Whistleblower Dennis Montgomery Is Living On Borrowed Time – Waiting With Data That Proves Trump Transition Team Was Monitored.

Sharing is Caring!

by Pamela Williams
 
Montgomery is in poor health. He suffered a brain aneurysm and a related multi-infarct
stroke on May 12, 2014. He suffered both a hemorrhagic stroke (caused by ruptured blood
vessels that cause brain bleeding) and ischemic stroke (loss of blood flow). This type of stroke
has a 70-80% death rate in the first 28 days, which miraculously Montgomery survived. He was
in the hospital for two months, through July 2014. He has been left permanently disabled and
 partially paralyzed. During two months of hospitalization he had only a limited ability to
communicate but he slowly recovered to some extent. See Exhibit 1.
Montgomery could suffer a similar or repeated event causing him to die at any time. He
could also lose the ability to communicate from the brain injury already experienced or from a
related, repeat neurological event. There is a continuing danger that complications or related or
repeat stroke events could injury his memory.
 
The above was taken from “Case 1:13-cv-00851-RJL Document 129 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 10” in which Dennis Montgomery, a former employee of the NSA is suing President Obama, because he wants to have his time alone with legal authorities to present an immense amount of data he collected as a NSA employee turned whistleblower.  He turned whistleblower as he could not live with what the NSA was illegally doing to the American people.  But most of all the NSA was spying on prominent people like Donald Trump, Supreme Court Justices, Judges, and basically anyone they please.
 
Larry Klayman of FREEDOM WATCH and Montgomery are running out of time in their race to get Montgomery a hearing with the right legal authorities.  Montgomery has proof that President Trump and his Transition Team were monitored from November of 2016, December 2016, and January 2016.  Trump was surveilled as he was choosing his Cabinet Members and creating his new agenda as President.
 
The below steps occurred in this case:

  1. Montgomery left the NSA as an employee turned whistleblower with a massive amount of data to prove the NSA was illegally surveilling American citizens.
  2. Montgomery went to Larry Klayman at FREEDOM WATCH asking him to help in the revealing of this material.
  3. Klayman began his quest to get a hearing for Montgomery.  He began in 2015, but he has yet to achieve his goal.
  4. Klayman filed a lawsuit: KLAYMAN V OBAMA  www.scribd.com/document/265437803/KLAYMAN-v-OBAMA-129-D-d-C-1-13-Cv-00851-129-Motion-for-ExParte-Interview-of-Montgomery
  5. Klayman is still waiting to secure Montgomery a hearing to give his testimony and data to the correct authorities.
  6. FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY has record of this, has ignored it, lied to Congress on Capitol Hill on March 20, 2017 about having no information of Trump surveillance…even though he knew this case existed.  I am waiting to hear the word “perjury” come up for Comey.  I, also, checked to see if President Trump could fire Comey, and, yes, he can.
  7. Klayman and Montgomery sent information to Devin Nunes and others on Capitol Hill of this situation when Nunes asked anyone to come forward who has any information on Trump wiretapping.
  8. No one but Nunes bothered to make this public.

The following are documents from FREEDOM WATCH AND LARRY KLAYMAN about this matter:
www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/170321-Final%20Whistleblower%20Letter.pdf
 
The article below was written in NEWSMAX by Larry Klayman:  www.newsmax.com/LarryKlayman/chariman-nunes-fbi-james-comey-montgomery-whitsleblower/2017/03/19/id/779551/
 
