Stephen Paddock Was A Gunrunner With A Possible Australian Connection.

by Ruby Henley

This is just my theory, and to be honest with you…I really cannot fully make the connection in totality. However, I believe that Stephen Paddock was definitely a gunrunner, who could have been involved in transporting guns between the United States and Australia.  Why, Australia?
I just read the article below,  and my theory suddenly developed.  I see a connection between the event in Australia, in which the hand over of 51,000 firearms in illegal weapons amnesty took place between the citizens and the government.  Was that hand over a good thing?  Yes, of course, it was.  No country needs these type of weapons circulating on the streets, and there is no good that could come from it.  
The tragedy that preceded that “hand over” was the massacre of 35 people by a lone gunman at the former prison colony of Port Arthur in the island state of Tasmania in 1996. My question is where did all those guns go?  Or did Stephen Paddock supply Australia’s black market with guns?  For that matter the situation could have just resulted in opening up that route for Paddock.
It is being reported that the authorities in Las Vegas are having a difficult time in tracing Paddock’s arsenal he kept in his make shift lair from hell.  They are having difficulty tracking his guns that may have been purchased at gun shows, where one citizen sells a weapon to another person without a background check.
Investigators are also having trouble tracing bump stocks, because they do not have serial numbers that allow them to track when the devices change hands. Bump stocks allow gun owners to convert semi-automatic weapons to perform like machine guns.  
Paddock had an advantage and a setup that could support my theory.  He could launder money through his gambling, he could transport guns by plane as he was a pilot with two planes, and he most likely had connections which enabled him to escape being caught.
However, maybe those connections were being severed, and he knew he was going down. Maybe his dream life was coming to an end.  Maybe authorities in Australia discovered he was selling guns back to the Australians on the black market.
I am not saying he only ran arms between the US and Australia…I am just saying he could have taken advantage of the situation in Australia.  Further he did have the Australian connection through his girlfriend, and I do not think for one minute she did not know what was going on with Paddock.
My bottom line is these types of weapons have no place in society and should be banned.  However, there is always a black market for these evil things.  Possibly Stephen Paddock made his millions feeding that market, destroying lives as he did in the Las Vegas massacre.  QUOTE
Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said about 51,000 illegal firearms, a fifth of all illegal guns in the country, were surrendered in a three-month amnesty ending on Friday.
Turnbull said Australia’s tough gun ownership laws, which ban all semi-automatic rifles and semi-automatic shotguns, severely limit the chances of a Las Vegas-style mass shooting.
“The killer there (in Las Vegas) had a collection of semi-automatic weapons that a person in his position would simply not be able to acquire in Australia,” Turnbull told reporters in Sydney.
The shooting has focused attention on gun ownership rules in the United States.

READ  Possible troubles starting in Poland as local authorities make "vaccines" compulsory
READ  Conservative action group takes Australian government to Federal Court over travel ban

14 thoughts on “Stephen Paddock Was A Gunrunner With A Possible Australian Connection.

  1. When I read your articles I feel like a coach watching a talented young QB who has some skill, yet is extremely green and fresh out of college and throws those passes into triple coverage where you shake your head and say “what the fuck was he thinking?”
    ” I see a connection between the event in
    Australia, in which the hand over of 51,000 firearms in illegal weapons
    amnesty took place between the citizens and the government. Was that
    hand over a good thing? Yes, of course, it was. No country needs these
    type of weapons circulating on the streets, and there is no good that
    could come from it. ”
    What kind of communist psychological garbage is this? In one sentence you destroy your credibility because it shows your lack of awareness and research, or shows that you are trying to slide in communist jewish ideology. They are the global gun grabbers, and the very ones Americans (and indeed the world) are at war with. They run the US government, banks, CIA, FBI, NSA and everything else. THEY ALL WANT A TOTAL GUN BAN…….
    Do you even know what the real definition of LEGAL is? It is a right that you naturally have that the government takes away from you by force, then $ell$ it back to you as a privilege…..what was illegal, is now “legal”! Magic!
    I have stood in that cafe that killed so many people at Port Arthur and I can tell you right now that Australia is a FAR LESS SAFER PLACE NOW than it has EVER BEEN. Growing up here there were 10Xs as many guns as there were people. I had Vietnam vets in my neighborhood with M60s and M16s were everywhere. Guns would land on the docks here and for $1000 you could get 10 SKS Rifles and 1,000 round of ammunition.
    Do you understand that before Port Arthur mass shootings were very rare, and virtually negligible compared to other deaths? Society felt SAFE. The government and police BEHAVED THEMSELVES in fact everyone did, because everyone knew 10, 50, or 100 guys could get together with semi autos and correct anything if it went horribly wrong. Criminals stayed relatively low key because they had NO IDEA who had guns, and how many. There were not many rules regarding guns because it was public perception that it was none of the governments fucking business.
    Port Arthur was a wet op, Bryant was a patsy.
    They had a traveling gun confiscation group led by Rebecca Peters (funded by Soros) involved with the selling of anti-gun propaganda. Barry Unsworth said there would never be gun control in Australia until there is a mass shooting in Tasmania. Then it happened, and they had all the legislation ready to go and get rubber stamped. It was a coordinated effort. People should be asking WHY? Because they want to turn the world into Palestine, where THEY have all the guns, and the people have NOTHING, and can never do anything about their shitty situation. Guns give people in society the ability to get rid of bad governments.
    Do you not understand that simple equation?
    They banned guns, and the crime rate shot through the roof. Criminals now knew the chances of the average house having a gun were extremely low. Break ins, assaults, rapes went up, and remain high today and police and government scratch their head and think they can stop it. They can’t.
    The one thing that keeps BALANCE in society, is the ability of its GOOD PEOPLE having guns. The same guns as the police and military have access to. It is the mere THREAT that good people will rise up and do something that keeps everyone else bloody honest! They know if they push it, they can be killed. Now, they couldn’t give a shit because the threat is gone and they feel they can do whatever they want.
    If you want to look at a classic case of gun control gone really bad, look at Venezuela. They banned guns and now its one of the top murder and rape places in the world.
    I suggest you learn a hell of a lot more about guns and society before you make comments like you did, otherwise, you look like an agent spouting party propaganda, or at the very least, like that green rookie QB telling the coach how to play the game
    . Im sure I am not alone with my WTF moments when I read your articles. Years and Years of research has allowed many of us to have automatic read flags pop up. Our bullshit detectors are highly tuned instruments these days. So be careful what you write about, many are well researched in a lot of areas and you look kinda stupid sometimes. It tells us a lot about where you are at, and if it’s worth even reading your articles anymore.
    Here people, read this. The best look at the incident at Port Arthur.

