Judge Says an AI Can’t Be an Inventor on a Patent Because It’s Not a Person

Sharing is Caring!

“The unequivocal statements from the Federal Circuit that ‘inventors much be natural persons’ and ‘only natural persons can be inventors’ supports the plain meaning of ‘individual’ in the Patent Act,” the judge ruled.

See also  Fed will never taper because consequences will be ‘catastrophic’ – E.B. Tucker

Thaler created a “creativity machine” called DABUS that “invented” a beverage container and a “device for attracting enhanced attention.” Abbott and his team filed applications in 17 jurisdictions around the world listing DABUS as the inventor.

See also  CNBC 2 months ago: " You're saying move money to China, because it's safer?"

The case is Thaler v. Hirshfeld, 20-903, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria)

www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-03/only-humans-not-ai-machines-can-get-a-u-s-patent-judge-rules

403 views

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.