As I have written in this Newsmax blog and elsewhere particularly of late, my client, former NSA and CIA contractor Dennis Montgomery, holds the keys to disproving the false claims of those representatives and senators on the House and Senate intelligence committees, reportedly as well as FBI Director James Comey, that there is no evidence that the president and his men were wiretapped.
Montgomery left the NSA and CIA with 47 hard drives and over 600 million pages of information, much of which is classified, and sought to come forward legally as a whistleblower to appropriate government entities, including congressional intelligence committees, to expose that the spy agencies were engaged for years in systematic illegal surveillance on prominent Americans, including the chief justice of the Supreme Court, other justices, 156 judges, prominent businessmen such as Donald Trump, and even yours truly. Working side by side with Obama’s former Director of National Intelligence (DIA), James Clapper, and Obama’s former Director of the CIA, John Brennan, Montgomery witnessed “up close and personal” this “Orwellian Big Brother” intrusion on privacy, likely for potential coercion, blackmail or other nefarious purposes.  
But when Montgomery came forward as a whistleblower to congressional intelligence committees and various other congressmen and senators, including Senator Charles Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who, like Comey, once had a reputation for integrity, he was “blown off;” no one wanted to even hear what he had to say. The reason, I suspect, is that Montgomery’s allegations were either too hot to handle, or the congressional intelligence and judiciary committees already knew that this unconstitutional surveillance was being undertaken. Moreover, given the power of the NSA, CIA, and DNI, for congressional committee heads to take action to legitimately and seriously investigate and if necessary recommend prosecution of officials like Clapper and Brennan could, given the way Washington works, result in the spy agencies disclosing and leaking (as occurred recently with General Michael Flynn), the details of their mass surveillance, ruining the careers if not personal lives of any politician who would take them on.
After Montgomery was turned away as a whistleblower, he came to me at Freedom Watch. With the aid of the Honorable Royce C. Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, who I had come to respect and trust over the years of my public interest advocacy, we brought Montgomery forward to FBI Director James Comey, through his General Counsel James Baker. Under grants of immunity, which I obtained through Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis, Montgomery produced the hard drives and later was interviewed under oath in a secure room at the FBI Field Office in the District of Columbia. There he laid out how persons like then-businessman Donald Trump were illegally spied upon by Clapper, Brennan, and the spy agencies of the Obama administration. He even claimed that these spy agencies had manipulated voting in Florida during the 2008 presidential election, which illegal tampering resulted in helping Obama to win the White House.
 
This interview, conducted and videoed by Special FBI Agents Walter Giardina and William Barnett, occurred almost two years ago, and nothing that I know of has happened since. It would appear that the FBI’s investigation was buried by Comey, perhaps because the FBI itself collaborates with the spy agencies to conduct illegal surveillance. In landmark court cases which I filed after the revelations of Edward Snowden, the Honorable Richard Leon, a colleague of Judge Lamberth, had ruled that this type of surveillance constituted a gross violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. (See www.freedomwatchusa.org for more information.)
A few months ago, given FBI’s seeming inaction in conducting a bona fide timely investigation of the treasure trove of information Montgomery had produced and testified to, I went to Chairman Bob Goodlatte of the House Judiciary Committee, as I had done earlier with Senator Grassley, since Montgomery had revealed that judges had been spied upon, and asked his staff to inquire of Director Comey the status of the investigation. I have heard nothing back from Goodlatte or his staff and they have not responded to recent calls and emails.
So last Thursday, I traveled to Capital Hill to personally meet with Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Ca.) of the House Intelligence Committee and, when his scheduler claimed that he was “unavailable,” forcefully pushed for a meeting with one of his committee lawyers, Allen R. Souza, and fully briefed him about Montgomery and the FBI’s apparent cover-up. I told this staff intel lawyer to inform Chairman Nunes of the facts behind this apparent cover-up before the committee holds its hearing on the alleged Trump wiretaps and questions Comey this Monday, March 20, in open session. My expressed purpose: to have Chairman Nunes of the  House Intelligence Committee ask Comey, under oath, why he and his FBI have seemingly not moved forward with the Montgomery investigation.
 
WE THE PEOPLE MUST BE VIGILANT WITH LARRY KLAYMAN IN HOLDING COMEY TO THE FIRE.  IT IS CLEAR HE HAS COMMITTED PERJURY.  DENNIS MONTGOMERY MUST BE HEARD, AND THOSE WHO ARE GUILTY OF SURVEILLING AMERICANS AND UNMASKING AMERICANS MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.
 
BUT MOST OF ALL IN MY OPINION, FBI DIRECTOR COMEY HAS DESTROYED OUR FBI, AND THAT CANNOT BE IGNORED OR FORGIVEN.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNfEpBrD6Fg
 
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE7GZbx3Nx0

See also  We are living through an insane scenario that future historians will write about for years: Americans were told to take medical advice on COVID-19 from the same guy who funded the creation of COVID-19.
See also  Project Veritas: "Two Healthcare Insiders at Aegis Living Blow Whistle on Alleged Elder Abuse and Medical Fraud"
27,424 views

58 thoughts on “Whistleblower Dennis Montgomery Is Living On Borrowed Time – Waiting With Data That Proves Trump Transition Team Was Monitored.

  1. Washington is made up of lawyers, and if you know anything about lawyers you know that after big case of arguing and making accusations is over they go drink with each other, have barbecues at each other’s homes, and laugh about the show they put on in court. I’ve come to believe this is the same attitude that is held by members of Congress. They seem to be fighting each other and working for their prospective clients (Constituency) and trying to make the world a better place, but in reality they are self-centered and self-serving. It’s all a show and as far as they are concerned it cannot come to an end because that would mean they would not be important and have nothing to run on an election time.

