Obama Administration Proposes 2,300-Page "New Constitution"

by Charles Hugh-Smith
The U.S. Constitution leaves too many areas open to interpretation; a New Constituion of 2,300 pages (+ 200 redacted secret pages) is the solution.
The Obama Administration has proposed replacing the current U.S. Constitution (4,543 words, including the signatures with a 2,300-page “new Constitution” that in the words of an administration spokesperson, “clears up the gray areas in the current Constitution.”
The proposal was launched after the success of two recent 1,000+ page pieces of legislation, the Affordable Care Act and the Dodd-Frank financial reform act.
An additional 200+ pages of the “new Constitution” are redacted due to the sensitive nature of the National Security-related amendments.
Lobbyists from key industries were invited to contribute amendments to the new Constitution;” constitutional legal experts were also invited to submit improvements to the current law of the land.
Some critics who have reviewed the 2,300 pages of the proposed “new Constitution” have stated that the document is impenetrable even to those with law degrees. Average citizens “will be unable to understand the laws that govern their lives.”
Other observers note that the complexity and length of legislation such as the Affordable Care Act and the Dodd-Frank financial reform act are already beyond the comprehension of all but a handful of experts.
An administration spokesperson defended the proposed re-write on the grounds that “the new Constitution will provide the clarity that people want in their Constitution.”
NOTE: this is a parody/satire.
Posts and email responses will be sporadic in October due to family commitments. Thank you for your understanding.

We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Views:

396 thoughts on “Obama Administration Proposes 2,300-Page "New Constitution"”

        • Many of those who fought with our Founders lost their lands, their families, and their lives. “These
          are the times that try men’s souls. The
          summer soldier and the sunshine patriot
          will, in this crisis, shrink from the
          service of their country; but he that stands
          by it now, deserves the love and thanks of
          man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not
          easily conquered; yet we have this
          consolation with us, that the harder the
          conflict, the more glorious the triumph.
          What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too
          lightly: it is dearness only that gives
          every thing its value. Heaven knows how to
          put a proper price upon its goods; and it
          would be strange indeed if so celestial an
          article as freedom should not be highly
          rated.”

          Thomas Paine, “The Crisis”, December 23rd,
          1776

          Reply
        • Gary was talking to Dean. Dean was talking about starting a revolution against Obama. Your post is completely off base, because Gary was talking as a patriot. The patriot that you wish you could be.

          Reply
          • You lose all credibility, and sound like a liberal when you use offensive language. No matter how truthful Or valid the statement – many will not hear anything you say when you talk like that.
            Remember, WE have to be the civil ones, and not stoop to their level.

          • I re-read my statement; it’s fine! Was “completely off base” your challenge, or “The patriot you wish you could be” the challenge, or were you meaning to reply the notpatriot101?

        • Keep a civil tongue in your mouth, sir. You are in the company of God-loving patriots, & we don’t deserved to read the foull speech such as the commies espouse,

          Reply
          • Who gives a fuck if you’re offended? Seriously. If you don’t like it… ignore it. Why the fuck should he or anyone else change the way they communicate just because YOU don’t like it? Booohooo… you’re butthurt on the interwebs. I can’t stand people like you and your religious bullshit.

          • I can’t stand people like you who are unable/unwilling to express yourself without profanity. It’s about respect; self-respect and respect for others.
            No matter what your political or ideological leanings, your lack of respect speaks for itself……and it says, “My mental capacity is limited to and by profanity.”
            It’s quite sad.

          • With brute honesty, you can have a profound mental capacity and vocabulary even if you swear like a sailor. Your logic simply implies that you think you’re better than those who swear.

          • How about when your emotions and feelings are so raw and egregious
            that those words really do express perfectly what someone is feeling?
            It’s an expression of frustration and despair unparallelled by any other
            words. Simply put you talk nice and nobody listens, you talk louder and
            nobody listens, you scream and nobody listens, you finally lash out and
            all of a sudden you’re the bad guy. Quite frankly this country is on
            the verge of lashing out, and holier than thou types are sipping their
            lattes looking down their noses. Well I have news for you my friends,
            when this finally explodes I’ll be exceptionally entertained by what
            will be coming out of your mouths then.
            Go back to your lofty perch and go back to sleep.

          • I agree with what you say. However, some people use these words all over the place, not just to punctuate a point. When the F word is as much of the speech as the word “the” it is a little too much.

          • Kevin,
            I just noticed, that even thou you were reprimanding the one’s that are asking for a civil tongues. You made an excellent point WITHOUT using profanity! If you can do it and have the ability to think and express yourself and your frustration without using it, don’t you think others could do the same? Why is it wrong that the one’s on this thread are asking for some respect?
            The truth is, when people lash out with profanity, the do sound ignorant, and it does not matter how educated they are, it shows that they cannot articulate their feelings through respectful speech. Is that really what we as a group want to convey to the opposition?

          • How are you any different? If you don’t like what he said…ignore it! He only doesn’t like the language…you don’t like a whole lot of people! Boo hoo ….

          • You are an asshole…You are an asshole…You are an asshole…You are an asshole…You are an asshole…You are an asshole…You are an asshole…You are an asshole…You are an asshole…You are an asshole…

          • You BlahBlahBlah, appear to be a hater of Patriotism! He, like myself, believe in God and it is not bullshit. You write about him being offened, yet, you became a tyrant!

          • So you don’t believe in the First? Freedom of speech? You are a hypocrite. Despite the colorful language, patriot101 does bring valid points.

          • Where does it say that freedom of speech includes being crude & ignorant? My thought is that using such foul language to express one’s anger is the sign of a small mind. It is NOT hypocritical to be “offended” (the new catch word to cover everything) by such language. If those folks have a “right” to speak such low-class gutter talk, what about the “right” of those of us who don’t want to hear or read it?

          • No, it doesn’t. However, being polite is a virtue. One of many seldom thought about, but truly a virtue. However, since it seems to please you to act like a moron, feel free to continue.

          • Let me play devils advocate here and bring something to light. THIS is exactly the reason why WE as Americans can not sit down to an agreement. We are too busy bickering between each other over the internet. Foul Language, Politeness. How can we stand up as Patriots (PFC Horn B. CO 404 ASB, Ft. Hood, TX 94 Romeo) if you are going to focus on a few foul words? an American is an American no matter what language they use. To the person fighting back, You are also wrong in that you are trying to prove a point by continuing to use foul language against him when BOTH of you are both dead set on who is right. This is the EXACT same thing our politicians are doing in the White House, Congress and Senate. Fighting WITH each other instead of FOR each other. When I made an oath to uphold the constitution and defend the American people there was no stipulation that stated, “Defend only the people that I like, Defend only those that use the language I used or believed my beliefs it was THE AMERICAN people and that meant ANYONE born on United States soil. So to watch people bicker over the internet (ONE OF THE MOST UNIFYING TOOLS WE COULD POSSIBLY HAVE), Its seriously upsetting because if you LOVE your country then you LOVE everyone in it. So do as the puppet masters would have you to do and fight with each other and ignore the men/women in the Congress, Senate and White House that are trying to divide us and when it all goes and your still pointing fingers at each other realize those fingers could have been used to do something more constructive like writing our own bills to overthrow corruption in our capital.

