Obama's Action Toward Russia Is An Embarrassment To Civilized People, And I Believe His Motive Is Questionable.

by Pamela Williams
I want to begin this report by apologizing for the uprooting of 35 Russian families from their Long Island and Maryland homes. It is the beginning of a New Year, and these families were given 72 hours to pack and leave. These are families…yes, they are Russian diplomats…yes, they have homes in Russia…yes, Putin sent a plane to fly them home…yes, to all these things. They, also, can hold their heads up as they leave, while Americans should hang their heads in disgrace for ever putting someone like Obama in the White House!
There are so many things wrong with what Obama is doing to this Country. I want to start with the report just put out by the FBI and the DHS concerning the alleged “Russian hacking” into the DNC. If the DNC had not betrayed one of their own, the “leaks” …yes, “leaks”, because that is what they are…not “hacks”…the Democrats would not be disintegrating into smoke as we speak. They are turning on each other over the billion dollars wasted on Hillary Clinton. I, also, believe what Julian Assange calls the “leaks’ …an “inside job”. There are two deceased men who were involved with the DNC, and we will probably never know the truth of what really happened to those men. I will leave it at that. End of commentary.
The report header begins with a disclaimer:

www.informationliberation.com/?id=56048
Further Commentary: The report does not actually give factual “evidence” to prove Russia did, in fact, hack the DNC…again Judge Andrew Napolitano has stressed in several videos it was not a “hack” but a “leak”. I trust Napolitano over Obama any day. Oh, what about the fact that Congress has not even been briefed on this report, and what happened to the CIA? John Brennan and Obama cooked the report up, or the CIA was the first agency to leak to the media concerning the report. Nothing adds up. End of commentary.
“The DHS statement is a restatement of already known public information, a series of technical indicators that are intended for use by cybersecurity professionals in finding and remediating APT28 malware on private sector networks, and some generic advice for companies as to how to improve their network security,” said Matt Tait, founder of the U.K.-based security consultancy Capital Alpha Security.
?

FROM WIKILEAKS:  Today’s Obama “hacking report” has a disclaimer. It also doesn’t mention .
Russia actually shares America’s interests more than any other nation on the planet. Russia is a Christian nation which rejects multiculturalism and refuses to let the Soros’s of the world subvert their national interests. That’s the only reason they’re so hated by our cosmopolitan elite.

 

The F.B.I. and the Department of Homeland Security on Thursday also released samples of malware and other indicators of Russian cyberactivity, including network addresses of computers commonly used by the Russians to start attacks. But the evidence in a report, in which the administration referred to the Russian cyberactivity as Grizzly Steppe, fell short of anything that would directly tie senior officers of the G.R.U. or the F.S.B., the other intelligence service, to a plan to influence the election.

www.nytimes.com/2016/12/29/us/politics/russia-election-hacking-sanctions.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1
Further commentary: Does Obama care that diplomatic relations with Russia are so damaged that it will be difficult for any one to repair them? President Putin is behaving in a very diplomatic manner truly using his full brain capacity, but Obama seems to be lacking in a brain. But wait, could it be that Obama’s brain is totally consumed with a hidden agenda? What about his dismal failure in Syria? You know, the failure to overthrow Assad and to create another opportunity for ISIS to expand its Caliphate? He failed at his “moderate Syrian rebel” project. In fact, is has been reported that a ceasefire between the rebels and Syrian government forces is occurring as we speak. End of commentary.
 
 

The Syrian government and rebel groups have agreed a nationwide ceasefire from midnight (22:00 GMT) on Thursday.
The deal was announced by Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and confirmed by Turkey. The two nations, which back opposing sides, will act as guarantors.
The High Negotiations Committee (HNC), regarded by the UN as Syria’s main opposition body, confirmed the deal, which excludes jihadist groups.
If the truce holds, peace talks will be held in Kazakhstan within a month.
At least 300,000 people are believed to have been killed in fighting that followed the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad in March 2011.