    • You are right. They seem to own the world, while their clients wait long hours in the background not being taken seriously. This whistleblower is dying, but he wants to make sure his materials are have a chance to see the light of day and be taken seriously. It is important to we the people that James Comey is proven the liar he is.

      • I sent out twenty letters and ran a Go Fund Me campaign to get a lawyer for a police brutality case but could find neither lawyer nor funders. Many lawyers represent the police and the rest don’t want to go up against them.

    • It’s worse than that, as our political representatives are closely selected for various weaknesses, moral or financial that can be exploited by people with agendas not congruent with America’s best interests.

    • The floating SCUM inside the Beltway at the top of the NSA, CIA & FBI need to
      be ‘RENDITIONED’ GOOD LOYAL CIA AGENTS.
      Waterboard them these personnel until they sing like Canaries !

  2. Hasn’t anybody bothered to look up the name “Dennis Montgomery”? I think he might be a fraud and part of his staying out of jail is now to play fraud again.

    • DORK !!! Do you really think a licensed lawyer would represent a client who didn’t have actual “evidence” ??
      Further, do you see the names of all the judges in this article who “certified” Montgomery’s evidence?
      And — he cannot be arrested after being granted immunity — hence, no reason to “hide” from arrest.
      Perhaps you should take an online course on judicial process.

      • DORK !!! Do you really think a licensed lawyer would represent a client who didn’t have actual “evidence” ??

        I think a lawyer is a professional piece of shit that would do anything to win a case. A group of lawyers got Casey Anthony off a murder charge after she murdered her child. They have no ethics. They’re scum. That’s their job description – they don’t represent the law, they represent their clients, at any cost. The most celebrated lawyers are simply sociopaths. Hillary Clinton is a lawyer, and she’s most certainly a sociopath.
        My point is, Dennis Montgomery isn’t a reliable source. I suspect this is a planted piece of propaganda, and because he’s been exposed as a fraud once, he’s now working as a professional propagandist liar to discredit independent media who have picked up this, probably false, story.
        Furthermore, judges aren’t a reliable source either. You perhaps don’t understand just how corrupt this government is. Stop thinking it as a body that represents the public, and think of it as a mafia. When you understand it’s really a mafia, everything they do makes complete sense and is entirely logical.

        • The “planted piece of propaganda” was settled IN COURT BACK in 2014 when three (3) U.S. District Court Judges found Obama GUILTY of wiretapping. Hence, former Department ofJustice Prosecutor Larry Klayman and CIA contractor Dennis Montgomery have never been debunked — only silenced. Further, alleging that judges aren’t a reliable source is laughable, and merely your liberal, Clintonian evasion of what were settled cases long ago.

          • Gee, where is the data from these 47 hard disks. It’s been a week.
            Golly, I wonder when they will be published. I guess the Internet just doesn’t have enough space, eh, Karen?

      • Karen thank you for your kind response ! Respectfully yours, Captain Dan Stillmunks, Hesperia, CA 92345 U.S.A.
        P.S. Next time some jerk calls you the ”c” word tell him, “Just because you can’t get it up anymore–don’t take it out on everybody else!” Works every time

    • PS: What you “think” is irrelevant to this discussion. Case law records defy you. But hey … keep scratching and clawing for a way out.

      • For the millionth time, has anybody bothered to look up Dennis Montogmery. He’s a convicted fraudster, you stupid morons. Why do you believe this guy? Do some basic thinking you easily duped morons.

        • You can dribble down your chin “100 million more times” if you like, but it won’t matter. The 600 million OBAMA SPY DOCS & 47 HARD-DRIVES supercede your bad-baby-poopy-diaper-tantrums, as do the two (2) judges in the case … Lambreth and Curtis … who found in favor of Montgomery, and condemned Obama’s “wiretaps.” So you’ll have to work much, much harder than that. But we appreciate you scratching and clawing for a way out.

          • You can dribble down your chin “100 million more times” if you like, but
            it won’t matter. The 600 million OBAMA SPY DOCS & 47 HARD-DRIVES
            supercede you

            Well, it’s been over a week.
            Where’s the data?
            You know, from the 47 hard disks that were smuggled out of the CIA. I guess Mr Montgomery has a huge anal cavity in order to pull that one off, eh?
            Well, we’re waiting for the data of the 47 hard disks. I wonder when we’ll get it?
            My bet, is never.