          • Nice to see there is actually someone who gets it!! Americans need to unite and fight for a government that is truly BY and FOR the people as it was designed rather than by and for the special interest groups and lobbyists that in return for votes contribute money to campaign funds.

          • This sounds like a TRUE PATRIOT! I spent 4 years in the military and am proud of it. Mine was during Viet Nam, but I was stateside the whole time. More than likely this man will spend time defending your rights somewhere other than on USA soil. Right on Mitchell.

          • I love you Mitchell Horn. Finally an intelligent individual who gets it. I was seriously starting to wonder if anyone got it anymore. You are absolutely right. Until we can get over the pettiest arguing and debating we shall never be able to unify. We need to stand up TOGETHER as a country and fight TOGETHER. Well said, well said.

          • I was just going to say the same thing… my first thought was: It sure didn’t take long for our focus to be averted… #shakingmydamnhead

          • The government does its most work when good people are at each other. We need to unite and be after the government. We are split today as much as we were during the 60’s and 70’s, to the liking of the government. they do NOT want a strong, united people. A strong, united people are dangerous to tyrants. Obama has done a swell job of creating a divided America.
            The language used isn’t for me to judge. I am educated and a Christian, and I must confess that what is happening in America makes me want to scream bloody murder and become violent. I refrain from the language, most of the time, but the feelings, someday and some way, are going to explode. I am more angry today than at any time in my life for my concern for generations to come, like my 2 beautiful grandsons… Tim

        • It’s obvious. The clear parallels with Obamacare are completely obvious. If you think about it for even a second it’s clear. A “new constitution?” Really? That wouldn’t be the sort of thing that wouldn’t make the news, nor is it even possible. There is no provision for the US to scrap the current constitution and make a new one, only to amend it, and that is a long arduous and very public process.

          Reply
          • Hi JakUnlimited! Thank You for your insight and response! For me, the parallels between this and the other abominations noted were what made it believable and scary. You are right about no provision for scrapping the constitution (by LAWFUL means), but dictators don’t care about doing these things by lawful means. Again, that is what makes this believable and scary to me. Our mainstream media is in bed with the current Administration (dictator wannabe) and while I haven’t noted anything of this magnitude (yet), they love to play the stories that help him and ignore the ones that do not.
            I hope you and the original poster (name unintelligible) are correct that this is simply satire. I for one, do not find it at all beyond the realm of possibility, given our current state of affairs.
            Again, Thank You for your input.

          • Has nothing to do with hate…it’s in the plan it’s called yaqiyya
            Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other, unless the purpose of lying is to “smooth over differences.”
            There are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause Islam – in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.

          • He’s part muslim but takes his orders from the jews. Every word he reads off his teleprompters, which is every word he speaks has been dictated by his jew handlers.

          • I was never confident that Obama was confident; who he was. Is he black? Is he white? Does he hate whites, or blacks, or both? (Have you observed the in your face genocide against blacks?) Does he hate Jews? Does he hate Muslims? (A recent poll, showed the Obama is losing favor in the Muslim community.) Is he straight? Is he gay, or is he both? Is he a Christian one day and a Muslim the other? Does he just hate everyone? Does he hate himself? Was he born in Hawaii, or Kenya?
            A couple of things are certain:
            1. We have a potus, in comparison to other potus’ that we really don’t know Richard about. We have watched him have close ties in the Jewish, Radical Black and Muslim Communities. Let me know if you need me to site examples. We know that he’s a Marxist/Communist and wants us to be like China, or Russia.
            2. The banksters, like Rothchilds, Rockefellers, etc are the puppeteers. They have been pulling the strings on the potus since even prior to 1913 when the Federal Reserve and IRS Bills were passed. Finally, the Rothchilds are considered Jews and therefore Oldcoyote’s statement has merit!

          • His so-called jew puppet masters would not be helping the Muslime Brother-fuckers, and the Libtard Douchebags into taking down a Country that was founded and created by the Original BAD-ASS Mother-Fuckers who stood up to the British Empire to create the epitome of a FREE NATION, Just LIke The Jewish People Did When They Created Israel, Right in the middle of the Beast that we know as MUSLIME-CENTRAL, So old coyote, think with the big head where the brain is supposed to be and not the little one that is activated when you get a hard-on for someone, or SOMETHING !

          • That was a mind numbing read. *smh* When you look closely into the matter who is controlling The World Bank? Who is controlling The Federal Reserve? Why do I feel like I just time warped back into elementary school?

          • Why is it that people like you have to claim that Jews are controlling the prez? No really when did muslims and Jews start getting along? You people always like to say this but never have any proof.

          • If he is following the One World Order plan then there are some Jews behind that. I think his loyalty lies more with the Muslims. How they fit together, or if they even do, is beyond me. He just hates us ’cause he can!

          • Who do you think the puppeteers are then? Do you really think the potus is acting alone? Do you really think this is all Muslim/Al Qaeda? Other than social issues; how is Obama different than Bush? Didn’t Bush claim to be a Christian, however had strong ties to Arabs and Muslims. I’m interested to hear your take? Have you looked well into the matter? I think it’s is simple as this: what ever it takes to get the damn job done! Who/whom will sell out for the least amount of money? Who will fight for our gangster mafia style banksters in the guise of fighting the war on tyranny?

          • Actually, JamUnlimited and CorruptionInColumbia, the Declaration of Independence, our first founding document, establishes the provision for instituting a new constitution–the self-evident authority of a free people, or any unified people for that matter, to: “. . . alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government.” So, in order for there to be a new national Constitution there has to be a new national government instituted by the nation’s sovereign, i.e. We the People, after the sovereign dissolves and disbands the old one. We have that authority. The government exists and functions by our leave and for our purposes alone. Mind you, I”m not recommending we do that. I’m pointing out what so many of us have forgotten or never learned. We the People are the Sovereign of the united States of America, which ARE (not is) a great nation established by charter that We (that is our forebears who bequeathed their sovereignty to us) ratified and which exists by our authorization and no one else’s.
            Problem is, though, We the People are no longer unified by an understanding of this great status we share and that no other national citizenry possesses however democratic or free their societies may be. It’s one thing to enjoy freedom by leave of your government. It’s another thing to be the Sovereign head of a nation who establishes a servant government to protect the Sovereign’s interests. Our minds went abroad generations ago and left a self-empowering bureaucracy in charge that, being intent on protecting itself from the disapproval of a unified people, created, via politics and so-called “social advocacy”, an irreconcilable division cutting through the middle of us as a people. Now We the People are little more than a figurehead sovereignty beaten into submission by political correctness and the stagnating conflict of worldview divisions.

          • The Declaration of Independence is not a founding document, any more than the federalist papers were. It has no legal authority. It was a statement of principles agreed to by those who went on to establish the government we now have, but you can’t cite it to support a legal argument.
            We could, legally, amend the constitution out of existence, but that’s not going to happen.

          • Failure to dispute and oppose IS tacit authorization… the great majority of American Sovereigns are too lazy and/or hypnotized by the TV (un)reality shows and subliminal programming to DO anything! This country is unrecognizable to me now… it’s certainly not America anymore! So sad, so sad.

          • I’m with you, but you do know how they got rid of the articles of confederation, right? It was through it’s amendment process. They just wrote an amendment declaring it null and void. The first step in getting a similar amendment to our current constitution passed would be to have an alternative constitution ready. So it is possible.