A further four million have fled the country to seek refuge in neighbouring states or Europe.

www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-38460127
Further commentary:  This is good news for humanity, but is it good news for Obama?  Think about it.   Obama can’t be seen as punishing Russia for driving terrorists from Aleppo. Would Obama be guilty of “giving aid and comfort to the enemy”…isn’t there a law on the books about that? End of commentary.
This is a comment made by Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan:. He made it quite clear yesterday that the sanctions and expulsions had nothing to do with hacking and everything to do with Russia interfering with our “national interests” abroad. “Russia does not share America’s interests. In fact, it has consistently sought to undermine them, sowing dangerous instability around the world. While today’s action by the administration is overdue, it is an appropriate way to end eight years of failed policy with Russia”
In Syria, Russia helped stop our regime change operation that intended to bring along with it the Qatar-Turkey pipeline and the creation of the western quarter of Greater Kurdistan.  In Ukraine our regime change operation took place immediately after the Ukrainian people decided they wanted no part of the European Union and the new IMF loans that came along with the deal.  And in regards to the BRICS nations… well, that speaks for itself. And there are the interests of our neoliberal and Likudnik friends in London and Tel Aviv to think about as well.  These are the “national interests” Paul Ryan and President Obama speak of. They wont specify what they are because Americans are not likely to want to charge into global war over oil and banking hegemony since it’s their loved ones who will be fighting it, not Ryan’s or Obama’s. QUOTED FROM:
willyloman.wordpress.com/2016/12/30/obamas-russian-sanctions-have-nothing-to-do-with-hacking-its-about-syria-not-the-fbis-grizzly-lie-report/
In conclusion, I want to remind you of the following which I believe to be true:
 
In conclusion, I want to remind you of the following which I believe to be true:  LINK:  theduran.com/judge-jeanine-exposes-barack-obamas-petty-attempt-to-derail-trumps-presidency-by-lying-about-russian-election-hacking/
Former British ambassador Craig Murray confirms DNC and Podesta leaks were the work of a Washington insider; and says he knows identity and has met with this person. FBI meanwhile casts doubt on CIA claim DNC and Podesta leaks were the work of Russia. (REMEMBER WHEN THE FBI WOULD NOT ADD ITS NAME TO THE CIA REPORT?)

Anyone wanting to know more of what Craig Murray is saying should read his statement on his blog.  Indeed it should be mandatory reading for anyone interested in the truth of this affair.

We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!

On the subject of his personal knowledge and reputation for truthfulness and credibility Craig Murray has this to say

“Now both Julian Assange and I have stated definitively the leak does not come from Russia. Do we credibly have access? Yes, very obviously. Very, very few people can be said to definitely have access to the source of the leak. The people saying it is not Russia are those who do have access. After access, you consider truthfulness. Do Julian Assange and I have a reputation for truthfulness? Well in 10 years not one of the tens of thousands of documents WikiLeaks has released has had its authenticity successfully challenged. As for me, I have a reputation for inconvenient truth telling.”

To which I would merely add what I said about Craig Murray on 31st October 2016

“I have previously put on record my own strong doubts that Russia is behind the DNC and Podesta leaks.  Now Craig Murray – a former British ambassador who (unlike me) is a personal friend of Julian Assange – has come forward to say that he knows 100% as fact that Russia is not behind the leaks.

Craig Murray is a man of proven integrity who as a former senior diplomat has handled classified intelligence material and who therefore knows how to separate fact from fiction.  If he says he knows 100% for sure that Russia is not responsible for the DNC and Podesta leaks, then given the sources he has that is good enough for me, as it should be for all reasonable people. 

FROM VIDEO:

Published on Dec 11, 2016

Why choose to investigate Russian hackers now?

 

Views:

18 thoughts on “Obama's Action Toward Russia Is An Embarrassment To Civilized People, And I Believe His Motive Is Questionable.”

  1. There is no doubt in my mind another, hidden agenda is at work with Obama’s foolish, puerile actions against Russia. My guess is Mr. 0bama will not leave the White House come January 20. Some false flag will be acted out for the world to witness as an excuse for Barry Soetoro or Barack 0bama or whatever his name is to declare a National Emergency and make himself Dictator of America. His lies about Russia are supposed to prepare the world to accept the idea that Russia is responsible for whatever disaster America has planned to entertain all of us with.

    Reply
    • Tom, I do not believe in slave mentality. Each of us are responsible for our own actions. Each of us is a sovereign entity under God. If we consider ourselves to be slaves, then we do not believe in God. No one can make another do anything. They may kill you, but in the end you are going die anyway. If you maintain courage, you die a free man.

