by Ruby Henley
It has recently been revealed that the fake Steele dossier was actually created as an insurance policy to use against Trump If he did, in fact, beat Hillary. This has never been attempted in history, so why now?
Never in history have so many become emboldened against a President. The Dems thought they had the Presidency wrapped up in a neat little package to hand over to the New World Order. Hillary was the Golden Girl who would make that happen – now it is Nancy Pelosi.
In fact, that is what President Trump has fought against, and that is why he is so hated by the elite of this Country and the very World. The only ‘wall’ standing between the citizens of the United States and the New World Order takeover is President Trump.
Hillary Clinton was waiting in the wings to hand us all over to the likes of George Soros and Tom Steyer. Right now Tom Steyer is running an advertisement on the Tube asking that the American people join him to impeach President Trump.
Later in this article we will discuss Tom Steyer.
On Aug. 15, 2016, two weeks after the evil FBI agent, Peter Strzok, launched ‘Operation Crossfire Hurricane,’ the investigation into Russia and the Trump campaign, he texted to his girlfriend: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”
Documents related to a legal finding in British courts reveal that Strzok’s “insurance policy” was put together months before and implemented by the Clinton presidential campaign.
The Washington Times recently reported that Christopher Steele, the former MI6 agent who worked for Fusion GPS, was bought and paid for with Clinton campaign funds to create the fake Russian “dossier.”
He was hired to undermine the legitimacy of Donald Trump should he become the President of the United States instead of Hillary Clinton. He did his job well.
Who is Tom Steyer? First of all, he hates President Trump, and he has pledged to drive him from the Presidency. He has contributed tens of millions of dollars to the Left, and he is only getting started.
After making a fortune as a San Francisco hedge-fund manager, he recreated himself as a philanthropist, environmental crusader and, most recently, tormentor of Trump, whom he describes as “lawless, reckless” and “dangerous.”
Steyer traveled the country last year and spent millions on TV ads promoting the President’s impeachment, gathering millions of signatures in an online petition. The strange thing is he has made no friends with Democratic leaders especially House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Steyer backed a voter approved campaign to increase taxes $1 billion for out-of-state corporations to pay for conservation and alternative energy programs. However, he was less successful in 2014, when he spent $74 million in a failed effort to make climate change a key issue in the midterm campaign.
Steyer is a strange and unpredictable bird. He has failed to put his money behind any of the many Democrats eyeing the White House, saying an endorsement would be premature. “I don’t know what the field of 2020 candidates is,” he said. “Before I would even comment I’d like to see who actually declares for the presidency and what they have to say.”
Does Tom Steyer have any friends? Yep, you guessed it – George Soros and Tom Steyer are joining forces.
Laura Ingraham said far-left billionaires and big Democratic donors George Soros and Tom Steyer are uniting to remake America in their vision.
They pooled their financial resources to support Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She won.
www.rawstory.com/2019/01/fox-news-goes-newly-elected-rep-alexandria-ocasio-cortezs-socialist-agenda/
In an interview with Anderson Cooper, which aired last week on “60 Minutes,” the freshman congresswoman argued that high tax rates on the super-rich could help fund the “Green New Deal” — an ambitious plan to combat the threat of climate change.
The 29-year-old Democratic socialist said the “Green New Deal,” which aims to eliminate carbon emissions within 12 years, is “going to require a lot of rapid change that we don’t even conceive as possible right now.”
“What is the problem with trying to push our technological capacities to the furthest extent possible?” Ocasio-Cortez asked.
To pay for the deal, Ocasio-Cortez pointed to the progressive tax rate system in the 1960s, proposing the idea tax as high as 70 percent on the super-rich.
“You know, you look at our tax rates back in the ’60s. And when you have a progressive tax rate system, your tax rate . . . let’s say, from zero to $75,000, may be ten percent or 15 percent, et cetera,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “But once you get to, like, the tippy tops, on your ten-millionth dollar, sometimes you see tax rates as high as 60 or 70 percent.”
Ocasio-Cortez’s socialist policies also came under scrutiny Monday on FoxNews.com, where the conservative writer Michael Knowles called the freshman congresswoman “frequently-wrong but never-in-doubt” in an opinion piece titled, “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the voice of an ignorant generation.”
“Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s ignorance of economics and foreign affairs typifies her generation. Despite holding expensive degrees in both Economics and International Relations from Boston University, Ocasio-Cortez threw up her hands in exasperation during an interview on Margaret Hoover’s ‘Firing Line’ program, laughing, ‘I’m not the expert on geopolitics,’” Knowles wrote. “Fortunately for her, in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king; and among a blithely ignorant generation, the lightly educated activist is congresswoman.”
“Socialism is an economic disease born of envy and ignorance. Unfortunately both abound in our present politics. The sickness has found an attractive spokeswoman—perhaps, sadly, the voice of her generation,” Knowles concluded.
Joseph Lieberman, a former Democratic vice presidential candidate and Connecticut senator (first Democratic then independent) who wrote a Wall Street Journal editorial criticizing Ocasio-Cortez last month, told Salon’s Matthew Rozsa why the antipathy toward Ocasio-Cortez from the right is so strong.
“She challenges a lot of policy assumptions that are held dear on the right in American politics, including the market economy, the limits on government spending, involvement in internationalist foreign policy including support for Israel,” Lieberman said. He added that “the other thing going on” is how Republicans seem to believe that “the publicity she’s getting is ultimately a vulnerability for the Democratic Party in the midterm elections . . . if she can be made the face of the Democratic Party.”
Now you know who is behind Ocasio-Cortez, and they must be really excited. She is a dream come true for Steyer and Soros.