          • yeah, because the news totally reports everything… just keep watching faux news and enjoy yourself. the news these days is so fallible it’s silly. how many news stations have reported what’s going on in DC? maybe one or two if any. people in power try to keep power, and information is power.

          • Uhm, Jak, there was no provision in the Articles of Confederation to totally scrap it, only to amend it. The Founders were sent to Philly to amend the Articles and make it stronger, not discard it and replace it with the Constitution.

    • Jackson, J., West Virginia State board of Education v Barnette 319 US 624,638 87 Led 1628, 1638, 63 SCt 1178, 147 ALR 674 (1943) (Robert H Jackson, Supreme Court Justice) The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One’s right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, free press, freedom of worship & assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections, why aren’t americans upholding the constitution, you brought all your problems on yourself.

      Reply
      • They can’t uphold what they don’t understand. Even the so-called “leaders”(supposed to be servants), don’t read legislation and from many of their words, they don’t know the meaning of what they’ve sworn to uphold. I remember being told in school that the Constitution is a living document that is interpreted differently as our society changes. It’s sad really.

        Reply
        • No. It’s more the case that they won’t uphold what they don’t care about. Our supposed leaders don’t know the meaning of the law because they, themselves, have ensured that the law may be interpreted however those in power wish. I believe that may be ‘arbitrary and capricious’. It is at least tyranny. And treason.

          Reply
    • let him go for the Revolution just remember what has happened to all tyrants in the past who’ve tried that before, bye bye king never going to be ovamit we certainly won’t miss you

      Reply
    • After some extensive searching, there is nothing to back this up. It’s a Copy & Past, word for word. At best guess, it was put out there to get the opposition fired up. Most sites that had it posted, removed it. With that said, NEVER underestimate what this Administration will do to reach their end game – Transformation

      Reply
    • Taken From Our Declaration Of Independence
      He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
      DOMA?
      He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to
      our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to
      their Acts of pretended Legislation:
      UN?
      For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
      OBAMACARE?
      For
      taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and
      altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments: CHANGE?
      For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested
      with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
      EXECUTIVE ORDERS?
      In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in
      the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by
      repeated injury. A “Prince” whose character is thus marked by every act
      which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
      Impeachment would seem to be reasonable if there is no real CHANGE in this administration!
      If All Else Fails Remember This On Election Day!

      Reply
  1. Um… Since the CURRENT U.S. Constitution states that any law, passed by Congress as written, which is INCOMPREHENSIBLE TO THE AVERAGE MAN is null and void. Actually, it says “as if it never was.”
    Why aren’t The People shouting THIS from the rooftops? “Impenetrable” is NOT an adjective allowed in any law, EVER. So the ACA is “as if it never was.”
    Bring this up when its time to “pay the fine.”

    Reply
  2. why dont they honor the consitution as it is the supream law of the land ? anew one ha they will change it every time it gets in the way too . ladys and gentilmen its time to hang the traitors that has committed treason to our great republic its the only way to break the pardine we are not a demockrocy we are regestered as a republic and its time to inforce that they work for us we dont work for them get it?

    Reply
  3. Ow, wow!
    i can’t actually comprehend that there are people who don’t know that this is a SATIRE!
    After the stuff that has been happening, it is ALMOST accurate, though…

    Reply
    • Are you kidding? How would that be much different than what’s already been done? No way “satire” is distinguishable from fact with this so-called admin.

      Reply
      • In response, i believe that I stated the obvious fact that that this is a satire, and that it closely parallels reality. I was not kidding when I stated the facts regarding this. Did you see a ‘sarc’ tag from me?
        Seriously, the people asking for ‘links’ are kind of pathetic…

        Reply
  4. Hog-fucking-wash. Lying sack of shit. NO sources, no quotations, no references, nothing.
    Goddmaned mother-fucking asshole. This may be satire, but it’s in POOR TASTE and does NOTHING to educate, inform, enlighten or assist ANYONE.
    Motherfucking ASSHOLE. Stop with the fear-mongering self-promotion BULLSHIT.
    Prick.

    Reply
    • Maybe your comment has some merit, but you lose merit and credibility when you can’t complete sentence without an expletive. I do give you an “A” for entertainment value, however.

      Reply
      • Id say angry and fed up with the BS from both sides but then a few cuss words creating the difference between being credible and ignorant really makes you seem like the ignorant one since some people choose to express anger and frustration in a way in which you do not. Does not make them wrong. Or anything else. Grow up and if you cant deal with a few four letter words Id suggest staying off the internet

        Reply
        • Growing up/being mature is conversing without cuss words, or insults. It turns debates into tantrums, or arguments and makes those fighting for the common good look less credible. The person writing the article wasn’t throwing down insults, or expletives and therefore makes it completely ridiculous.

          Reply
          • Or perhaps you could be mature and overlook the comment he made instead of feeling the need to call him out on what he said…you and the other who replied to him included in that. I have no idea who he is but feel everyone has the right to express themselves in what method they choose. If he chooses those words to express himself that is his choice. It does not however make him stupid, ignornant or any less or more relevant then anyone else in my opinion because I have no idea what caused him to choose those words or if it is how he communicated on a regular basis. I am 37 years old and am perfectly capable of communicating with using a single expletive but that does not mean I never say them. Just like I can guarantee most if not all who have replied to discuss his choice of words have and will use them in the future so all I can say is unless you have never used those words it makes you a HUGE hypocrite.

          • Lol, you really thought long and hard about that reply. The Comment, the person made was inappropriate and offensive banter, period. I’m not being a hypocrite, because I can debate a topic without a curse word every sentence. The freedom of speech wasn’t intended for mindless drivel.

          • it applies to ALL AMERICANS in anyway they choose to use it… how dare you think you are superior and have the right to dictate the Constitution. People like you need exterminated, period.

          • Since you’re my b!tch. How have you liked my nuts on your chin? I have no problem fighting fire with fire, but once again; I don’t need to curse every sentence. I am superior to you! Happy??

          • Someone hiding behind a keyboard, trying to be a man is no substitute for actually being one. I cuss like crazy on the battlefield, but in public forums, I am a gentleman at all times. Man up, clear it up, or get your account ripped. Many people can complain about your posts to get that done.

          • ..”but in public forums, I am a gentleman at all times.” Gentleman at all times, aye. Thank you for fighting for the illusion of protecting my freedoms, however how far do you want to exploit hypocrisy? Has it dawned on you yet, that you are fighting for the bankster/thugs cartel in the guise of fighting the war on terror?
            Sir Price, here are some of your gentleman like posts:
            Joseph Price • 4 days ago
            Maybe that friend should teach the f’king retarded ass Democrats. It’s nice to know that educated people all over the world can call BS when they see it.
            Joseph Price • 4 days ago
            Only 2 words?
            Pound sand.
            Get fisted.
            Eat shit.
            Fuck off.
            Shut up.
            Lots of great ways to tell him to mind his own damn business…since he can’t do his job anyway, maybe he should just STFU.

          • Here’s another classy one:
            Joseph Price • 9 days ago
            Show me the written order that supports your idiotic statement.
            Oh yeah, it doesn’t exist because they CAN’T do something like that. An order to close something like a national monument or park has to come from Obama, you stupid, fucking idiot.
            My guess is; maybe you served low wire Army, however you are no longer deployed. These kind of public statements are not acceptable representation of our armed forces.
            Btw, holding a juggernaut weapon doesn’t make you a man. Standing up, for what is right does. Refusing orders to send shrapnel at innocent men, woman and children, better defines a man.

