The Conspiracy of Scientific Fraud = 70% of Experiments Cannot Be Replicated, 50% of Researchers Cannot Reproduce Their Own Results

by SevereAnxiety76

Scientists are shameless whores when it comes to guilt by omission.

Whenever they see evidence they don’t like, they ignore it.

It gets worse, then they conspire to shame any offending author, cut his funding, and often provide fake counter-arguments to preserve their status quo point of view. Ask Graham Hancock.

1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility

www.nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970

Delusion: Swiss Bank Says Free Renewables By 2030 – thenextweb.com

thenextweb.com/insider/2018/08/14/analyst-renewable-will-be-effectively-free-by-2030/

The above link is fake news. You may remember when banks said collateralized debt obligations were way too much for our pretty little heads to understand, which was of course, just before the financial collapse.

Is the Peer Review Process a Scam? – enago academy

www.enago.com/academy/is-peer-review-process-a-scam/

“In 2005, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) created a software program called SCIgen that randomly combined strings of words to generate fake computer science papers. The objective of the exercise was to prove that the peer review process was fundamentally flawed and the conferences and journals would accept meaningless papers. After being notified by other researchers who were tracking those SCIgen papers, journals were still quietly pulling articles as late as 2014.”

I remember a story about French post-modern philosophers in the 1970s, who received a document from a renowned physicist who pranked them. He took all their, what Chomsky calls, unintelligibly garbled reasoning, and he rearranged and regurgitated all those fine words and blessed them with a kiss. That kiss was a tacit endorsement of their reasoning. They forgot to verify and corroborate what the physicist said before publishing it. They looked like fools.

Let’s end reviewer fraud – Publons

publons.com/blog/lets-end-reviewer-fraud/

107 cancer papers retracted due to peer review fraud | Ars Technica

arstechnica.com/science/2017/04/107-cancer-papers-retracted-due-to-peer-review-fraud/

Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science – Google Scholar

scholar.google.ca/scholar_url?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014107680609900414&hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm0D9oaDV4YG6rsHdvwE8ygJ8b4dgA&nossl=1&oi=scholarr

We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!

Why scientists need to do more about research fraud – Guardian

www.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2018/jan/04/science-fraud-research-misconduct

Canadian researchers who commit scientific fraud are protected by privacy laws – The Toronto Star

www.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2018/jan/04/science-fraud-research-misconduct

China cracks down after investigation finds massive peer-review fraud – science mag