Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a conservative, was identified for understanding the ‘real issue’ in the landmark ‘LGBT wedding cake’ case that is before the court. In contrast, a radical Marxist Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, broadcast to the world that she had never understood the very basics of the US Constitution, especially how the founding document views religious liberties.
And the difference between the two women should be studied in what is wrong with the radical left and why they should not be in power to defend the U.S. Constitution.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in the case.
“For nearly a decade, the justices have dodged and weaved on this clash of legal values, declining to hear some cases and punting on one involving a baker who refused to make custom wedding cakes for same-sex couples. But now the issue is back before a far more conservative court, a court that reached out to hear Monday’s case even before any same-sex couples complained that they were the victims of illegal discrimination,” NPR reported, adding:
The plaintiff in the case is business owner Lorie Smith, a Colorado web designer who for the past decade has created all kinds of custom websites for clients.
“The lead attorney who represented Colorado web designer Lorie Smith before the Supreme Court this week said she believed Justice Amy Coney Barrett “identified the real issue” in her client’s fight to refuse working on same-sex wedding websites, which violates her sincere religious beliefs,” Kaelan Deese reported for the Washington Examiner, adding:
Smith, a Littleton-based web and graphics designer, was represented by Alliance Defending Freedom CEO and attorney Kristen Waggoner, who told the Washington Examiner that Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act caused her client a six-year “constitutional injury” because it would compel her to create messages for clients whose lifestyle goes against Smith’s religious conscience.
republicbrief.com/scotus-justice-barrett-pointed-out-real-issue-in-lgbt-weddings-case/