the major players involved in the investigation. He ignored evidence to protect the Clinton Team from prosecution. He put President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton’s political legacy ahead of the law.
- He made secret deals to destroy evidence, thwarting congressional subpoenas. That’s called OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE! It’s a crime. James Comey violated the law. He violated his oath of office. It’s corruption at the highest level.
If President Trump had not fired James Comey, there were grounds for impeachment!
Here are the facts:
On July 5, 2016 FBI Director Comey delivered a statement conceding that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had engaged in “extremely careless” behavior by transmitting classified information through her unsecured personal email system. The FBI’s investigation was initiated because of a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General. The FBI sought to determine whether there was evidence that classified information was improperly stored, transmitted, mishandled or, alternatively, whether such information was knowingly removed from appropriate systems or storage facilities. FBI Director Comey conceded that at least 100 emails in 52 email chains on Mrs. Clinton’s email system contained classified information at the time they were sent or received. After admitting that there is evidence that Mrs. Clinton and her aides were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information and after finding evidence that potential violations of the statutes regarding classified information occurred, Director Comey declined to make a criminal referral to the Department of Justice. He stated that “no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.” Despite mountains of incriminating evidence, and despite the March 2015 issuance by Congress of a subpoena to Mrs. Clinton to produce documents, Director Comey stated that criminal charges could not be brought because the evidence failed to support an inference of intentional misconduct.
This is an outrage and the passage of time shows that the FBI and the Justice Department were actively complicit in ensuring that this investigation was never going anywhere. As it turns out, the FBI engaged in conduct that prevents Congress from exercising its constitutional duties.
It was a faux investigation from the very beginning. The relevant statute (18 U.S.C. 793(f)) does not have an intent requirement. That’s why the FBI never reviewed former Secretary of State Clinton’s sworn testimony to Congress despite the fact that any reasonable prosecutor knows that false testimony constitutes circumstantial evidence of intent.
After the New York Times reported in March 2015 that Secretary Clinton had a private email system, Clinton aide Cheryl Mills engaged in affirmative behavior that led to the destruction of relevant evidence. There was already a congressional subpoena outstanding relating to the Benghazi investigation, but that didn’t stop members of Clinton’s team from deleting emails from the server. We also know that other Clinton aides destroyed some mobile devices with hammers.
You can’t make this up. But every day, every hour, it seems we find out yet even more details that make this even worse. How could FBI Director James Comey have turned a blind eye to all of this? Because he was a part of the cover-up.
Now we know that the FBI signed secret side deals with Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson – the two lawyers in charge of sifting through Clinton’s emails – to not only give them immunity for their laptops, but to also destroy the laptops and evidence after the investigation concluded. But the investigation wasn’t even thorough BECAUSE they promised them they wouldn’t look at any data after January 31, 2015, meaning they wouldn’t look at anything after the news of the private email server became public.
So the FBI couldn’t have ever found any evidence about obstruction of justice or destruction of evidence. And now Congress can’t find it as part of its investigations – because the FBI destroyed the evidence as part of the immunity deal and side deal with Clinton aides.
The latest reports involve missing “bankers boxes” filled with former Secretary Clinton’s emails and evidence of tampering with those emails to try to change classification designations. Not surprisingly, one of the lawyers involved in this latest report was at the State Department during the email scandal and had previously served at the IRS during the Lois Lerner scandal.
And now there is evidence that the Obama White House coordinated with the Clinton campaign in early 2015 regarding how they would all handle any fallout from the revelations about former Secretary Clinton’s private email server.
This is not difficult. It’s clear that the FBI was compromised and more concerned with politics than following the law.
How else can you explain the FBI destroying evidence subject to congressional subpoenas? 18 U.S.C. § 1519 deals with the destruction of evidence:
Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
18 U.S.C. 1512(c) deals with obstruction of justice:
Whoever corruptly alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
It is clear that FBI Director Comey participated in actions that sabotaged both an ongoing Congressional investigation and an impartial criminal investigation into former Secretary of State Clinton’s use of an unsecured server to transmit classified information. Since the FBI actively participated in both the obstruction of justice and the destruction of evidence relating to a constitutionally recognized congressional subpoena, and since it is clear that every other American who engaged in such conduct would face criminal charges within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. section 1519 or 18 U.S.C. section 1512(c) for destroying evidence, impeding an ongoing investigation or impairing the integrity of an official proceeding, this beyond a shadow of a doubt signifies that James Comey is guilty of intentional misconduct and obstruction of justice.
Further he used the FBI, the highest police agency in the United States, as his own personal means to manipulate the law and to corrupt the Judicial System of the United States. We the people, as part of the citizenry of the United States, are called to uphold our jury duty from time to time. Most of us have participated in the judicial process due to this duty. I, for one, have done so. As I deliberated with my peers during my jury duty, I found the process a fair and valid one. Not only did I take this responsibility very seriously, my fellow jury members did, also. We requested to review certain evidence even after it was presented to us in court. A debate was ongoing between us, and this process proved to me that the Judicial System of the United States was one to be proud of.