      Reply
      • Lets prove your mentality and ask your government to start recruiting soldier for these current wars and promise them no benefit. Will see how many soldier will actually go to Army Marine etc etc let alone “fighting for freedom” halfway around the world.
        Dear, there is no freedom In the land freeks home of the slave.

        Reply
        • Tom, I live in this world, but I am not of this world. One has to be free first of all in one’s own mind. If one is loyal to God, then one can get through their earthly walk a free entity. However, and I repeat, if a man does not have courage above all else, yes, he is a slave and a coward. Christ showed us what it takes to survive this world. Judas showed us what a “slave” really is. What is the difference in what they showed us? Christ put His faith in God, even though God asked Him to die in this world…He died a free man, even while hanging on the cross. Judas was a coward with no faith in God nor himself, and he died a “slave”. That is truly how I see it.

          Reply
  2. Repeat of comment very early Dec.
    Hillary has done what she aimed to do.
    This whole “Russia” nonsense was to take the attention away from the CONTENT of the leaked e-mails.
    The machinations and lies and deceit of the DNC was exposed and if the discussion had been on what was shown, the DNC could never allow the Bernie supporters to see what they had done to put Hillary in as the delegate. Bernie’s people would have stayed away from the election in disgust.
    So they poisoned the messenger.
    Every time the e-mails were mentioned, the DNC and MSM went hysterical about “Russia did it”, and successfully diverted any discussion from the content of the e-mails.
    They lost anyway, had they won, then it would have died a natural death.
    Now they are dreaming that they can mount a legal challenge based on ‘Foreign Interference” ain’t going to happen, but then most of their attempts in the last 12 months have failed.
    Obama’s strategy :
    Plan A : win vote
    Plan B : win recount
    Plan C : win Electoral College
    Plan D : win court challenge on “foreign intervention”
    Plan E : declare war on Russia
    Plan F : play golf (oh yes, get CIA to shoot Bill and Hill before they can pin the blame on him.)
    Edit added:
    We are now down to plan ‘E’ If Putin won’t bite and retaliate, Ob will have to dust off his clubs.
    Trump may just ask Sheriff Joe for details on that certificate investigation and wipe clean the whole 8 years. It would be easier than trying to fix things one-by-one.

    Reply
    • You know, you are so right…there are so many criminal aspects being lost in the shuffle. It all is like a huge puzzle, we will never be able to put together all the pieces. There are lives lost, unimaginable abuses, crimes that shock us beyond anything we could have ever imagined, and all these things have a connection to Hillary Clinton. I believe she is very much in control…is a node upon this planet who connects the Devil’s work from one Satanist to the other.

      Reply
  3. The best thing about Obama’s clumsy, last-ditch efforts to torpedo US-Russian relations, culminating in some transparent false flag to be blamed on Putin, is the majority of the world will now know precisely the sort of scum bags who have been running this country for the past generation. Trump may be stymied, thwarted, and possibly worse, but the ideas he has put into play in the American mind will not die. The worm has turned.

    Reply
  4. The President’s actions are very dangerous to America and Americans. He like his party the DNC and folks like Sharpton and Jackson have resorted to knee jerk politics, and it shows the President is going out like a child throwing a tantrum. I don’t hold and reservations for a leader who would place his people and nation at risk over a political agenda. The position transcends left politics, we are talking about American lives at stake. Aside from this he is sabotaging the next administration, which only succeeds in wasting tax dollars and costing us precious time in making progress.. I read a recent report on the environment and politics and the assessment was that the environmental impact will be minimal regardless of the administration’s stance. With this in mind, assuming administrations really don’t make that big of an impact over long term fundamental problems we face, why would the President place our relationships at risk and risk starting WWIII over a political tantrum? Hillary had already started trouble by talking down about Russia prior to her campaign, and she lit the fire during her campaign. I don’t see any evidence Russia had a direct impact on the elections. I believe they are grasping at straws. It’s beyond reproach to start a conflict over nothing but politics. The DNC knows they have nothing but knee jerk propaganda to build a party from, screw them, dirty bunch of bastards. Lets trash the DNC and the GOP and make America great again!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Casara Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.