Michael Every interviewed by Adam Taggart on Peak Prosperity For any problems they face, governments all over the world are now conditioned to simply deficit spend or issue new $trillions in ‘thin air’
by Adam Taggart For any problems they face, governments all over the world are now conditioned to simply deficit spend or issue new $trillions in ‘thin air’ currency. So how
If the banks have restructured such that debt risk has been placed in the hands of (debt) holders rather then the banks why are the banks involved at all? This
via trueeconomics: Since the start of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and through subsequent Euro area crises, the EU frameworks for reforming financial services have invariably been anchored to the need
by Graham Summers of Gains, Pains, & Capital Yesterday’s note caught a lot of attention. In it, we argued that investing in stocks today based on the Fed getting dovish is like buying
via Reuters: The Federal Reserve’s policy twist on Wednesday might seem just what the White House ordered, with a hold put on what President Donald Trump termed “loco” interest rate
by Dave Kranzler of Investment Research Dynamics The post-Christmas stock rally extended through Wednesday as the small-cap and tech stocks led the way, with the Russell 2000 up 14.3% and the Nasdaq up
Do you believe that we will see banks on the brink of failure during the next financial crisis? Or are they safe now? In one of the most volatile years
What would happen if a major bank failed or essentially was faced with failure? Bailout? Bail-in? IMF bailout? Restructuring? What would happen if a major bank failed? What would the
via Bloomberg: A key regulator of Wall Street banks has joined the Federal Reserve in warning about risky corporate borrowing that has reached record levels as lender protections are eroded. The Office
Credit Suisse’s systemic risk score reaches the highest since 2006/2007. Credit Suisse's systemic risk score reaches the highest since 2006/2007. pic.twitter.com/NYjPB4w1pg — Tracy Alloway (@tracyalloway) December 2, 2018 In the
This was was essentially breaking down the unseen danger. While one particular issue might be “small”, the counter-party risk could be great. It could pull everything down with it. One
by HomoSemiHabilis Hear me out on this because I think it’s the most empirical treatment of how things could very quickly go horribly wrong. Fact 1 : banks handle
via @paranoidbull: People in 1987 bought insurance so they could bet permanently on unlimited upside…now in 2018 people SELL INSURANCE so tget can use the proceeds to bet on unlimited upside!
Where do you see the global ECONOMY in 6 months? Better or worse? Is the economy really bouncing back? Well it’s time we take a deeper look. If we accept
This is the largest systemic fraud of the century – dwarfing the mortgage crisis – the @federalreserve has deliberately induced it aswell as done nothing about it thanks to @OccupyWisdom