“It’s Not Immoral for One Human to Own Another Human”: GEORGETOWN PROFESSOR Defends Slavery And Rape! UNBELIEVABLE!

by Pamela Williams
We know that most Professors seem to be Liberals, so we are used to hearing what they teach. However, the following crosses the line in so many ways. We need to know what our college students are being taught. I made the statement today to my husband: “We are in so much trouble in our society right now, but think about what it will be like when the next generation takes over.” In saying that, I want to explain myself. The effect we will be seeing when the next generation takes over is what this generation has taught them. The following statements I am making hopefully will not offend any of you, but I am observing the Liberals who have taken over in our society. I am observing how they are rioting, working against President Trump, refusing to accept the people’s vote, and an issue I have been researching is rampant child abuse. Unfortunately, the young people living within the present society are being led astray by the rampant evils that exist in this world here and now. We have to do what we can to touch each child in a positive way, for every small action has an effect even if we do not realize it.
brown
counterjihadreport.com/2017/02/12/its-not-immoral-for-one-human-to-own-another-human-georgetown-prof-defends-islamic-slavery-rape/
1. This comes from the account of Umar Lee, a Muslim student who was offended by how far Jonathan Brown went in defending slavery and rape.
2. In the era of the campus trigger warning, rape culture and renaming buildings named after slave owners, Brown offered a spirited defense of slavery and rape.

“Consent isn’t necessary for lawful sex” said Professor Jonathan Brown of Georgetown University.”

Wow, that statement is just what our young people need to hear from a so-called college professor. He goes on to say, “consent is a modern Western concept and only recently had come to be seen as necessary.” (perhaps around the time feminism began to take root and women decided they wanted autonomy over their bodies). Brown went on to elaborate, ” consent wasn’t necessary to moral and ethical sex and that the morality of sex is dependent on the lawfulness of the sex-partner and not consent upholding the verdict that marital-rape is an invalid concept in Islam.”
He went on to say in his lecture: “It’s not immoral for one human to own another human” Brown stated in his clearest defense of slavery. Brown went onto state that being an employee is basically the same as being a slave…”
On Brown’s Facebook, it can be read: “it’s not possible to say that slavery is inherently absolutely categorically immoral in all times and places since it was allowed by the Quran and the Prophet”
Muslim student, Umar Lee, was upset and went on to record another quote from Brown’s Facebook: “Slave women do not have agency over their sexual access, so their owner can have sex with them.”
Brown’s problem here is obvious. If Mohammed allowed slavery, it can’t be wrong. The same goes for rape. He has to find a way to justify an Islamic practice by attacking our value system. In my opinion, as I am writing this, he is actually doing the West a favor by revealing the true evil of Islam. I do not mean to offend anyone, but if this is what Mohammed taught, he was evil…bottom line.

(Bonus points for spotting which global symbol of Islamist oppression and hate is being used by Brown in this screenshot.)
counterjihadreport.com/2017/02/12/its-not-immoral-for-one-human-to-own-another-human-georgetown-prof-defends-islamic-slavery-rape/
Further said by Brown: ” Slave rape’ is a tough term to decipher from a Shariah perspective. A male owner of a female slave has the right to sexual access to her. Though he could not physically harm her without potentially being held legally accountable if she complained, her ‘consent’ would be meaningless since she is his slave.”
He ended his lecture by questioning if any of us are truly autonomous:
“And this obsession with thinking of slavery as property it’s [unintelligible]. I think that’s actually a really … odd … and … and … and unhelpful way to think about slavery, and it kind of gets you locked in this … way of thinking where, if you talk about ownership and people … that you’ve already transgressed some moral boundary that you can’t come back from. But I don’t think that’s true at all. Uh, [unintelligible] I’m trying to think about what slavery actually means, and to show that it doesn’t really … the term doesn’t really mean anything. Uh, that it … it that there’s … so many different phenomena that we would lump under this”
” So … the idea of someone who is a by-definition non-consensual sexual actor in the sense that they have been entered into a sexual relationship … in a position of servitude. That’s … sort of … ab initio wrong. The way I would respond to that is to say that … as … I mean this is just a fact. This isn’t a judgment, this is a fact, okay? For most of human history, human beings have not thought of consent as the essential feature of moral … of morally correct sexual activity. And second … we fetishize the idea of autonomy, to the extent that we forget … again, who’s really free? Are we really autonomous people? And what does autonomy mean?”
Wow, who is really free? Most of us are free to make choices in our lives, but according to Brown’s lecture women are certainly not free to say, “no”. We knew that Islam oppresses women…we knew that, but we did not expect a professor from the West to so bluntly declare that none of us are really free, so just go ahead and condone human trafficking and rape. Is that not what he is saying? The topic I have been painfully researching: human trafficking…basically slavery…is perfectly fine with Professor Brown. AND a woman does not have the right to say, “no”, or a man has the right to override that “no” and go ahead and rape her. Am I getting this right? If I am confused, please feel free to correct me.
I will not say to please anyone that I can understand or condone Islam, and I would always be open to debate anyone who does. That is their choice, and it is my choice to not condone it. Liberals are truly destroying the society we live in by simply having no morals to uphold it. One has to have a compassion and divinity inside them to guide their path. We have to have an inner compass that points to God/Creator/Source…a higher being who loves us. Even though society does not express enough love to warm us, a belief in a higher power does. That leads humanity toward the hope of salvation even when walking through hell on earth, and believe me…many are walking through hell right now.
Liberals want to perpetuate that hell to produce chaos and pain. It could be they are innately evil, as they themselves have never known anything else, or they truly want to divide and conquer….to kill those who do not join them in their evil acts, which they do not plan on stopping. No one can truly understand another, as we cannot walk in their footsteps. But I do know right from wrong, good from evil, and I have made my choice of which path I walk. It grieves me to know that many young people are in the process of making choices right now, and teachers are the most influential of all. Professor Brown is making the world a more dangerous place for those seeking to do no harm.
Source:
counterjihadreport.com/2014/05/08/islam-slavery-and-rape/
The following video explains Islam in a way a layman can understand.