Whistleblower Dennis Montgomery Is Living On Borrowed Time – Waiting With Data That Proves Trump Transition Team Was Monitored.

by Pamela Williams
Montgomery is in poor health. He suffered a brain aneurysm and a related multi-infarct
stroke on May 12, 2014. He suffered both a hemorrhagic stroke (caused by ruptured blood
vessels that cause brain bleeding) and ischemic stroke (loss of blood flow). This type of stroke
has a 70-80% death rate in the first 28 days, which miraculously Montgomery survived. He was
in the hospital for two months, through July 2014. He has been left permanently disabled and
 partially paralyzed. During two months of hospitalization he had only a limited ability to
communicate but he slowly recovered to some extent. See Exhibit 1.
Montgomery could suffer a similar or repeated event causing him to die at any time. He
could also lose the ability to communicate from the brain injury already experienced or from a
related, repeat neurological event. There is a continuing danger that complications or related or
repeat stroke events could injury his memory.
The above was taken from “Case 1:13-cv-00851-RJL Document 129 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 10” in which Dennis Montgomery, a former employee of the NSA is suing President Obama, because he wants to have his time alone with legal authorities to present an immense amount of data he collected as a NSA employee turned whistleblower.  He turned whistleblower as he could not live with what the NSA was illegally doing to the American people.  But most of all the NSA was spying on prominent people like Donald Trump, Supreme Court Justices, Judges, and basically anyone they please.
Larry Klayman of FREEDOM WATCH and Montgomery are running out of time in their race to get Montgomery a hearing with the right legal authorities.  Montgomery has proof that President Trump and his Transition Team were monitored from November of 2016, December 2016, and January 2016.  Trump was surveilled as he was choosing his Cabinet Members and creating his new agenda as President.
The below steps occurred in this case:

  1. Montgomery left the NSA as an employee turned whistleblower with a massive amount of data to prove the NSA was illegally surveilling American citizens.
  2. Montgomery went to Larry Klayman at FREEDOM WATCH asking him to help in the revealing of this material.
  3. Klayman began his quest to get a hearing for Montgomery.  He began in 2015, but he has yet to achieve his goal.
  4. Klayman filed a lawsuit: KLAYMAN V OBAMA  www.scribd.com/document/265437803/KLAYMAN-v-OBAMA-129-D-d-C-1-13-Cv-00851-129-Motion-for-ExParte-Interview-of-Montgomery
  5. Klayman is still waiting to secure Montgomery a hearing to give his testimony and data to the correct authorities.
  6. FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY has record of this, has ignored it, lied to Congress on Capitol Hill on March 20, 2017 about having no information of Trump surveillance…even though he knew this case existed.  I am waiting to hear the word “perjury” come up for Comey.  I, also, checked to see if President Trump could fire Comey, and, yes, he can.
  7. Klayman and Montgomery sent information to Devin Nunes and others on Capitol Hill of this situation when Nunes asked anyone to come forward who has any information on Trump wiretapping.
  8. No one but Nunes bothered to make this public.

The following are documents from FREEDOM WATCH AND LARRY KLAYMAN about this matter:
The article below was written in NEWSMAX by Larry Klayman:  www.newsmax.com/LarryKlayman/chariman-nunes-fbi-james-comey-montgomery-whitsleblower/2017/03/19/id/779551/
As I have written in this Newsmax blog and elsewhere particularly of late, my client, former NSA and CIA contractor Dennis Montgomery, holds the keys to disproving the false claims of those representatives and senators on the House and Senate intelligence committees, reportedly as well as FBI Director James Comey, that there is no evidence that the president and his men were wiretapped.
Montgomery left the NSA and CIA with 47 hard drives and over 600 million pages of information, much of which is classified, and sought to come forward legally as a whistleblower to appropriate government entities, including congressional intelligence committees, to expose that the spy agencies were engaged for years in systematic illegal surveillance on prominent Americans, including the chief justice of the Supreme Court, other justices, 156 judges, prominent businessmen such as Donald Trump, and even yours truly. Working side by side with Obama’s former Director of National Intelligence (DIA), James Clapper, and Obama’s former Director of the CIA, John Brennan, Montgomery witnessed “up close and personal” this “Orwellian Big Brother” intrusion on privacy, likely for potential coercion, blackmail or other nefarious purposes.  
But when Montgomery came forward as a whistleblower to congressional intelligence committees and various other congressmen and senators, including Senator Charles Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who, like Comey, once had a reputation for integrity, he was “blown off;” no one wanted to even hear what he had to say. The reason, I suspect, is that Montgomery’s allegations were either too hot to handle, or the congressional intelligence and judiciary committees already knew that this unconstitutional surveillance was being undertaken. Moreover, given the power of the NSA, CIA, and DNI, for congressional committee heads to take action to legitimately and seriously investigate and if necessary recommend prosecution of officials like Clapper and Brennan could, given the way Washington works, result in the spy agencies disclosing and leaking (as occurred recently with General Michael Flynn), the details of their mass surveillance, ruining the careers if not personal lives of any politician who would take them on.
After Montgomery was turned away as a whistleblower, he came to me at Freedom Watch. With the aid of the Honorable Royce C. Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, who I had come to respect and trust over the years of my public interest advocacy, we brought Montgomery forward to FBI Director James Comey, through his General Counsel James Baker. Under grants of immunity, which I obtained through Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis, Montgomery produced the hard drives and later was interviewed under oath in a secure room at the FBI Field Office in the District of Columbia. There he laid out how persons like then-businessman Donald Trump were illegally spied upon by Clapper, Brennan, and the spy agencies of the Obama administration. He even claimed that these spy agencies had manipulated voting in Florida during the 2008 presidential election, which illegal tampering resulted in helping Obama to win the White House.
This interview, conducted and videoed by Special FBI Agents Walter Giardina and William Barnett, occurred almost two years ago, and nothing that I know of has happened since. It would appear that the FBI’s investigation was buried by Comey, perhaps because the FBI itself collaborates with the spy agencies to conduct illegal surveillance. In landmark court cases which I filed after the revelations of Edward Snowden, the Honorable Richard Leon, a colleague of Judge Lamberth, had ruled that this type of surveillance constituted a gross violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. (See www.freedomwatchusa.org for more information.)
A few months ago, given FBI’s seeming inaction in conducting a bona fide timely investigation of the treasure trove of information Montgomery had produced and testified to, I went to Chairman Bob Goodlatte of the House Judiciary Committee, as I had done earlier with Senator Grassley, since Montgomery had revealed that judges had been spied upon, and asked his staff to inquire of Director Comey the status of the investigation. I have heard nothing back from Goodlatte or his staff and they have not responded to recent calls and emails.
So last Thursday, I traveled to Capital Hill to personally meet with Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Ca.) of the House Intelligence Committee and, when his scheduler claimed that he was “unavailable,” forcefully pushed for a meeting with one of his committee lawyers, Allen R. Souza, and fully briefed him about Montgomery and the FBI’s apparent cover-up. I told this staff intel lawyer to inform Chairman Nunes of the facts behind this apparent cover-up before the committee holds its hearing on the alleged Trump wiretaps and questions Comey this Monday, March 20, in open session. My expressed purpose: to have Chairman Nunes of the  House Intelligence Committee ask Comey, under oath, why he and his FBI have seemingly not moved forward with the Montgomery investigation.

READ  Alert: They Are Going To Try To Ban Donald Trump From Running For President For The Rest Of His Life
READ  Donald Trump is the first outgoing US president not to handover the 'nuclear football' at inauguration