          • Hey Karen, it’s been a MONTH now, where’s the data from these 47 hard disks?
            Color me surprised about it not yet showing up. Guess I’m wrong about this being absolute BS and Dennis Montgomery being a plant. We have over 35,000 emails from Clinton’s servers, not a single prosecution, nothing happening. The entire government is corrupt to the core, and nothing will be done.
            Montgomery was created to distract you from what we already know, but aren’t talking about. We’re just talking about this distraction.

          • Hahaha. Let me give you my email address where you can contact me “once a week.” combatvet2008@gmail.com … As to your C-word comment … I’m sure Hillary Clinton’s speech on mysogyny against girls and women would make yo’ mamma vey proud:
            Now, to your questions:
            1. The data from the 47 hard-drives are in possession of three parties:
            A) The FBI — Klayman turned them over to FBI Special Agents Walter Giardina and William Barnett, and FBI’s legal counsel James Baker, two years ago & they did nothing.
            B) The other two parties are Klayman and Montgomery.
            C) The other parties who viewed and/or were made aware of the hard-drives are the two U.S. District Court judges, Devin Nunes and the entire Intel Committee, including Rep. Adam Schiff. (The judges viewed it & the Committee was only informed of it.)
            As to why the FBI and Committe are refusing to release the data is something, you will have to “ask them.”
            Why are you asking me?
            2. Will something be done? I agree it may not.
            3. Is Montgomery a distraction? HAHAHAHA !! Well, the FBI sure seemed to think so — right ?? Let’s ask Special Agents Giardina and Bennett why Comey didn’t allow them to pursue it.
            I also think it’s somewhat unhinged that you ignore the two U.S. District Court judges who agreed with Klaymand and Montgomery (after they VIEWED the data) — that millions of Americans were spied upon, without a FISA warrant. (The first FISA was not obtained until June, 2016 against Carter Page.)
            QUOTE FROM ABOVE:
            “After Montgomery was turned away as a whistleblower, he came to me at Freedom Watch. With the aid of the Honorable Royce C. Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, who I had come to respect and trust over the years of my public interest advocacy, we brought Montgomery forward to FBI Director James Comey, through his General Counsel James Baker. Under grants of immunity, which I obtained through Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis, Montgomery produced the hard drives and later was interviewed under oath in a secure room at the FBI Field Office in the District of Columbia. There he laid out how persons like then-businessman Donald Trump were illegally spied upon by Clapper, Brennan, and the spy agencies of the Obama administration.”
            And of course, Snowden said the exact same thing. Who’s the man now ?????

          • Hahaha. Let me give you my email address where you can contact me “once
            a week.” combatvet2008@gmail.com … As to your C-word comment …

            C-word? Here, I’ll be very nice and direct: You’re a stupid fucking cunt that thinks it’s entirely acceptable to be rude to somebody who was absolutely correct, about what I stated 4 weeks ago.
            What in particular makes you stupid, is instead of admitting you were wrong and moving on, you persist in being wrong.
            And why would I use an email? I don’t trust you, certainly not your crap judgment. 4 weeks into this, where’s the data from 47 hard disks, from a man that has already been convicted of fraud? Part of his settlement with the government is to spread disinformation.
            There’s already plenty of evidence to prosecute and convict Hillary Clinton. If that’s not being acted upon, why would you expect supposed information from a convicted fraudster to be acted upon? Tell me, stupid “c-word”.

          • What’s wrong tootsie? Scared of debate? Want to pepper-spray me or “burn my limousine”?

          • What’s wrong tootsie? Scared of debate?

            What debate? It’s my contention that these supposed 47 hard disks don’t exist, and the entire story is false. Where is the data from the 47 hard disks?

            Want to pepper-spray me or “burn my limousine”?

            ???
            I’m just here to run your arrogant head into your own manure.
            I told you that the data on 47 hard disks would never show up, because they don’t exist. There’s no debate here. I’m just going to continually remind you when they don’t show up.
            There’s 40,000 emails of Clinton which shows CLEAR violations of the law. In those emails accepting BRIBES through the Clinton Foundation was openly discussed, discussing how ISIS was being funded (Saudi Arabia and Qatar) was openly discussed. Stealing the primary from Bernie Sanders was openly discussed.
            Why is nobody discussing those MAJOR federal crimes? I know why, because you IDIOTS believe ANYTHING you read so you’re talking about 47 hard disks that were somehow smuggled out of a high security area, without anybody noticing, because you’re a gullible idiot. This story is crap, and you have crap for brains to believe it.