          • The Constitution wasn’t intended to give you the right to verbally assault others. This proves what a simpleton you are. You sir, are pathetic. I do give you at least brownie points for running to Jessica’s aid. Probably the first time you have ever done so, behind the safety of your PC no doubt. *slow clap*

          • Thank you, I always wanted my own b!tch. Right on!! People like you hide behind your computers. You are pathetic! A sorry excuse for a man/woman. Highly unlikely you would say that to my face, cause yeah, there would be consequences. So who is the moron? Who is weak? Yeah, that’s right; it’s my little b!tch, lol.

          • first of all my husband who is in this picture is not the person who replied after me. But then again it just goes to show who stayed classy without resorting to name calling, cussing or any other thig you condemned the original commenter of doing. As for whether the guy (I assume) who replied after me is taking up for me because I cannot handle a little wanna-be tough guy like you that is a complete joke and I greatly appreciate the humor which gave me a good laugh because I have debated better then you in my time. Also thanks for the judgement once again shows your true colors about how you truly feel. And with that I bid you adieu. Have a nice life with your narrow mindset which you have proven tonight you really are no better then the original poster and I did not have to do anything to make you prove that. You did it all on your own. I have been offline for most of the day because I do have a life and my children and chose to spend Sunday with them instead of trolling the internet. One more suggest for you Nathan Thomas…try growing up and expanding your vocabulary. It is really terrible how IGNORANT you truly sound,

          • Blah, blah, blah, just more trailer park rhetoric. I understand that you can’t handle my repartee, but wow at how much time you have spent typing your circle talk. Adios!!

          • Let me guess, then you created an account so you could let your mouth spew all over the internet and then pretend it’s somebody else. Your mind is weak!

          • That was a mind numbing read. In the future, could you use proper grammar? Your sentence structure and spelling was a bit off. For example, better then?? You were better when? If you are better than I, then you would have been able to use “then” and “than” in proper context. Your run on sentence was more than I could handle. Here’s your run on sentence:
            As for whether the guy (I assume) who replied after me is taking up for me because I cannot handle a little wanna-be tough guy like you that is a complete joke and I greatly appreciate the humor which gave me a good laugh because I have debated better then you in my time.
            Here’s how it should read:
            As for the guy, (I created) who replied after me, is taking up for me, because I cannot handle, a tough guy like you, that is a complete genius. I greatly appreciate the humor, which gave me a good laugh, because I have debated better than you, only in my dreams.
            You actually, really suck at debating. I don’t regret calling you my b!tch! That was AWEsome and funny. Never said, I wouldn’t fight fire with fire, however clearly I have demonstrated my resolve and superiority over you; in this debate.

          • Also just so you know the “pinhead” in my photo is my husband and no he did not reply because he does not need to. I have a mouth which I can use and I can also defend myself without the need of any man coming to my defense. And IF you said what you said directly to my husband I assure you he would feed your nuts to you and make you enjoy it. Because unlike you my husband is a real man A master mechanic and auto body tech which I highly doubt you would have lasted a day or even an hour doing my husbands job. But then again you can always chance what would happen. Id gladly give you my address so you can address my husband directly or are you just a little coward hiding behind a keyboard too?

          • You’re both a couple of welfare crackheads. Your wife, or significant other couldn’t handle the debate so you had to chime in, which proves, you are both hypocrites. Are you saying that if someone was verbally insulting to your wife, you would do nothing? Maybe the question is rhetorical, cause by the looks of you; you would do exactly that..nothing. Cause that’s what little b!tches do. Haha, thanks for the good laughs; priceless.

          • You live in a trailer, smoke cigarettes & crack! You curse like a sailor, because you can’t formulate a sentence due to your poor genetics, double digit IQ and, because you dropped out of high school. You dropped out when you got your girlfriend pregnant and her best friend. You are 5,10′ and weigh 175 lbs. You get winded when you walk out to the parking lot to find your car. You can’t hold a job and your are constantly milking the welfare system. Did I miss any salient points?

          • I might add that if someone is going to go to the trouble of making a point, and then uses offensive (to some, although I would tend to say most) language, the point gets lost in the curse words and the vulgarity. So, why even go there if you want your point or your voice, to actually be heard and counted. Would you (or “ME”) talk to your mother or your grandmother like that?

          • oh and I take it that calling someone ignorant for their choice of words is not an insult or is only ok to insult those who you feel have an inferior intellect than you?

          • Jessica, I have already explained this; “The person writing the article wasn’t throwing down insults, or expletives and therefore makes it completely ridiculous.”

    • Wow! Another paid Obama poster. These stupid paid college kids would never talk like that in person. They cowardly hide behind their keyboards. What a loser. Some day they will be forced to grow up.

      Reply
  5. Will someone please impeach this a**hole? We do noit need a ‘new’ Obama-inspired Constitution. He need to simply support and defend the one we have, as he swore to do when sworn in.

    Reply
  6. Now you see we put these idiots in charge and they think they are geniuses hell they can not even run a country and they damn sure can not balance a check book and now they are trying to get out their crayons and attempt tom rewrite our Constitution,this is a load of BS… stick to what you know or what you think you know , well wait a minute they don not need a minute to figure that out, hell they do not know their ass from a hole in the ground… Leave our constitution alone!!! We do not need a bunch of morons trying to fix something that is not broke , the only thing broke here is our country and we can say thank you to mr Obama and all his little thief’s that work for him in the government for that ,,

    Reply
  7. I wouldn’t doubt the BO is thinking it but as for this goes I am with everyone else links, back up and proof. If the proof is available and has been printed it is treason, so lets see proof.

    Reply
  8. OUTRAGEOUS! The president has no authority to initiate any process for replacing the US Constitution! And to think that only corporate lobbyists and legal think tanks were invited to give input is galling! The US Constitution was drawn up by the original 13 states, ratified by the following 37 states, and is binding contract forming the Union of these United States. The Constitution clearly specifies the processes that must occur to amend or replace the Constitution, and what Obama proposes totally disregards those authorized processes. The man is treasonous & subversive! Let impeachment and prosecution begin swiftly!

    Reply
  9. wasn’t common sense about eating children? You remember any quoted sources
    in that work? excellent piece and well stated. it’s always refreshing when the essence of the issues at hand are distilled to their most unadulterated spirit.

    Reply
  10. YOU don’t Yell FIRE in a Theater and laugh it off as a PARODY…I do not care what your f’n point is…THEREFORE, you do not yell REVOLUTION in a forum of AMERICANS and not expect to take responsibility/accountability for such a blatant slap in the face.
    This article is shameless if it is for commercial benefit, insensitive to the those here who are trying to push the boulder of Liberty up the hill of the sh!t pile we call DC, and just plain dis-respectful to men and woman who are at the ready to take physical action should these false representatives actually try to institute a 2300 page constitution.
    The author better find the creator’s forgiveness and step up really quick, or he and those you are part of this ‘stunt’ may find themselves accountable like others who yell fire in a crowded theater are held to task.