As a law abiding citizen of the United States I resent the fact that my Judicial System has been raped and violated by Ex-FBI Director James Comey. I further resent that a once solid and respected FBI Agency of the United States is no longer one that the American people can trust or respect. All of this was done under the leadership of James Comey. Further he did this under the disguise of a law abiding, well respected, and skilled lawyer. He is no such thing; therefore, he is an imposter and was chosen to lead the FBI under the Obama Administration, which involves Obama in putting the FBI under the leadership of an imposter of the law. I demand a valid and mandatory investigation into this violation of the Constitution and Judicial System of the United States!
The article by aclj.org/executive-power/fbi-director-james-comey-has-to-go was used as a well respected reference in the above material.
Now onto the nightmare that James Comey has put the Presidency of the United States into, as many citizens slept, trusting their hard earned right to vote was protected and respected by the highest law abiding Agency in the United States. As voters in the elections of officials to represent we the people in our own government of the United States, we have been neglected and lied to not only by James Comey and the FBI, but also by those officials we elected to lead us in our Judicial System of this once respected Country.
These officials continue to violate our trust by allowing James Comey, a criminal no longer in good standing in the government of the United States, to tear down our elected 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. He fired James Comey, and he performed his duty as President in doing so. He is the only elected official to do what was clearly in line with the law of the United States.
This magnificent piece of art was taken from: theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/trump-lion-8.jpg
At one point in his political life Comey may have been a White Hat, but there’s no doubt his behavior is exactly what a black hat operative would be doing to shield his connection to the black hat activity of the prior administration.
Hillary Clinton political operatives manufactured the illusion of a computer connection between Russian entities (financial banks) and the Trump campaign/organization. Those manufactured points of evidence were then passed along to White House entities who used the political intel community (Clapper to Comey) to open an investigation of nothingness – to nowhere.
The mere existence of that investigation was then used as the originating point for a series of media intel leaks (the narrative) intended to cloud and damage the Trump campaign/organization. FBI Director James Comey, as head of one of the investigative agencies, became part of that political apparatus.
I would like to refer back to a certain fact I uncovered which clearly proves James Comey failed in his sworn duty as the Director of the FBI in upholding the protocol as FBI Director.
Now, on to more evidence of the treason committed by James Comey against the United States:
1.Obama-era Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified under oath that there was no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.
However, the following has taken place:
The FBI and two congressional committees continue to investigate the extent of Russian activities. The media and Democrats, sensing that people are not buying their first false Russian claim, have turned to an unnamed source who cites an unseen memo to make their second false claim. They allege that Trump disclosed confidential information to high-level Russian officials. No independent evidence to date corroborates the assertions.
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, who were actually in the meeting, publicly deny the reports.
- Comey firing and memo:
In Comey’s effort to delegitimize Trump and encourage a never-will-happen impeachment proceeding, he claims that the as-yet-unseen Comey memo is evidence of obstruction of justice.
Oddly enough, the unobservant media failed to acknowledge that an actual witness testified under oath before the Senate. In a recent hearing, Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe said, “There has been no effort to impede our investigation today.” That’s right – the FBI testified under oath that there has been no obstruction of the investigation.
If Comey believed that any conversation he had with Trump constituted obstruction, he was obligated to report the offense to his superior (See 18 U.S.C. Section 4).
I WANT TO REPEAT THIS LAST SENTENCE: IF COMEY BELIEVED THAT HIS CONVERSATION WITH TRUMP CONSTITUTED OBSTRUCTION, HE WAS OBLIGATED TO REPORT THE OFFENSE TO HIS SUPERIOR (SEE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 4).
18 U.S. Code § 4 – Misprision of felony
Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §?330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
I have presented enough evidence of the crimes of James Comey for a court of law to find him guilty of treason and incompetence while Director of the FBI. Further narrative and the ongoing respect being paid to Comey by his peers on Capitol Hill makes these very same officials of the US Government guilty of aiding and abetting James Comey in his façade of lies and false testimonies.
President Trump has been vindicated of obstruction of justice by James Comey in these false testimonies on Capitol Hill. Comey is a very cowardly but skilled liar and imposter that has destroyed the integrity of the United States Judcial System, the integrity of the United States, and lack of respect given to the citizenry of the United States.
I want him investigated by a special counsel now! I am also calling for certain lawmakers on Capitol Hill, who have encouraged Comey to be investigated, also.
Those lawmakers are:
- Adam Schiff
- Al Franken
- John McCain
- And Paul Ryan.
Thank you for reading and considering my report on the crimes of James Comey, which I believe should be investigated now by a special counsel of the United States Judicial System.
Published on Jun 8, 2017
Todd Shepherd for the Washington Examiner reports, Former FBI Director James Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee that he personally directed the leak to a reporter of a memo he kept regarding that detailed a conversation he had with President Trump.
Read More/Source/Credit(FAIR USE):
Related Posts:If everyone who reads our story, who likes it, helps fund it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as $10, you can support the IWB – and it only takes a minute. Thank you. 1,424 views