The 30-year Treasury yield just hit 5.444%, its highest level since 2004.
The 10-year Treasury hit 5.12%, its highest level since 2007.
The 30-year mortgage is above 7%.
Diesel prices are at records.
McDonald’s says restaurant traffic could remain flat while inflation stays elevated.
And the S&P 500 is sitting near a record while roughly 52% of its components are below their 200-day moving averages.
That is a strange combination.
The index says risk appetite is alive.
The bond market says money is getting expensive.
The consumer says everything costs too much.
And companies are starting to plan around inflation that refuses to disappear.
The 2007 comparison deserves attention.
The last time the 10-year Treasury was around these levels was July 2007.
Three months later, the financial system was showing obvious signs of fracture.
American Home Mortgage filed for bankruptcy on August 6.
BNP Paribas froze redemptions on investment funds three days later because it could not properly value the underlying assets.
The Fed immediately started dealing with disruptions in money and credit markets.
The Nasdaq Composite subsequently lost roughly 56% over the following 16 months.
That does not mean 5% Treasury yields cause another 2008.
That would be lazy analysis.
The useful question is different:
What does today’s 5% yield expose?
In 2007, the pressure was sitting inside the mortgage and credit system.
Today the pressure points are different.
Government borrowing.
Corporate refinancing.
Household debt.
Commercial real estate.
Private credit.
AI capital spending.
Housing affordability.
And an equity market where a relatively small group of companies is carrying an enormous share of the index.
The bond market is forcing investors to pay attention to all of them at once.
The 30-year Treasury just crossed 5.44%.
That’s a brutal number for anyone who needs to borrow for 20 or 30 years.
And unlike the Fed funds rate, the Fed doesn’t simply set the 30-year yield.
The long end is responding to inflation, energy prices, Treasury issuance, growth expectations and the return investors demand for owning long-duration government debt.
Reuters reported that the latest surge followed stronger U.S. growth data and rising inflation pressures, while traders increased bets on another Fed hike.
That creates a problem for the usual “wait for the Fed to cut” argument.
The Fed could eventually lower its overnight rate.
The 30-year Treasury doesn’t have to follow.
Mortgage rates don’t have to return to 3%.
Corporate borrowing costs don’t have to return to the post-2008 world.
The bond market can keep demanding a higher price for long-term money.
And that’s exactly what we’re watching now.
The entire Treasury curve is moving toward the kind of yields investors haven’t seen since before the financial crisis.
Reuters noted that, aside from the two-year, Treasury maturities were trading above 5% Wednesday, with the five-year crossing 5% for the first time since 2007.
That changes the competition for capital.
Why take enormous equity risk when a Treasury can pay around 5%?
Why finance a marginal project at a high interest rate?
Why buy another house when the mortgage is above 7%?
Why refinance?
Why take on another corporate acquisition?
Why keep pouring money into low-return businesses?
The answer to all of those questions depends on expected returns.
And 5% risk-free money raises the hurdle for everything else.
That’s where the current market becomes more interesting than the headline S&P number.
The index is near a record.
But the average stock underneath it isn’t behaving like a record market.
Around 52% of S&P 500 components are below their 200-day moving averages.
And on September 23, there were roughly 378 new 52-week lows versus only 56 new highs.
That’s about 6.8 stocks making new lows for every stock making a new high.
This is not what a broad-based melt-up looks like.
It is concentration.
AI and a handful of enormous companies can keep the index elevated while capital quietly leaves hundreds of other stocks.
And higher Treasury yields make that concentration more consequential.
A company generating huge cash flows can absorb expensive capital.
A company dependent on refinancing cannot.
A company with a dominant balance sheet can keep building.
A company with thin margins may have to cut spending.
A company selling something consumers consider essential has more room.
A company selling something consumers can postpone has less.
That’s how higher rates spread through the economy.
Not through one giant crash.
Through thousands of smaller decisions.
And then there’s diesel.
The average U.S. diesel price has climbed to roughly $6.51 a gallon.
That matters because diesel isn’t just another consumer price.
It is an input into the entire physical economy.
Trucks move food.
Trucks move construction materials.
Trucks move manufactured goods.
Trucks move packages.
Higher diesel eventually becomes higher freight costs.
MarketWatch notes that freight contracts can take 30 to 60 days to reprice, meaning some transportation costs can hit customers with a delay.
So today’s fuel shock can become tomorrow’s grocery inflation.
That creates another headache for the Fed.
Higher rates can suppress demand.
They cannot make diesel cheaper.
And now McDonald’s is giving us a look at what that does at the consumer level.
The company says it expects industry traffic in its major markets to remain flat while inflation remains elevated.
McDonald’s is responding with an $8.5 billion franchisee support program through 2036.
It wants roughly 250 basis points of restaurant-level efficiency gains, worth about $100,000 in annual cash-flow benefits for the average U.S. restaurant.
It is also targeting additional market share in chicken and beverages while beef costs continue climbing.
That’s a company preparing for consumers who still spend money but have become much harder to convince to spend more.
And beef is part of that calculation.
McDonald’s says beef prices have risen about 14% over the past year and nearly doubled over five years in its largest markets.
So the response isn’t simply another price increase.
It’s changing the product mix.
Push chicken.
Push beverages.
Push value.
Cut operating costs.
Automate.
Increase throughput.
Steal market share.
That is what inflation does after it lasts long enough.
It starts changing corporate strategy.
And the consumer responds in the same way.
Cheaper protein.
Cheaper restaurant.
Used car.
No refinance.
No house move.
Delay the appliance.
Wait on the renovation.
Keep the old mortgage.
Buy less.
The economy doesn’t have to enter a recession for this behavior to matter.
It only has to become persistent.
Because all of those decisions reduce turnover.
Less housing turnover.
Less refinancing.
Less discretionary consumption.
Less business expansion at the margin.
More price shopping.
More discounting.
More capital flowing toward companies that can generate cash immediately.
That’s the economy splitting in two.
The headline economy can remain resilient.
AI investment can explode.
The S&P can remain near a record.
GDP can keep growing.
Meanwhile, the cost of participating in the economy keeps rising.
And the 2007 comparison gives us one reason to pay attention.
Not because history says 5% Treasury yields = another financial crisis.
History doesn’t say that.
History says something more useful:
High long-term rates can reveal weaknesses that are invisible while money is cheap.
That’s the part worth investigating now.
Where is today’s leverage?
Who needs to refinance?
Who built a business model around cheap capital?
Which companies only look cheap because the index is being carried by a handful of giants?
How much AI investment depends on continued access to enormous amounts of capital?
How much commercial real estate debt eventually has to refinance?
How much household debt gets rolled over at today’s rates?
How much Treasury debt has to be refinanced at a much higher coupon than the debt being retired?
Those are the questions underneath the 5% yield.
Because the dangerous part of expensive money isn’t the number on the screen.
It’s what the number discovers.
Not financial advice.
Got a news tip or correction? Let us know
If you got something out of this, please chip in to keep this site running, or subscribe to go ad-free.
1 view