by Ruby Henley
They did it. The Democrats seem to actually be getting their way by expecting Senator Charles Grassley to postpone Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s hearing set for Thursday. I have no doubt Senator Grassley will grant Diane Feinstein her request. He has put up a good fight against this, but I believe he is out of resources, and he is stuck between a rock and a hard place.
He must be sensitive to the women coming forward claiming ‘sexual assault’ by Judge Kavanaugh. In truth, none of us have a clue if these charges are in the least bit true. When one claims traumatic sexual assault, it is a given one can remember the cold hard facts – when, where, and how. Dr. Blasey Ford cannot do this, and it would seem to me if she cannot provide a witness of some sort her accusation cannot carry any weight in court?
Senator Dianne Feinstein, top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, says she wants to postpone the Kavanaugh hearing set for Thursday.
She said that a “disturbing new allegation” against Kavanaugh had to be examined before the judiciary committee could question Kavanaugh again.
“Thursday’s hearing should be canceled in light of a disturbing new allegation of sexual misconduct against Brett Kavanaugh. The FBI must investigate ALL allegations.”
— Sen Dianne Feinstein (@SenFeinstein) September 24, 2018
Feinstein is referring to an old classmate of Kavanaugh’s at Yale, who claims allegedly Kavanaugh exposed himself to her. Again, the facts are not precise, but she remembers someone yelling out Kavanaugh’s name.
Meanwhile, Judge Kavanaugh’s wife and young daughters are receiving death threats. They are not alone, Dr. Ford has been driven from her home. All for what? And the FBI to be called in to investigate? I don’t think so.
Trey Gowdy said, “an FBI probe did not mitigate the need for either Kavanaugh or Ford testifying before Congress. The Senate Judiciary Committee should hear from the witnesses to determine their credibility.”
Gowdy is very concerned that senators are claiming they believe Ford without listening to her claim in person.
“So the only role I can see the bureau playing is identifying other witnesses that may have knowledge. Some of that has already been done by Dr. Ford,” Gowdy said.
“Judge Kavanaugh’s defense is he wasn’t there, so you wouldn’t expect him to produce witnesses, but I don’t know what people expect the FBI to do,” he continued. “They’re not human polygraphs. They can’t tell us who is telling the truth.”
Finally someone who makes some sense!
In another instance, Gowdy made Democrat, Kirsten Gillibrand wish she had kept her mouth shut about Kavanaugh. Gillibrand is one of the many 2020 hopefuls trying to make a name for herself.
During a press conference, she accused Kavanaugh of being guilty, because the FBI was not investigating the case. Gillibrand was adamant that Kavanaugh was guilty, and Ford was truthful.
Gowdy says the FBI has no grounds to probe local crime allegations, but Gillibrand pointed to that as the proof Kavanaugh was guilty.
Gowdy responded that Gillibrand was calling for ‘communist dictatorship style show trial.’
Gowdy further stated, ‘we still live in America where there is a presumption of innocence.’
All I can say is We The People have someone speaking up for us in Trey Gowdy. He certainly expressed my opinion of what we are now dealing with here in America.
The Daily Caller reports –
“South Carolina Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy fired back at Senator Kirsten Gillibrand on “Special Report With Bret Baier” Thursday night. Gowdy criticized the New York Democrat for suggesting Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is guilty solely because he has not called for the FBI to investigate the claims made against him.
Bret Baier aired the clip of Sen. Gillibrand and asked Rep. Gowdy what he thought of it.
“Wow. When I walked into the studio tonight, there was a presumption of innocence and you did not have to prove your innocence. So, I’m a little surprised to hear what the senator from New York said,” Gowdy stated.
“Bret I’ll tell you this,” he continued. “I think that Dr. Ford met with Democratic legislators before the FBI investigated it. I know that she talked to The Washington Post before the FBI investigated it. The FBI did not have jurisdiction over state sex assault claims. If they want to locate witnesses, if there are witnesses that know whether or not this happened, I am all for it and I am all for them being compelled to testify.”
Now, I would like to discuss how the #METOO movement is now weaponized, and it has become a great threat to law and order here in this Country.
Here is the truth, and it needs to be recognized and one journalist is telling it like it is.