          • Good question is: HOW did Dennis Montgomery ‘smuggle’ out 47 hard drives?? And 600,000,000 pages = 1.2 MILLION reams of paper @ 5 lbs/ream = 6 MILLION pounds divided by 2,000 lbs/ton = 3 thousand TONS.

          • No, my dear — the 600 million docs are actually on the hard drives. I’m sure Montgomery printed only an incrimminating few — such as those pertaining to the 156 circuit court judges, one Sup. court judge, Donald Trump, the senators and other prominent business CEOs.
            So an even better question is — “what legal reason” — did the Bush / Obama administrations have spying on them? If the try to say, “They were talking to Russians and terrorists. It was all incidental.” But that’s not gonna work in the case of the judges and certainly not the other 20 million citizens trapped on the those hard drives (unless those citizens had terror ties — and I accept that).
            But even more damning — Comey lied before Congress when he said he knows of no surveillance against Trump. And yet, Circa.com published a copy of the hand-written “FBI Intake Form” signed by the Dept. of Justice in 2015, listing the hard drives — proving Montgomery gave them to the FBI and DOJ.
            Comey should be going up on perjury charges, but this could be down-sized to … “a matter.”

          • SEE MY NEW POST AT THE VERY TOP.

            Doesn’t answer my question.
            It’s been a MONTH now, where the data from the 47 hard disks, which I told you a month ago, don’t exist? This story is a lie.

          • Contact Larry Klayman at his website for why hey haven’t been released yet. About the Wikileaks emails … You didn’t see the Washington Post article acknowlledging the Wikileaks downloads were authentic? Or the statement by Microsoft saying the same thing? (Hey, are you sure you’re OK? It seems like you’re gonna have a heart attack.)

          • You didn’t see the Washington Post article acknowlledging the Wikileaks downloads were authentic?

            First of all, this isn’t Wikileaks – if it was, they would be available.
            Second of all, I wouldn’t wipe my DOG’S ass with the Washington Post. That paper is more full of shit, than shit is.

          • Your multiple heart attacks per minute prevent you from keeping up with your own posts.
            In the pior post you mentioned the Clinton emails, which includes the John Podesta emails — which were “authenticated” by the WashPost (an in-your-face Trump hater, and yet even they said the Wikileaks were real, as did Microsoft).
            So here’s the point you missed — “GULLIBLE” only applies to those who believe things where facts don’t exist. So that covers your Clinton email comment.
            In regards to the Montgomery hard-drives, you are clawing, scratching, screaming and frothing at the mouth to IGNORE the “fact” that two circuit court judges ruled in Montgomery’s favor after they …. wait for it …. here it comes …. SAW THE DATA.
            Hahahahaha. So … yeah … it does exist.
            As to why it hasn’t been released … Contact Attorney Larry Klayman. His email is listed on his website.

          • Your multiple heart attacks per minute prevent you from keeping up with your own posts.In the pior post you mentioned the Clinton emails, which includes the John Podesta emails — which were “authenticated” by the WashPost

            I can authenticate them. I’m an electrical engineer in Silicon Valley. I can tell by the headers they are authentic. It’s possible to forge them, but it requires a lot of effort of a state intelligence agency.
            I don’t give a fuck what the Washington Post says.
            Again, where is the data from the 47 hard disks? Been a month. I’m telling you, they don’t exist. This is a bullshit story but wait and see, you’ll be waiting forever – as you don’t discus the ACTUAL leaks that are already out there, because you’re a stupid cunt. This story about the 47 hard disks is designed to distract you and here you are, being distract, like a stupid cunt.

          • Asked and answered. (Keep handy Bayer aspirin) “>)

            All you did was tell me to look somewhere else for some BS explanation.
            Where is the data from the 47 hard disks? The way you answer it is say:
            “The data from the 47 hard disks is located at ”
            A month later, I can ask you the same question, or a year later. They’re not going to turn up, because they don’t exist. This is misinformation stupid cunt, and in time, you will realize it was.

          • Hello there. The hard drives may never never be available because they are … CLASSIFIED … remember? Further, Montgomery filed a law suit against Comey earlier this week. It,s ON!

          • Hello there. The hard drives may never never be available because they are … CLASSIFIED … remember? Further, Montgomery filed a law suit against Comey earlier this week. It,s ON!

            See you in another month, when again, nothing comes of this.
            I hope I’m wrong and that Montgomery isn’t a fraud, an intentional distraction, created to waste resources – but I don’t think I am.
            Doesn’t matter if the data is classified or not, we own this fucking government. We own the data, Snowden and Assange realize this.
            You see, the strategy of the criminals that control our government is to classify everything, therefore, nothing can be seen. At the same time they tell us, if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about. Well, they have something to hide, which is why everything is classified. We don’t have a government that rules us, we have a mafia.

