by John Ward Last Friday (which was the 13th, by the way), the British Medical Journal published an OpEd from Executive Editor Kamran Abbasi. Headed Covid19: politicisation , “corruption” and suppression of science,
This is laughable coming from the crowd that spent four years pushing the Russia-Trump collusion narrative from 2016 that was ginned up and promoted by the Hillary Clinton campaign. They
by Venus230 My body, my choice? Apparently not according to the New England Journal. More like Obey or else. Welcome to the new medical fascism of 2020. The New England Journal
via WSJ: It’s not easy to gain necessary perspective from the article, but the story does link to a page featuring various statistics related to the virus. According to the
The latest #Covid_19 paper in @TheLancet finds 24% fatality rate if admitted to hospital, a 97% fatality rate if requiring mechanical ventilation, and a 100% fatality rate if requiring ECMO.
There was a high level of variability between the excess of mortality experienced in the 14 countries we studied, with a minimal value of 33% in Finland and a maximal
by MasterDetective7 I've never seen an article like this in the Lancet. It's not a study, it's a cry for help. Chinese medical workers seem to be using academic journals
Spreads as easily as the common cold and influenza even if the patient has not, and will never show any symptoms, just by your breath! We also know it can
My patience has been exhausted. By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET. On January 9, the Wall Street Journal ran an article about the Fed’s repo operations with this headline: “Fed Adds $83.1 Billion in Short-term
The Wall Street Journal story on the China Deal is completely wrong, especially their statement on Tariffs. Fake News. They should find a better leaker! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)
by AccipiterQ here their main article on the front page right now The internet giant uses blacklists, algorithm tweaks and an army of contractors to shape what you see Every minute,
via WSJ: This city has been conducting a three-decade experiment in what happens when society stops enforcing bourgeois norms of behavior. It has done so in the name of compassion
Lewis, a mathematician who is skeptical of the so-called scientific consensus on climate change, wrote a paper in Aug. 2018 debunking the study. “The headlines all said that the oceans
via WSJ: Perhaps you’ve seen former Chairs of the Federal Reserve defending the central bank’s independence and foreswearing all political intentions. Fair enough. But then what are we to make
via WSJ: Political discourse nowadays is enough to depress anyone, and the media don’t help by ignoring good economic news. But buck up, Americans: Worker wages are growing much faster