    Reply
    • I second the motion. The Constitution cannot be legally trashed and replaced with a new one by one dictator wannabe, since it was written in a way that the only way to change the Constitution is through the Amendment(s) process; and, as was said before by another poster (with whom I totally agree), this process takes a long time. First, it must be approved by two thirds vote by Congress, followed by ratification by 3/4 of the state legislatures. The ratification process is the most difficult part, however.
      If B.O. thinks he’s going to replace the current Constitution, which has been in effect (counting all amendments) for over 200 years, he’s living in a fantasy world; or, he’s totally evil.

      Reply
  11. can someone please launch world war three where we can all meet our maker this world of Odummies is worse than being taken over by real aliens ….

    Reply
  12. Satire or Truth who knows. However, since BO has already ignored the real Constitution he’s just as likely to ignor the next. Should he find it inconvenient!
    However, I’d bet money that any new Constitution he brings in will include the need for a putting green in His new oval office in the Natiional Mosque … Sorry White House.

    Reply
  13. Tho original is written at a 7th grade reading level and they can’t understand it. So now we need one 2300 pages long that the lawyers can’t interpret to clear up the problems of the original. The only place you can find this kind of stupid is Washington or Hollywood.

    Reply
  14. This is a parody piece (not that I doubt he’s probably working on something like it!) but the article is a parody. Click on the source and look in the address line of the original author.

    Reply
  15. this lunatic in the white house must step down now America, or you wont have a nation left with moral laws and if he does accomplish it, you wish you all were dead., its time for his impeachment ,it cannot be put off any longer, he is a sedionist and a treacherous treasonous piece of African trash.

    Reply
  16. You all do realize he doesnt need to change the constitution. He has already changed everything he needs to in oder to do whatever he need to do to us and he will be a ok. Just check out NDAA signed in December 2011. No Dues Process Rights for American needed in the name of terrorism so he need not bring charges against us and the kicker is that he can assasinate us at will. Why do you think questions are not being asked when that kid was shot 7 times in a FBI interrogation room in the USA held by FBI Agents. Oh and btw he was unarmed…. FYI

    Reply
  17. Why else did he purchase 2,700 MRAPS for domestic use and 1.6 Billion rounds that would sustain a hot war for 20 years, not to mention the pregnant women NO-Hesitation/children targets our American Domestic Enforcers are practicing on like DHS. Hmmmm Wake up People!!!!

    Reply
  18. We all seem to see the little picture, myself included. It is how most have been taught, over the past 50 years or so, to see the world around us. My friends, whether this article is true or false is not the real story. The real story is we, as a civilization founded on principals such life, liberty, and perhaps even happiness, have allowed this great and blessed nation to deteriorate to such a level that this article would even need to be written. Yes, one and all, we have failed at our constitutional duty to maintain our founding principals. “We the People, in order to form a more perfect union…”, has stood as a clarion call to all citizens of this nation since those words were first written. How many teenagers can even utter those few words today? How many so-called “adults” can tell us where those words may be found? It is time for the people of this Republic relearn these words and then view the bigger picture. There is nothing cryptic to this, just a simple understanding of the few words this nation was founded on. If we cannot even remember those few words then perhaps we, as a people, deserve the full wrath of those we allow to control this society. I know in my heart that isn’t the case just yet. Nonetheless, to prevent this grand experiment from its demise, we the people, must stand together now and throw off the burden of tyranny and slavery placed around the necks of every citizen. Regardless of race, religion and all of the great things this socialism has rewarded us with, we ALL MUST STAND NOW!!

    Reply
  19. This wouldn’t be up for a vote by congress or lobbyist. as it is WE THE PEOPLE who decide how to be governed not those who repeatedly pervert justice.
    Americans should also understand that we as a nation are hated not for any alleged freedoms, but because this government has since the Korean war murdered over 10,000,000 either directly or through its proxy dictators installed in nations decimated by US military .
    Just as looking at WWII photos of Germany where US destroyed all infrastructures causing mass starvation. Add Japan with dropping atomic bombs then flying 1000 additional Sorties burning 16 square miles of Tokyos civilians to a horrible death. The US backed genocide in Guatemala’ and E. Timor as well as the Oliver North covert ears like in Syria and Libya where the US always seems to back Freedom Fighters that murder tens of thousands and then lies to the Americans about it.

    Reply
  20. OBAMA will force this through without a vote like he has been doing for the last few years,like Obamacare we didn’t get to vote Just him. This is the LIVING CONSTITUTION Nancy Pilosi wanted written to replace the original one. This new Constitution voids the older one.

    Reply
  21. A Constitution with redacted pages? It’s not for the people to understand or know? What you people out there in La La Land must understand, is the use of the term “National Security”, has nothing to do with protecting the people, as evidenced by the false flag events perpetrated against us. “National Security” has only to do with a government run amok, who wants to maintain its position over the people it is supposed to serve. As a nation, we have no real enemies, except in nations where we have muddle up their political processes for the sole benefit of our national Corporatism as it tries to raid the physical and economic resources of those other countries.
    Also, when a document tries to cover all bases by construing the language to corral any act of free will, such that it needs over two thousands pages to describe what is needed, it is bogus by any account.
    No amount of convoluted language can strip free will from the people’s understanding that it is simply stated in our “Declaration of Independence”: “We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.” It goes without saying, that it is also without any intervention or interference by government in the pursuit of those unalienable rights.
    Our government has made it abundantly clear that it is about protecting itself at all cost, even if it means the cost of American lives on American soil ! We cannot change or stop this criminal cabal by votes as it is too ingrained in American life. Yes sir, we are all culpable. We must ask the military move to stop them in their tracks before our government uses more false flag events to sway public opinion to allow itself to be governed by a Police State and the NAZI mentality that will be used against the people to supposedly maintain order.
    The very sick part of this is that no one seemingly understands, once you go down that road, the eventuality is that soon or later everyone will become suspect as our government sinks into raving paranoia of a Schizophrenic. This have been proven time and again throughout history for a millennia !!!

    Reply
  22. Satire or no, if this administration thought they could redraft the Constitution they wouldn’t waste a second! For all we know there is already a replacement drafted and waiting in the wings, just like the Patriot Act.

    Reply
  23. Apparently no one noticed the actual URL for this article where it was originally published, as shown when you mouseover the name of the author:
    http://www.oftwominds. com/blogoct13/constitution-parody10-13.html
    This is the problem with just re-posting articles without checking into the author or any vetting whatsoever…

    Reply
  24. Not no, but hell no! What’s wrong with the document we have now? Is it putting too many roadblocks in your way to a larger regressive socialist nightmare? The time for war is almost upon us, so my word to the socialists is this: surrender !

    Reply
  25. This has to be a joke. Anytime someone shows up with a “solution” that involves putting more words to the plain and straight forward, they really intend to obfuscate and corrupt. An example would be the War Powers resolution that took the clear intent of the Legislature alone taking the country from a state of peace to war to a despot with a private mercenary force at his disposal and a plethora of supposed loopholes to dance through. My suggestion would be for members of Congress to vote no on any legislation that’s longer than the very contract, Constitution, that establishes the whole of the Federal government. Too many lawyers playing word games with a public that has been mind-molded to accept sound bytes and directions rather than think critically, as it is.

    Reply
  26. This has to be some sort of gag. Obama would be better served by declaring martial law. No one would ever trust that scumbag with a ‘new Constitution’… give me a break… LMAO!