          • Well, apparently Montgomery is serious like a heart attack because last Monday he filed suit against James Comey — not even the FBI — but Comey alone. Here’s the article below — by Circa News. Circa is the news agency that just broke the story about the FISA court two weeks ago. The FISA court laid a judgment against the FBI / NSA / CIA also for illegal spying. So here is the article on Montgomery’s case — Click on all the “Read” links to see letters from the DOJ back in 2015 “acknowledging” that Montgomery came forward — and yet they didn’t do a damn thing —
            http://circa.com/politics/accountability/james-comey-sued-by-intelligence-contractor-dennis-montgomery-over-spying-on-americans

      • Not so fast phlipper. Read my new post up at the very top. It contains highlights from a NY Times article with my own questions that the NYT failed to answer … of course.

  3. comey and brennan like getting butt fucked by glory hole queen clinton and faggot muslim obama——their favorite hangout i hear is BOHEMIAN GROVE———————with and appetizer with SCULL and BONES PEDOPHILES

  4. Whistleblowing may be hazardous to your health both physically and occupationally. They pay lip service to it, but try it and you are toast. Such is life under a coup government.

  5. My group wrote “threat emails” to Nunes, Schiff and Goodlatte, that if the Montgomery case is not brought to the forefront of mainstream media, we’re going to stage a press conference of our own at the Los Angeles courthouse steps. So far we received no response. Anyone interested in joining us, or having experience in press conferences, contact me at … combatvet2008@gmail.com
    Comey LIED !! bold-faced.

  6. Dennis Montgomery – After reading about his past, I am a bit disturbed. He has conned a lot of people, including our government, with his fraudulent software and other things. I have no doubt Trump and his team were eavesdropped on by the Obama administration but aligning with fraudulent grandstanders such as Montgomery can never be a good thing. More to come.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_L._Montgomery

    • Don’t forget that the government can smear anyone they want. plant anything they want and create false evidence any time they want. Just because Montgomery is accused of this ‘n that does not make it true when this is our so-called government we’re talking about.

  7. MANY ARE ACCUSING DENNIS MONTGOMERY OF BEING A CON ARTIST. OK, LET’S TAKE A LOOK …
    FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/20/us/politics/20data.html
    A CASE STUDY: HOW DENNIS MONTGOMERY GOT CRUCIFIED BY THE GOVERNMENT:
    Montgomery’s former lawyer Michael J. Flynn called him a “con artist”. Really? How much was Flynn paid to say that? It’s a violation of the attorney-client privilege and immediate cause for him to be disbarred.
    Further, 120 other contractors are currently being sued by the govt., for Iraq-war related “contractor fraud.”
    It seems the govt. doesn’t like its own “contractors” — and yet paid them $285 Million for their software — which means Montgomery is not the only being crucified.
    In 2006, co–workers of Montgomery told the FBI he … “repeatedly changed the results of his software” … and yet 3 years later in 2009, the Air Force paid him another $3 Million for his software! Gee, his software must’ve been doing something right.
    In 2003, Montgomery’s software decoded messages on Al Jazeera’s news-crawler (the ticker tape at the bottom of the screen) which identified a plot to blow up French and British passenger jets, mid-air.
    The CIA took one look at the data and “agreed.” They told W. Bush — and all the planes were told to land that hour. No planes blew up and no lives were lost.
    But … THE FRENCH … didn’t like their plane having to land … so they ran their own “INVESTIGATION” … and concluded Montgomery’s software was bogus.
    Really ?? So did the French write the software? Did Montgomery “give” the software to the French for inspection ?? No and No. So how would the French know his software was bogus?
    Because the planes had to land, the incident caused sufficient embarrassment to Bush & the CIA. Suddenly, Montgomery was a con artist, because … “The French” … said so.
    But CIA senior officials, Donald Kerr and George Tenet, who oversaw Montgomery’s software were suddenly … PROMOTED … shortly thereafter!
    Seems the threat was real and Montgomery might have saved the day, but what else happened ??
    The article goes on to say that Montgomery became extremely exposed to other CIA operations during that time — to the extent, he had now become a threat. [paraphrased.]
    And they were right. Montgomery learned they were spying on millions of Americans — later confirmed by Edward Snowden. Seems Montgomery is not such a con artist after all.
    Further, the FBI swarmed Flynn’s home (he was Montgomery’s lawyer) and “BLEACHED” every email and every mention of Montgomery’s software from all of Flynn’s devices.
    HAHAHA. Gee, that must have been very powerful software!
    In fact, the fraud lawsuit against Montgomery could not continue because his software software was “too sensitive” and the judge in the case agreed! Two Men in Black showed up at the trial and refused to give the court their names.
    So again … If his software was such a con, why did the case have to be stopped for fear of exposure to the public?
    The last time the govt. used his software concerned a bomb plot by the Somalis in 2009. And it never happened. But that doesn’t mean the military didn’t take “secret” action based on Montgomery’s data — and never gave him the credit.
    Questions: If Montgomery was such a fraud … Why did the govt. pay him for services from 2003 to 2009? Why did the two CIA officials get instantly promoted after the French / British incident?
    It seems the govt. is more suspect here than Montgomery and is doing all it can to stop the release of what Montgomery found at the CIA.
    So, this is how the government can crucify anyone who “knows too much” … and embarrasses them in front of … “The French.”