    • Mike, I believe what you are saying, but my point is those types of weapons should not be in existence, but the whole mention of what happened in Australia was to open the reader up to what comes after this incident. It is a psychological warfare type of thing in that if Paddock had just used regular guns any of us could have, then it would have been very blatant what was really going on. It would have been too direct. However, with him using the assault altered rifles it is a way to go in and start with our second amendment rights in a very sneaky way. Most people do not see the need for the types of weapons Paddock had to be on the streets. That is the way into opening the door to go further, but I did not choose to say that, as I felt you ere smart enough to see it. However, the article was more about Paddock and the fact that someone like him would take advantage of the black market in Australia which now would be wide open.

      • Gun Control is a very important issue. I for one have no need to fight to keep Bump Stocks legal since they drastically reduce accuracy and in my opinion is a joke. As an ole M-60 machinegunner back in da day, and havin M-60 door gunners on a Chinook, I’d say one time it sounded like a 50 to 75 round continuous burst from a belt fed machinegun. Most likely a M-60 , perhaps a M-240. So I say it is very likely their wer several shooters in multiple locations as some claim.
        We DO KNOW the gubermint lied abut something so basic as the security cop bein shoot 6 minutes prior to the beginner of the attack and not 9 minutes after which resulted in the attack being stopped. That’s 15 minutes with no response from an establishment who handles tens if not hundreds of millions in a day. I can only imagine what their crisis intervention team is equipped with. Also no one has stated when the last “Suicide Shot” was. Was their one? Or did it happen during or before the shootin started? Why No cameras? I have read THEY claimed they were not workin that day. How about Paddocks cameras? They did not record either? So basically we have enough to reasonably state that the State is lyin to us Big Time. Everything else may be disinformation/lies also.
        Back to weapons. You really want the State to be ALL powerful? Believe it or NOT Pravda a few years ago had the best article explaining how the Bolsheviks disarmed Russia when they took over. Pravda claimed Russia was the most armed people at that time. Lenin and Trotsky went on to kill Millions. Hitler disarmed the Jews. How did that work out for them?
        The state has killed more of their OWN people in the 20th century than ALL the wars in the history of mankind. Mao has in the 1960’s murdered over 60 million of his own people and Stalin 30 million and Castro 30 thousand political prisoners and the Left still loves him.
        Bill Aires, Obama’s political mentor stated that 25 Million Americans could NOT be ReEducated. You KNOW what dat means in Commie Talk. The Left would enjoy killin millions of us, just read the comment sections. Da HIldeBeast called us ALL irredeemable deplorables. The same thing Stalin’s apparatus called people when they sent them to the gulags.
        At one time THE CFR/Trilateral Commission//Council of 300/Bilderberger and the Georgia Guidestones ALL call for only 500 Million Humans on the planet. Obama’s Science Czar and the Present Popes Science Advisor both called for only 500 Million people on the planet. You think that includes you or I? We are facing true evil and once the Satanic Globalist gain total control of their NWO, THEY will kill Millions of Americans and Billions around the world.
        An Armed person is a citizen, a disarmed person is a subject.
        Any citizen who has the right to vote should have the right to carry, open or concealed!

  2. I am trying not to laugh. I honestly have compassion for the innocents in Vegas, but, it is totally obvious the man was a gun runner for the FBI. All of a sudden, ISIS is in the Phillipines ??? His wife is shady as sh&t? ISIS has weapons in the Phillipines and dude has money to burn. Something stinks like the FBI. They nailed him because he got too obvious with his new found wealth..