    Reply
  27. The new Constitution will read “I will NOT NEGOTIATE! It is MY WAY or the Highway!” And of course, there will be a small snippet stating “Barack Obama shall remain the POTUS. For Life”.

    Reply
  28. Our US Constitution was forged by the most brilliant minds in AMERICAN HISTORY!
    Those great men were totally into protecting an individual’s rights and freedoms.
    America has grown to be a great country because of our Constitution of Laws.
    The problems we are experiencing now are because of the willful and wonton acts of treason against our Constitution by the very people that swore to uphold and protect it! Now, these same traitors want to rewrite it? Only a fool would try to rewrite it and only bigger fools would support such a treasonous act!
    The Obama Administration hasn’t got the experience or combined intelligence to create a “New” Constitution that protects the INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN. They want to BETTER protect the Corporations, Bankers, Israel, Wars, Spying, The Police State, etc. LOOK at the Healthcare Bill, NDAA, Banking Bills….nothing to protect the average citizen. Everything was written by corporations, special interest groups, or treasonous government agencies and in each bill it has been proven to give the Federal Government MORE power and control and the individual citizens LESS Rights, Freedom & Liberty!
    The States would NEVER ratify such a “toilet paper inspired” document. States Rights have always been “supreme” in the present Constitution and those Rights trump the Federal Government’s….THAT is what the present US Constitution says and they don’t like that…tough shit isn’t it?
    Funny joke….in poor taste but, really funny to think this bunch of hacks could see themselves on the same level as Jefferson, Adams, or George Washington! Only in their wet dreams!

    Reply
  29. THERE ARE NO GRAY AREAS IT IS WRITTEN AS MEANT TO BE. THE ONLY SCREW UP IS THAT OUR FOUNDING FATHERS ASSUMED THAT THE PRESIDENT’S PARENTS WOULD BE AMERICAN BORN AND CHILD AMERICAN BORN CITIZEN IN ORDER TO BE PRESIDENT.

    Reply
  30. Might this 2, 300 page be but a draft of the same one that was supposedly being written by Samantha Powers, her husband and others while she was sitting on a certain UN policy panel under George Soros a year or two earlier? If it be, then we know why she was appointed to be Ambassador to the UN and why she previously stated at the UN that Americans would have to give up a few more Rights.I would suggest, that if someone needs the Original Contitution interpreted then perhaps they are in need of learning the English language. The North American Union sheeple united under one enslavement manual, how lovely.

    Reply
  31. This may be a joke , but you know how science fiction becomes science fact. Obama has stated many times that the Constitution is in his way. That’s what makes a story like this believable. If Obama and his Marxist thugs think for five minutes that rewriting the Constitution or creating an over riding Amendment is possible they will not hesitate to attempt it. Obama is running out of time and he has not completed his mission of total destruction of the American economy or setting himself up as dictator. He will begin to implement more desperate measures to take us down as each month passes. Obamacare was his key to the destruction but he has run into a roadblock he did not anticipate.

    Reply
  32. Any links to it for reading? Any further information? What is the name of the White House administration member who said this?
    This could be a hoax, but the concept of him doing this is of no surprise considering he absolutely hates our freedom.

    Reply
  33. The Bible has 2,000 pages in it depending on whether you use a Catholic or a Protestant Bible. Yet people have been arguing over it for nearly a couple of millennial. The more text the more there is to dispute. Either Obama is an idiot or he believes us to be idiots.

    Reply
  34. Guys stop the fighting here, it is true that they are trying to create a one world government which will need a one world constitution. Well who has always been at the forefront of this one world government or new world order shit guys; it is printed right on the dollar bill, been in your faces for a long, long time so yes they would have to have a new constitution which guess who will write??? The fake peace prize winner. Wake UP. I mean common here guys you all know it is true so why doubt the author of this article.

    Reply
  35. There’s nothing wrong with the constitution that we have now. I don’t need anything that obozo has had his hands in. That just spells trouble for all involved. This will cause very bad things to happen in this country.

    Reply
  36. ARE YOU KIDDING ME 1st of all the ONLY way to legally “amend” the constitution which takes a constitutional conference in which 75% 2/3rds must agree … the only reason Obama wants to change it is because he is not an absolute ruler this is really bad news .. if this happens there will be an uprising and a 2nd civil war

    Reply
    • The Blacks and Hispanics are pawns to the Progressives. How have they benefited under this administration?
      Progressive Movement is all about control of the people by anyway necessary. Lofty ideas with no substance except economic slavery.

      Reply
  37. Any law that cannot be read and understood by the governed is useless. The notion of ‘gray’ areas is one caused by a lack of understanding of the law (its intent) or by construction of argument to circumvent it. Clearly, the president understands the constitution and various ways to circumvent it. I am suspicious that the 2300 pages of ‘proposed constitutional changes’ that cannot be read and understood by most highly educated people is filled with usurpation of people’s liberty. It should be viewed with some skepticism.
    Our founding fathers reminded us that matters of great importance should not be decided on slim majorities. Throwing out our constitution that an eighth grader can read and understand for a monstrous work that assuredly neither increases personal liberty nor increases government restraint from tyrannical behavior is a giant step toward despotism.
    It seems that the Presidents men are calling for a New Constitution. This could be construed to be an act to overthrow our constitution, rather than defend it. When the words and actions of a man are frequently at odds, then we ought trust our eyes more than our ears. Treason is a high crime.

    Reply
  38. The. Civil War Starts When?
    I swore to support and defend the Cobstution of the United States of America. Not a 2300 page lie drempt up by a wannabe dictator

    Reply
  39. It all about Obama’s desire (and all Leftists) to have nothing that limits their power as elected officials – what he calls “positive rights.” The present Constitution limits govt and tells them what they can’t do to the citizenry. These radicals want a “Constitution” that tells the citizenry what govt can do to them and places the limits on the individuals liberty and freedom. That’s what this Transformation of America is all about.

    Reply
  40. I think this is fake, but with the Dempcrap party leading the way it probably isn’t. Yep, this would start a war, but when have the left ever longed for anything else. They want a war to get rid of those who don’t vote correctly so they can live happily ever after.

    Reply
  41. ok, so i scrolled down through the comments and, somehow, a discussion about the article above became a petty argument between 2 people who clearly are both in the wrong to some degree but neither of them will admit even a small amount of blame. how did that happen? as for the obscenities, i agree that it does appear more credible if you don’t use them every other word, but how credible a person appears is entirely up to them and is extremely subjective; there are people who have hearts of gold who will shout a string of curse words that would make a truck driver blush and there are people who are complete jerks who can speak like kings and queens; it means nothing about their knowledge or their humanity; as to the article, which is where this discussion should be, i certainly hope that its a parody because if it isn’t, then Obama is looking for a fight…..

    Reply
    • “i agree that it does appear more credible if you don’t use them every other word, but how credible a person appears is entirely up to them and is extremely subjective;”
      “but how credible a person appears is entirely up to them and is extremely subjective;”
      Are you serious? Being credible is entirely up to Joe Blow and extremely subjective? I’m pretty sure there’s a “standard” in civilized culture to being credible. For example, most (probably 95%) of the readers on this thread question the credibility of the article. So could you, please explain your statement of “extremely subjective”?