  8. ATTENTION ALL THOSE WHO THINK DENNIS MONTGOMERY IS A CON ARTIST:
    HERE’S AN ARTICLE FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES — INCLUDING MY POINTS WHICH THEY CONVENIENTLY FAILED TO INCLUDE: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/20/us/politics/20data.html
    CASE STUDY: HOW DENNIS MONTGOMERY WAS UNLAWFULLY CRUCIFIED BY THE GOVERNMENT:
    Montgomery’s former lawyer Michael J. Flynn called him a “con artist”.
    Really? How much was Flynn paid to say that? It’s a violation of the attorney-client privilege and immediate cause for him to be disbarred.
    Further, 120 other contractors are currently being sued by the govt., for Iraq-war related “contractor fraud.”
    It seems the govt. doesn’t like its own “contractors” — and yet paid them $285 Million for their software — which means Montgomery is not the only being crucified.
    In 2006, co–workers of Montgomery told the FBI he … “repeatedly changed the results of his software” … and yet 3 years later in 2009, the Air Force paid him another $3 Million for his software!
    Gee, his software must’ve been doing something right.
    In 2003, Montgomery’s software decoded messages on Al Jazeera’s news-crawler (the ticker tape at the bottom of the screen) which identified a plot to blow up French and British passenger jets, mid-air.
    The CIA took one look at the data and “agreed.” They told W. Bush — and all British and French planes were told to land that hour. No planes blew up and no lives were lost.
    But … THE FRENCH … didn’t like their plane having to land. It was too costly. So they ran their own “INVESTIGATION” and concluded Montgomery’s software was bogus.
    Really ?? So did the French write the software? Did Montgomery “give” the software to the French for inspection ?? No and No. So how would the French know his software was bogus?
    Because the planes had to land, the incident caused sufficient embarrassment to Bush & the CIA. Suddenly, Montgomery was labelled con artist, because … “The French” … said so.
    But CIA senior officials, Donald Kerr and George Tenet, worked closely with Montgomery and oversaw the whole operation. While Montgomery got crucified Kerr and Tenet were suddenly … PROMOTED … shortly thereafter!
    So why did “Kerr and Tenet” get promotions? Seems like they saved the day. But what happened to Montgomery?
    The article goes on to say that Montgomery became extremely exposed to other CIA operations during that time — to the extent, he had now become a threat. [paraphrased.]
    And they were right. During his time with the CIA, Montgomery learned they were spying on millions of Americans — later confirmed by Edward Snowden.
    Seems Montgomery is not such a con artist after all.
    Further, the FBI swarmed Flynn’s home (he was Montgomery’s lawyer) and “BLEACHED” every email and every mention of Montgomery’s software from all of Flynn’s devices.
    HAHAHA. Gee, that must have been very powerful software.
    In fact, the fraud lawsuit against Montgomery could not continue because his software software was “too sensitive” and the judge in the case agreed! Two Men in Black showed up at the trial and refused to give the court their names.
    The last time the govt. used Montgomery’s software concerned a bomb plot by the Somalis in 2009. And it never happened. But that doesn’t mean the military didn’t take action based on Montgomery’s data.
    Question: If Montgomery was such a fraud … Why did the govt. pay him for services from 2003 to 2009? Why did the two CIA officials get instantly promoted after the French / British incident? And why did the FBI raid Flynn’s house and bleach all his emails mentioning the software?
    It seems the govt. is more suspect here than Montgomery and is doing all it can to stop the release of what Montgomery found at the CIA. And that is why Congress refuses to acknowledge the hard-drives — even though they prove Trump was wire-tapped and surveilled years before the election.
    This is how the government can crucify anyone who “knows too much” … and embarrasses them in front of … “The French.”

