Why did emerging market equities outperform in the 2000s, and why did US equities outperform after 2009?

Sharing is Caring!

i.imgur.com/trYzI90.png

Above is a quick chart of the returns of $SPY, $EEM, and $EFA, using Portfolio Visualizer. It’s just mind-boggling that the equity prices of the emerging markets could shoot thru the roof in the 2000s while that of the US moved up little, while nowadays the US equity is taking off and leaving that of emerging markets behind.

READ  Why “Trouble is Brewing” for the U.S. Housing Market | Elliott Wave International

 

Emerging markets are “higher risk higher reward”. The magnitude of the emerging markets’ swings is far larger than what you see in the developed markets. The intuitive logic is this: there is a lot more room for efficiency improvements in those economies and they have the potential for explosive growth, but the governments are also less established and it’s more likely for political corruption and other turmoil to impede growth.

READ  Market Hits All-Time Highs As Money Flows Peak

All of this means that they’re more likely to shoot to the moon and also more likely to crash back down to earth than the developed markets.

 

h/t FFN

470 views

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.