    • I am thinking he did what so many do in his position as he started making deals on the side and broke away from the boss, and then they brought him down….kinda like the mob.


    • I did not take that into consideration, as I did know anything about his plane. However, I know he had two planes. I still feel he was a gunrunner, and I feel that there is an open black market in Australia, as I am sure the citizens who gave those guns up resent it.

  3. The gun running into Australia now goes right through the ports, no need for airplanes that can carry limited quantities. 90+% of Australia’s shipping containers go UNCHECKED. The Chinese now have an extremely long lease on the Port in Darwin up north. There are dodgy customs officials everywhere!
    There is a video I saw of a man who was concerned about the security at the ports in Australia he made a video driving down to it, through the gates that were open and parked next to a chinese vessel. He then put on an orange vest and walked onto the ship. They had a sign in register and so he put down a fake name and asked to see the captain. He walked right into the bridge and greeted the captain. He was SHOCKED how easy that was. There was NOTHING to stop containers being loaded onto trucks, that go right out the gate and onto the streets. THAT is how gun runners move equipment. They pay customs employees to “take a break at say 10am?”….they have Maritime security cards and most major ports are heavily locked down to the average user, but NOT ALL……
    This is why all the gun rules are USELESS. They have clamped down on GOOD PEOPLE (NON CRIMINALS ALREADY DEEMED NON CRIMINALS BY THE POLICE AND GOVERNMENT), and criminals don’t care about the law anyway. What is to stop rogue governments from bringing in weapons in this manner and giving them to groups that are politicially aligned or can be of some use? The Venezuelan government gives weapons to the “Collectivos” in a sort of mutual pack. The collectivos are notorious CRIMINALS, but have been given the green light by the government to do whatever they want, AS LONG AS THEY DO NOT GO NEAR THE GOVERNMENT OR TRY TO OVERTHROW IT…….so both parties benefit? Who looses? The good people who can’t defend themselves against the government, or the criminals.

    • Thanks for explaining that, Mike, it will happen here next. This incident will start it, and I remember when Jason Aldean came out after the incident about gun control. It is hard to believe this is happening and how the powers that be go about creating what they want….the evil manipulation, but it is how they behave, as they are Satanists.

  4. Interesting statistics…
    There are 30,000 gun related deaths per year by firearms, and this number is not disputed.
    The U.S. Population is 324,059,091 as of June 22, 2016.
    Do the math: 0.000000925% of the population dies from gun related actions each year. Statistically speaking, this is insignificant! What is never told, however, is a breakdown of those 30,000 deaths, to put them in perspective as compared to other causes of death:
    • 65% of those deaths are by suicide, which would never be prevented by gun laws.
    • 15% are by law enforcement in the line of duty and justified.
    • 17% are through criminal activity, gang and drug related or mentally ill persons – better known as gun violence.
    • 3% are accidental discharge deaths.
    So technically, “gun violence” is not 30,000 annually, but drops to 5,100. Still too many? Now lets look at how those deaths spanned across the nation.
    • 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
    • 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
    • 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
    • 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase over prior years)
    So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities. All 4 of those cities have strict gun laws, so it is not the lack of law that is the root cause.
    This basically leaves 3,825 for the entire rest of the nation, or about 75 deaths per state. That is an average because some States have much higher rates than others. For example, California had 1,169 and Alabama had 1.
    Now, who has the strictest gun laws by far? California, of course, but understand, it is not guns causing this. It is a crime rate spawned by the number of criminal persons residing in those cities and states. So if all cities and states are not created equal, then there must be something other than the tool causing the gun deaths.
    Are 5,100 deaths per year horrific? How about in comparison to other deaths? All death is sad and especially so when it is in the commission of a crime but that is the nature of crime. Robbery, death, rape, assault are all done by criminals. It is ludicrous to think that criminals will obey laws. That is why they are called criminals.
    But what about other deaths each year?
    • 40,000+ die from a drug overdose–THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT!
    • 36,000 people die per year from the flu, far exceeding the criminal gun deaths.
    • 34,000 people die per year in traffic fatalities(exceeding gun deaths even if you include suicide).
    Now it gets good:
    • 200,000+ people die each year (and growing) from preventable medical errors. You are safer walking in the worst areas of Chicago than you are when you are in a hospital!
    • 710,000 people die per year from heart disease. It’s time to stop the double cheeseburgers!
    So what is the point? If the liberal loons and the anti-gun movement focused their attention on heart disease, even a 10% decrease in cardiac deaths would save twice the number of lives annually of all gun-related deaths (including suicide, law enforcement, etc.). A 10% reduction in medical errors would be 66% of the total number of gun deaths or 4 times the number of criminal homicides…
    Simple, easily preventable 10% reductions! So you have to ask yourself, in the grand scheme of things, why the focus on guns?
    It’s pretty simple:
    Taking away guns gives control to governments. The founders of this nation knew that regardless of the form of government, those in power may become corrupt and seek to rule as the British did by trying to disarm the populace of the colonies. It is not difficult to understand that a disarmed populace is a controlled populace.
    Thus, the second amendment was proudly and boldly included in the U.S. Constitution. It must be preserved at all costs.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.