    • Where’s the data from the 47 hard disks?
      Ever consider the guy is now a disinformation agent? There’s plenty on wikileaks to convict Hillary Clinton and people within the DNC. Why should anybody give a crap about some 47 hard disks that may or may not exist?

      • OK, so in another post you asked for “the site” so you can look at the data. Right? But they cannot be published because they’re too classified. That’s why only the judges could look at them. Klayman said he also could not see them because he has no clearance. But the judges saw it. The list of those surveilled since “2004” are — 156 court circuit judges, Trump, the Senate, other prominent business people and a Supreme Court Judge — all illegally, with no FISA. **

        • OK, so in another post you asked for “the site” so you can look at the data. Right? But they cannot be published because they’re too classified.

          Oh BULLSHIT.
          I have years of Clinton’s state department emails available to me to peruse.
          The 47 hard disks can’t be published, because they simply don’t exist.

          • It seems you “still” don’t know what’s going on here. The Clinton emails were personal communication from within the DNC and the Clinton office. Other Clinton emails were released to Judicial Watch & the American Center for Law & Justice — through FOIAs (requests for public information.)
            The data on Montgomery’s hard drives comes from … THE CIA … a whole other animal. Says a lot about your cognitive skills and your ability to “reason” … which separates us from the animals.

          • It seems you “still” don’t know what’s going on here.

            I know the data will never be released from the 47 supposed hard disks, which apparently were smuggled out of high security. That was quite a feat, understanding how hard it is to smuggle out a keychain.
            Let’s take the assumption this BULLSHIT does exist. Without releasing it to the public, it will never be investigated. The government is a mafia, and the mafia doesn’t investigate itself.
            Whistleblowers become enemies of the state, and either end up in prison like Manning did, or exiles, like Snowden did. Surely even a stupid cunt like you knows that?
            So until they are released, and they never will be because they don’t exist, who gives a shit? You already have 35,000 emails showing the DNC acting criminally. What’s the action being done?
            You twats instead concentrate on these supposed disks and it will go nowhere, because that’s what this bullshit story is designed to do. It’s an obvious dead end.

            The data on Montgomery’s hard drives come from … THE CIA… a whole other animal.

            Where do you think Vault 7 came from? A monkey’s asshole?

          • Agreed. Agreed. Agreed. Except for two points:
            1. We are not twats. (Twats are the women with hairy arm-pits and Pink P*sy hats marching on DC in January.)
            2. Just because the Gov wants to bury the existence of the 47 drives, doesn’t mean we should stop stomping our feet.
            About Vault 7 …. also agreed. Stupid CIA “twats.” hahahaha.

          • Richardwicks doesn’t believe the hard drives exist,I don’t believe he exists either. No credible person would hurl such nastiness towards a woman.

          • Haha. Don’t worry, I can handle it. I pick fights with liberals all the time. “>)

            Oh, isn’t that cute? You think because I think this asshole is full of shit and I don’t believe in him, I must be a liberal.
            Where’s the contents of the 47 hard disks?
            You, stupid cunt, you might be able to be taken for a ride, but I’m not so easy. Dennis Montgomery is full of shit. There’s a ton of evidence from Wikileaks to take down Hillary Clinton – why don’t you idiots concentrate on that? She was OPENLY ACCEPTING BRIBES – “pay-for-play” was openly discussed on the Podesta emails. Open and shut case if you idiots would pursue it. What not go for the obvious kill, canard?
            Of course all your “work” is focused on this dumb shit Dennis Montgomery, who is full of shit. Let’s all pretend you assholes are doing an “investigation” and not a distraction.
            But it’s pretense – isn’t it, you fucking scumbag? Why aren’t you following the obvious evidence. You can’t be this much of a stupid cunt, you’re a shill. You’re a plant.

          • Hey Karen, where’s the data from those 47 hard disks?
            Guess Dennis Montgomery doesn’t know how to wire up a hard disk. I can do it, does he need some help?
            Call me!!

      • Well, Clintonians don’t care about the drives — but 63 million of us do. Why? Because they prove Trump got surveilled (wiretapped) since 2004, as were 156 judges, a Sup. Court judge and other prominent biz people.

  9. FOUND IT! it’s not 47 hard drives AND 600 Million pages. Here is the actual quote, “47 hard drives with DATA amounting to more than 600 million pages of documentation” per Attorney Klayman. Still 47 h.d. would be hard to move out of your office!!

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.