      Reply
  42. Don’t kill The living; the change is not freedom! United States is not ready to be a slave to government; but a Government of the people, for the people, and by the people. Protected by a living document The United States Constitution

    Reply
    • I don’t like that “living document” stuff. It is used by historical revisionists to tell us that we can interpret the Constitution any way we please to make it say just about anything at all. The Constitution should be interpreted the way the constructionists from the Supreme Court have done for 200 years. Otherwise, it is meaningless and no defense at all of our individual rights.

      Reply
    • With this administration, reality and the surreal are blurred beyong recognition. Look at the reality of Obama’s many presidential edicts done without any input from Congress and tell me what is satire.

      Reply
  43. “ACA is the law now and has been for 3 years, so leave it alone.”
    Obama and his Democrat thugs have been saying that….ok.
    The Constitution has been the law for over 200 years. LEAVE IT ALONE!!!
    If Obama wants a war, he’s going to find out rather quickly that he will be on the losing end. 27 million veterans are heavily armed, another 23 million fairly armed, another 8 million unarmed, but will join the fight, 80% of the US military, and a lot more uncounted souls ready to join.
    He has at most 400,000 UN/world troops to help him, a few criminals, thugs, and an unarmed population of freaks.
    Tactically, he has no chance. BRING IT ON!!!

    Reply
  44. This new constitution could be implemented as part of a CON-CON, a constitutional convention. There are many states that are open for a CON-CON and it would take only 34 states to start one. During a CON-CON the old constitution could be voted down and the new piece of crap constitution could be inserted/replaced. This is why a CON-CON is so dangerous and why we must watch all the weasels in government, especially the state government.

    Reply
    • I would like to know what they do with the Bill of Rights in this scam they are proposing. I don’t think I need assume our rights will be protected.

      Reply
      • This is entirely up to the con-con. If they throw out the old constitution, the bill of rights is tossed with it. This is why I and any sane person rejects it. Too many ways to create a tyrannical constitution and make us all slaves. If you know that your state senators or representatives support a CON-CON they are probably a progressive and want to overturn our constitution and way of life. Any talk or move for a CON-CON must be stopped at any cost.

        Reply
  45. This doesn’t come as a surprise. Obama want to rewrite the Constitution to say what the government IS allowed to do, as opposed to how it was written by our founding fathers, specifically to tell the government what it cannot do. Obama and his cronies have pushed to destroy America for years, and this is just the icing on the cake. If Obama pursues this, it just may be enough to finally incite the people in America who still have any independent thoughts, and do not want the government controlling their lives and supporting them, to take action. I fear for my children and grandchildren. The America I have known all my life no longer exists.

    Reply
  46. Our current Constitution is what every American President, Vice President, Cabinet member, white house employee, Our Military, Police and fire, and current Government employee, Teachers, Police Officers, Justices, Judges and civic Worker has VOWED TO UPHOLD. If the constitution is changed, Do we re-swear in EVERYBODY to the new one? THIS IS MADNESS AND ILLEGAL AND WRONG. Cannot be true.

    Reply
  47. Simply unthinkable and SO very dangerous!! An alarm needs to be sound loud and clear for ALL AMERICAN citizens!! And action needs to be taken whether it is via impeachment, legislation, or by the taking up of arms against Mr Obama and his administration. I fear it may too late. He has a private army…the Dept of Homeland Security.

    Reply
  48. Too open to interpret? It’s very clear to me what the responsibilities of govt are. They are enumerated for the honest and literate. Only the criminal would want to inflict anything else on the people.

    Reply
  49. We don’t need a “new” Constitution, we need to restore the one we have!! It’s a divinely inspired document–read the Founders on this, they knew it was; we need to peel back all the crap and restore what we’ve lost. A HUGE hurdle, but a vital piece, is to repeal the 16th and 17th Amendments. Put the Senate back in their proper constitutional role and take back their power to tax at will.

    Reply
  50. All it will provide is more license for the crooks in Washington to steal from the people and buy the votes by allowing open immigration, undermining the security of the country. This bunch of jackals needs to be thrown out on their collective asses!

    Reply
  51. The Constitution in its present form is sufficient to keep the Presidents from doing whatever they want. The only reason they would want to change it; is to give him more control. Don’t even try it.

    Reply
  52. All i can say or even think at this moment is wow. I knew there was something coming but this takes the cake. I don’t know why I am sitting here wondering why, when really I Should have been wondering when, and now we all know.

    Reply
  53. The biblical ‘Writing on the wall’ (Daniel 1:1-5) wasn’t nearly that long, but will have much more far reaching consequences during The Tribulation, 3 1/2 years of hell on earth. Believe it or not!

    Reply
  54. Welcome to America with Sharia law courtesy of the New World Order. Maybe the new health care will let you pick your own death camp. It is so sad what this wonderful Nation has become.

    Reply
  55. They tried to rewrite Shakespeare, it didn’t work, they tried to sell us “new” coke, didn’t work, they tried to replace Charlie Sheen with that tall goofy looking kid, didn’t work, they gave us wings, we still love the Beatles, Butter will always be better than I can’t believe its not butter, just because obama says he is God does not make it so, I’m sticking with orginial thank you very much!

    Reply
  56. i would like to think this is a bad joke, but there is no way in hell this could pass, if it’s true. slowbama will be gone, but the other slugs want to leep their jobs.

    Reply
  57. I’d like the writer to offer some proof of this. This idiot is just ruffling feathers and lots of fools below me are falling for it! Soo…Mr. Author, where is this new Constitution you speak of? I’m calling your lying @ss out?

    Reply
  58. It’s funny………after over 200 years and 44 presidents this one is the one person who has the power to wreck a country…to ruin a living document that has been governing this country since it began. Some how in his infinite wisdom he has discovered that this document is flawed and that does not work for the rest of us……..things like free speech, the right to bare arms, freedom of religion. do they really need to be spelled out in 2300 pages..I am sure Mr. President that we do not need you……and we sure do not need you messing up this one nation under GOD any more then you already have. also a fair warning….ripple effects can be tremendous.

    Reply
  59. CURRENT COMMUNIST GOALS
    1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
    2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
    3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
    4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
    5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
    6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
    7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
    8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev’s promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
    9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
    10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
    11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
    12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
    13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
    14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
    15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
    16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
    17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
    18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
    19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
    20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.
    21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
    22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”
    23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”
    24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
    25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
    26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
    27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”
    28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”
    29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
    30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”
    31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
    32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
    33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
    34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
    35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
    36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
    37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
    38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].
    39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
    40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
    41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
    42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use [“]united force[“] to solve economic, political or social problems.
    43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
    44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
    45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

    Reply
  60. If the average citizen will be unable to understand the “new” constitution, how does it provide clarity at the same time? If Obama attempts this this country will be drenched in blood, and God only knows how it will end.

    Reply
  61. Did any of you see the interview with Ben Smith x-Navy Seal who is warning us same thing take the blinders off people, Yeš it is scary but…….IF THIS IS TRUE ABOUR “RAND PAUL”Don’t worry Kentucky people will take care of him.OMG THIS IS UGLY.

    Reply
  62. No one has been so stupid as to try and rewrite our nation’s constitution. If in fact this IS real he will have a fight on his hands. Those of us who love and defend our country will fight for it. I will NOT let my country be destroyed without a fight. When is American going to wake up and see that this guy is a snake in our midst. He is single-handedly trying to destroy this country and no one seems to get it. IMPEACH him!!!!!!

