Kim Fox basically admitting that evidence said he was guilty but still let him go anyway

by Upupabove

Video with Kim Fox on Jussie Smollett, basically saying that evidence was enough that he could have been found guilty, but she chose an alternative method. How is it in her their power to decide that? He committed several crimes. Remember yesterday there was posted an internal email for them asking for examples of when this had been done before to make it seem like this is normal, it isn’t.

Why is this ok:

“A prosecutor doesn’t have to give an explanation. That’s part of their discretion. They can decide to charge, drop charges. And they never really have to give a reason,” Gershman said. “But when prosecutors make decisions like this, I think the public demands a clear, fuller explanation.”

How much corruption could be done with leeway like this?