The experts should be judged by their record, which at present is highly unimpressive

HE’S RIGHT ABOUT A LOT: Rand Paul Is Right About Experts.

The Internet is having a bit of fun with Rand Paul’s claim during a Tuesday Senate committee hearing that “We shouldn’t presume that a group of experts somehow knows what’s best” (here’s Tommy Beer with more). After all, they’re the experts. Shouldn’t we get out of the way and do as the experts tell us?

No. Rand Paul is right.

Friedrich Hayek was famously skeptical of experts because they have a tendency to stretch beyond their expertise and make claims, recommendations, or policies that are beyond the narrow confines of their expertise. They also tend to collapse social problems into frameworks and models that seem easy to manipulate but that leave out a lot of important on-the-ground knowledge that, Hayek argued, is of a kind that is inaccessible to an outside observer. In short, it is easy to mistake a model for the actual underlying reality. It is just as easy to identify important considerations and act as if they are the only.

The experts should be judged by their record, which at present is highly unimpressive

Related: The Suicide of Expertise.

COVID-19 outbreak will ‘get worse before it gets better,’ experts say.

FAUCI’S STAR SEEMS TO HAVE DIMMED: Rand Paul rips Fauci’s coronavirus response, says schools should be reopened.

h/t GR