“I am tired of Democrats telling women when we should feel victimized. #MeToo has quickly evolved into terrorism. Winning by whining isn’t going to work,” says Christine Flowers, a syndicated columnist, talk radio host and immigration lawyer who in the past has described the #MeToo activism showcased during the Kavanaugh controversy as a “Trojan horse” sent to destroy conservatism.
“The direct attack on Brett Kavanaugh seems designed to target the poster boy for conservatism: pro-family, pro-life, pro-faith, pro free markets, pro-limited government. The attack on his character is exactly the sort of sexy, salacious salvo that you would expect from progressives who have gone from legitimate and balanced protest to the estrogen-fueled hysteria of the Women’s March,” Ms. Flowers recently wrote.
“I think that the #MeToo movement has had the opposite effect than the one feminists had hoped for, especially as we see how it has impacted the Kavanaugh nomination. It has alienated many moderate-to-conservative women who understand that sexual abuse is a problem, but who are angered at the way that #MeToo has been weaponized to advance a political agenda, namely, get Democratic women elected to office for the midterms and beyond,” Ms. Flowers tells Inside the Beltway.
“As someone who, in my immigration practice, deals regularly with women who are seeking asylum precisely because they have been abused — watching as the topic of abuse has been trivialized, monetized and politicized — is troubling and infuriating,” she says.
It does my heart good to be able to bring the words of Trey Gowdy and Christine Flowers to you. I have been feeling lost, as it seems no one has understood what We The People are dealing with here in this Country. We are literally fighting tooth and nail to save our Country against a Communist takeover. If we lose President Trump, I see this happening. But it is a blessing to read and share the words of Trey Gowdy and Christine Flowers. There is hope.
FROM VIDEO – QUOTE –
The Democrats set their trap to destroy Brett Kavanaugh.
They thought they executed their plan to perfection.
But then Trey Gowdy stepped up and silenced them with these jaw dropping comments.
A Democrat Senator Goes Too Far
Democrat’s attacks on Brett Kavanaugh grow more outrageous by the day.
New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand was the latest Democrat to pile on.
Gillibrand wants to run for President.
And every Democrat running for President wants to look like they are leading the fight to sink his nomination.
So she jumped at the chance to use Ford’s accusations to smear Kavanaugh.
But she crossed a line.
“Judge Kavanaugh has not asked to have the FBI review these claims,” she began.
“Is that the reaction of an innocent person? It is not!” Gillibrand ranted.
Gillibrand also said she believes Ford’s accusations because she wants to talk to the FBI.
“These are the hallmarks of truth, these are the hallmarks of someone who wants to be believed. I believe her because she’s telling the truth. She’s asking the FBI to investigate her claims,” the Senator added. “She’s asking for that kind of review, that investigative work, that oversight, that accountability. Someone who is lying does not ask the FBI to investigate their claims.”
Critics point out this is nonsense.
The accused does not hold the burden of proof.
It’s not up to them to demand an investigation to clear their name.
Despite what Senator Gillibrand thinks, this is still America.
In addition, Ford is in no danger of the FBI catching her lie.
This is a 36 year old “he said/she said” case.
Trey Gowdy Responds
Trey Gowdy blew Gillibrand and the Democrats out of the water.
Gowdy is a former federal prosecutor.
He understands the rules of evidence and what makes a credible case.
Gowdy pointed out that Gillibrand’s comments were un-American.
“Wow. When I walked into the studio tonight, there was a presumption of innocence and you did not have to prove your innocence. So, I am a little surprised to hear what the senator from New York said,” Gowdy stated in an interview on the Special Report with Brett Baier.
“Bret I will tell you this,” he continued. “I think that Dr. Ford met with Democratic legislators before the FBI investigated it. I know that she talked to The Washington Post before the FBI investigated it. The FBI did not have jurisdiction over state se-x assault claims. If they want to locate witnesses, if there are witnesses that know whether or not this happened, I am all for it and I am all for them being compelled to testify.”
Republicans Lose Patience
Democrats fought Kavanaugh’s nomination with every trick in the book.
Now they are dipping into the gutter.
They dragged out highly suspicious 36 year old allegations by a woman whose story does not add up under scrutiny.
Now they want to stage a Soviet-style trial to try and trip up Judge Kavanaugh.
We Will Keep You Up To Date On Any New Developments In This Ongoing Story.
END OF QUOTE