US flirts with WW3 on pretext of most transparent false flag in human history.

Sharing is Caring!


Let’s use logic and reasoning here:
– ASSAD had everything to lose and nothing to gain by poisoning his own people. He would have known that the US and perhaps NATO would attack Syria if he tried this.
– ISIS had EVERYTHING to gain by carrying out a false flag attack and blaming ASSAD. All ISIS had to do was get Sarin gas from Saddam’s old army (many ISIS are from Saddam’s army) and plant it in Syria, use it to frame ASSAD and get the US to attack ASSAD for them!
– The American IC has been compromised since 2003 when we started a fucking endless war in the ME over “Weapons of Mass Destruction” which of course DO NOT EXIST. That was the biggest intel mistake in the history of the modern world. So why should we trust them now.
– John McStain, Linsday Grahamcracka all the NEOCONS and MIC’s and warmongering fucks are celebrating this. Even the fucking SPD (leftist socialist dumbfuck party in Germany is celebrating!)
– Assad and Russia are fighting ISIS. Instead of HELPING them we are bombing them?
-Conclusion: ASSAD did not gas his own people.
Some people have suggested that this was a strategic move on Trump’s part to show other countries we mean business. I don’t buy it.
I could go on and on but needless to say, I HOPE I am wrong about this and I hope that Trump has a better grasp of the situation then little old me using my brain and logic.
I *still* support Trump because we have NO OPTION. If we don’t support TRUMP, the libtards will swoop in and have Trump removed. If that happens we will have a civil war on our hands in the USA. If that happens all bets are off.
 
Neocons, MICs, Libtards, McStain are all celebrating!
 
Look at these headlines:
Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi endorse Trump’s attack in Syria

www.washingtonexaminer.com/chuck-schumer-nancy-pelosi-endorse-trumps-attack-in-syria/article/2619622
McCain, Graham applaud Syrian airstrikes

thehill.com/policy/defense/327731-mccain-graham-applaud-syrian-airstrikes
ISIS, Al-Qaeda Praise Trump’s Attack
www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-07/isis-al-qaeda-praise-trumps-attack
Hillary Clinton: ‘Take out’ Assad’s air fields
www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-take-out-assads-air-fields/article/2619603
 
Spokesperson for Russian Defense Ministry uses aerial footage to point out the US military’s poor aim
youtu.be/xIB186gutnw
 
h/t Nicomachus

See also  NOT FIT FOR OFFICE! ‘Biden will resign or face the 25th Amendment’…
See also  Shortest Recession In History Sets Up Next Recession
1,296 views

1 thought on “US flirts with WW3 on pretext of most transparent false flag in human history.

  1. http://www.truth-out.org/progressivepicks/item/33180-wikileaks-reveals-how-the-us-aggressively-pursued-regime-change-in-syria-igniting-a-bloodbath
    A December 13, 2006 cable, “Influencing the SARG [Syrian government] in the End of 2006,”1 indicates that, as far back as 2006 – five years before “Arab Spring” protests in Syria – destabilizing the Syrian government was a central motivation of US policy. The author of the cable was William Roebuck, at the time chargé d’affaires at the US embassy in Damascus. The cable outlines strategies for destabilizing the Syrian government. In his summary of the cable, Roebuck wrote:
    We believe Bashar’s weaknesses are in how he chooses to react to looming issues, both perceived and real, such as the conflict between economic reform steps (however limited) and entrenched, corrupt forces, the Kurdish question, and the potential threat to the regime from the increasing presence of transiting Islamist extremists. This cable summarizes our assessment of these vulnerabilities and suggests that there may be actions, statements, and signals that the USG can send that will improve the likelihood of such opportunities arising.
    This cable suggests that the US goal in December 2006 was to undermine the Syrian government by any available means, and that what mattered was whether US action would help destabilize the government, not what other impacts the action might have. In public the US was in favor of economic reform, but in private the US saw conflict between economic reform and “entrenched, corrupt forces” as an “opportunity.” In public, the US was opposed to “Islamist extremists” everywhere; but in private it saw the “potential threat to the regime from the increasing presence of transiting Islamist extremists” as an “opportunity” that the US should take action to try to increase.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.