Socialism since 1970 would have left everyone poorer

The WSJ-linked numbers on real wealth growth since the mid-1970s check out in broad terms. Top 0.001 percent gains around 3,400-3,500 percent, top 0.01 percent around 2,200-2,300 percent, and the typical household far less, in the low hundreds of percent. The gap widened because of capital markets, tech, and productivity growth that concentrated returns at the top. USSR, Eastern Bloc, and Venezuela cases show nationalization, price controls, and capital flight crushed overall capital accumulation. Real household wealth growth would likely have been much weaker, closer to 50-150 percent or lower in inflation-adjusted terms, with frequent absolute declines. Top 0.001 percent wealth would have been flattened or reversed by expropriation. Absolute living standards for ordinary households would have ended lower than the actual U.S. path, even with a smaller gap.

Got a news tip or correction? Let us know

If you got something out of this, please chip in to keep this site running, or subscribe to go ad-free.

1 view