    Reply
  63. . But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever. – John Adams The Constitution is not an instrument for the gov’t to restrain the people. It is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-lest it come to dominate our lives and interests. – Patrick Henry

    Reply
  64. Well people, we can argue all day about what can and can’t be done but we have already seen proof that if Obama wants something changed, he just changes it. He has enough liberal commies surrounding him and fellow Muslim Brotherhood members in place to take care of anyone who would try to stop him. We have seen how fast the Rinos cave when they come up against him. He is very good at causing discord and is the reason that race relations in this country have been set back 50 years. He has pitted blacks against whites, republicans against democrats, and has us talking to each other like we are enemies. Obama is trying to provoke Americans into revolt so he can declare Martial Law. He is planning to fire on, imprison, and exterminate those Americans who don’t agree with him or his policies. This man is the most dangerous man in America and maybe the world. He is a foreign born Muslim with no love for America or Americans. Anyone who is fooled into believing that he is harmless is blind. He has allowed his terrorist Muslim Brotherhood into this country and even put them in government positions. He is quietly firing military leaders who refuse to say they will fire on Americans and he has foreign soldiers on our soil! (Why would we need foreign soldiers if not to keep AMERICANS in line?) Whoever thinks he is just inept is not paying attention. We as Americans have allowed our freedoms to be compromised one by one by being apathetic, lazy, or asleep. If God doesn’t have mercy on us, we are a lost nation.

    Reply
  65. only an insecure foreigner in power, and being led by satanic influences would want to override a Christian Based constitution, so as to advance an evil agenda to dismantle the last stronghold between the evil onslaught and Gods chosen people. and if this is not posted, I’ll know without a shadow of a doubt, I’m correct, and My Freedom of speech is being stifled by the government..

    Reply
  66. Does anyone understand tongue-in-cheek writing when they read it? God help us if Johnathan Swift were alive and writing today, some people might start a war because they don’t understand simple language arts.

    Reply
  67. I hope this is false, there will be no way he could get it passed. We can’t have a document that has “secret” laws…. he’d have to do a lot more stuff … like complete gun removal, and then he’d have to get the military to enforce this….. this would in fact cause a second War of Independence, this time from tyranny within

    Reply
    • “If in the opinion of the People, the distribution or modification of the Constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.”
      United States, 19th September 1796
      His Excellency: the Most Honorable GEORGE WASHINGTON

      Reply
  68. First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out–
    Because I was not a Socialist.
    Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out–
    Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out–
    Because I was not a Jew.
    Then they came for me–and there was no one left to speak for me.
    Martin Niemöller
    Martin Niemöller was one of the earliest Germans to talk publicly about
    broader complicity in the Holocaust and guilt for what had happened to
    the Jews. In his book Über die deutsche Schuld, Not und Hoffnung
    (published in English as Of Guilt and Hope)–which appeared in January
    1946–Niemöller wrote: “Thus, whenever I chance to meet a Jew known to
    me before, then, as a Christian, I cannot but tell him: ‘Dear Friend, I
    stand in front of you, but we can not get together, for there is guilt
    between us. I have sinned and my people has sinned against thy people
    and against thyself.'”

    Reply
  69. Yea, I don’t know how true this is. But, if it is, this will start one heck of a storm that this administration will not be able to weather. Too many have fought and died for the original, and the founding fathers left it open to interpretation on purpose. They left it open, so it could be adaptive throughout the generations. They limited government and left the power within the states to decide their own destiny. I’m fairly certain this new legislation would remove the states rights as it outlines what the federal government can do instead of what it cannot.

    Reply
  70. If they would follow our Constitution and with the federalist papers giving the spirit in which the founding fathers wrote the Constitution. As usual the Gooberment has taken something easy and is making it harder so they can put the screws to us common folk.

    Reply
  71. billy Graham is doing a {Pray for America] broadcast on November7th-all churches in our area have planning prayer night.that night. Prayer may not change it or prayer may give Americans the backbone they need to stand up to the Musulin in the white House

    Reply
  72. So where is this ‘NEW CONSTITUTION’. I want to attempt to read it. 2300 pages? But they say the ‘old’ constitution is too hard to interpret? And there are 200 secret pages??? Um… ya… No thanks!

    Reply
  73. Wow, I can’t believe how susceptible you people are to anything you read online without sources, facts, or otherwise. And how blind just about all of you are to SATIRE. Like, really. I am almost sure that the writer of this did it purposely to give all you “patriots” an aneurysm just for laughs. Admittedly, the comments I’ve read here today would be much funnier if it weren’t so disturbing that you all were so quick and gullible to believe it.

    Reply
    • Until a story of this nature appears in a number of venues no judgement can be arrived at. The only interest it carries is that it is plausible. Politically it can come from the ‘Left’ or ‘Right’, no way to tell at this point.
      You could be right in that this is but someone having a laugh at others expense. However, it could also be the opening shot of a propaganda ploy.
      If you have an interest in this watch for other stories, paying particular attention to the source. The magic number is “6”. Six venues and six different authors. If so, there is a game in play.

      Reply
  74. I AGREE DEAN. WHEN ARE WE GOING TO GET OFF OUR BUTTS AND TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK…….WE DON’T NEED A NEW CONSTITUTION…..THAT MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE IS DESTROYING THIS COUNTRY…….WHEN IS THE REVOLUTION GOING TO START PEOPLE…….ZOMBIES….GET OFF YOUR ASSES….OR, YOU WILL BE FACING THE EAST ON YOUR KNEEDS 5 TIMES A DAY.

    Reply
  75. I’ve done a bit of research, and this appears to me to be just one of those famous urban legends that someone created on a liberal blog to make fun of the propensity of Congress to create large, incomprehensible bills lately. Even if created in Jest, it so closely aligns with the philosophy of the current administration, and the history of what Obama has already stated, that this legend ‘has legs’.

    Reply
  76. If they are to be any changes to made to our constitution, I feel the people should have something to say about that. I really don’t thing the constitution should be tampered with. Leave it alone!!

    Reply
  77. Nothing like having a bunch of insane people running other insane people under laws that make no sense whatsoever. Read the article again and again. Pure nonsense. And of course, the people have a say in this constitution?? Not likely, they never had a say in the first constitution, which is a joke and mentions nothing about securing ones private property rights.

    Reply
  78. This is only a spoof.
    But like any legend, there must be some element of believability or the initial story could never get off the ground and probably wouldn’t even be thought of. The government and its cronies would love for the people to have NO power. That much IS true. So this is a spoof FOR NOW.

    Reply
  79. The only time you can possibly see any gray in the Constitution of the United States of America is when you forget its intent which was to protect the citizens of a brand new nation form the tyranny of an oppressive government. The problem is that the changes over many decades have been small so that they are hardly noticeable. Could you imagine the Founding Fathers of this country coming back and seeing how our nation has declined in to this welfare entitlement state? They would be appalled!!

    Reply
  80. This has been confirmed by Snopes to be a flagrant lie and the right-wing propaganda group who originally posted this… Family Security Matters… has now removed their post. You should really check your facts instead of spreading more lies.
    Thanks for being part of the problem.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Dean Moore Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.