Well, desperation seems to be creeping in for the supply of children and funding for pedophiles from the actions of Donald Trump. What’s happening and not being reported by the mainstream news, is Trump is stopping the open flow river of U.S. tax dollars leaving America for the purpose of non-Americans and that don’t benefit the country at all. Trump stopped the federal funding that U.S. taxpayers were spending for non-Americans to have abortions outside of the U.S. When that happened, the Melinda Gates pledged $375 million from the Gates Foundation to keep the doors to abort open. (Google Planned Parenthood Selling Baby Parts) Just like some of us like veal, and lamb, there are those who do indeed enjoy young babies. Supply, demand, profits!
Then Trump moved to the US/Mexican border to have a look around at what the Obama/Clinton administration had been spending the millions of tax dollars on immigration and children without parents on the border. The results of that investigation, were and still showing that children were being brought across U.S. borders by people who weren’t their parents. What Americans have yet to see in the mainstream news, are the facilities that house the children under three.
Where are the babies from the border???
Are they part of the DACA program that Trump wants to shut down along will millions of tax dollars that are putting immigrant children in front of American children? What does anyone really know of the money to date spent in the DACA program? Well, a deep state judge just denied and revoked president Trump’s administration from shutting down the funding for what many are calling the babies for elite pedophile program.
A federal judge ruled Friday that the Trump administration must restart, in full, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. DACA is an Obama era program that President Donald Trump rescinded. The Trump administration last year announced that it planned to phase out the program. As reported by The Hill, In his 25-page opinion, Judge John Bates said the Trump White House had again failed to provide justification for its proposal to end the Obama-era program, under which nearly 800,000 people brought to the country illegally as children, known as:
What is DACA – Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals?
DACA, was announced by President Barack Obama on June 15, 2012. In November 2014, Obama announced his intention to expand DACA to cover additional illegal aliens. Although multiple states immediately sued to prevent the expansion, their attempt was ultimately blocked by the deep state courts for elite pedophiles? The date was chosen as the 30th anniversary of Plyler v. Doe, a Supreme Court decision barring public schools from charging illegal immigrant children tuition. The policy was officially established by a memorandum from the Secretary of Homeland Security titled “Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children”. (Forgetting all the American children living in homeless shelters and camps?)
Why aren’t the homeless children of America spoken about or cared for? They will be, when someone can figure out a program that money can be laundered through and a government contract can be had. How long will Americans have to wait for the “AUDITS” of all the programs they spend millions on? How much money has already been wasted and laundered by the Obama/Clinton administration? There are judges and pedophiles that are doing their best to keep that out of the hands of honor and integrity…transparency not wanted?
Republican Party leaders denounced the DACA program as an abuse of executive power.
Nearly all Republicans in the House of Representatives (along with three Democrats) voted 224–201 to defund DACA in June 2013. However, in practice Congress does not have the ability to defund DACA since the program is almost entirely funded by its own application fees rather than congressional appropriations.????? (Where is the money coming from????)
To apply for DACA, eligible individuals must pay a $495 application fee, submit several forms, and produce documents showing they meet the requirements. They do not need legal representation. In August 2012, the Migration Policy Institute estimated that as many as 1.76 million people could be eligible for DACA. (A lot of money when you add it all up. Is anyone accountable for it?) USCIS released the process for DACA renewals in June 2014 and directed applicants to file their documents during a 30-day window starting 150 days before the expiration of their previous DACA status. Renewing requires an additional $495 fee.
As of June 2016, there had been 606,264 renewal cases, with 526,288 approved, 4,703 denied and 75,205 renewals pending.
December 2014, Texas and 25 other states, all with Republican governors, sued in the District Court for the Southern District of Texas asking the court to enjoin implementation of both the DACA expansion and Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (a similar program) February 2015, Judge Andrew S. Hanen issued a preliminary injunction blocking the expansion from going into effect while the case, Texas v. United States, proceeded.
When the Obama administration appealed to the (Now Dead) Supreme Court, Justice Antonin Scalia’s untimely death left an 8 justice court, which then ruled equally divided (4–4) for and against the injunction. Procedural rules of the Court in the case of a tie would mean that no opinion would be written, no precedent would be set by the Supreme Court in the case, and that the appellate court’s ruling would stand. Almost all economists reject Jeff Sessions’ claim that DACA “denied jobs to hundreds of thousands of Americans by allowing those same jobs to go to illegal aliens.” Sessions’ claim is rooted in what economists call the “lump of labor fallacy” (i.e., the idea that there is a limit to amount of work force available in any economy).
Obama for immigrants first, DACA also increased the income of illegal immigrants in the bottom of the income distribution.The study estimates that DACA moved 50,000 to 75,000 unauthorized immigrants into employment. According to one survey, 91 percent of DACA registrants are employed, and 5 percent have launched their own businesses, compared to 3.1 percent of all Americans.
In the all about the money nation, the Immigrant Legal Resource Center estimated that deporting DACA-eligible individuals would reduce Social Security and Medicare tax revenue by $24.6 billion over a decade. A 2017 study by the Center for American Progress estimated that the loss of all DACA-eligible workers would reduce U.S. GDP by $433 billion over the next 10 years. 21 percent of DACA-protected immigrants work in education and health services.
PAY-TO-PLAY OBAMA/CLINTON IMMIGRATION FOR A NEW WORLD ORDER
OBAMA PROMISE TO THE IMMIGRANT OVER AMERICAN PROGRAM:
Many DACA recipients believe safety to be a prominent issue since the repeal of the act. In another journal by US Official News, it is revealed that “almost 800,000 youth trusted the government with their “fingerprints” and other personal information when they applied for DACA. In return, the two-year reprieve from deportation lifted the constant, everyday fear of existence that characterized their lives. These mental health gains, in addition to the fruits of all of their hard work over the past five years, are now threatened.”
Conversely, Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice, opined that DACA was unlawful by asserting that it unconstitutionally usurped Congress’ role over immigration by illegally allowing certain classes of illegal aliens to violate U.S. immigration law with impunity.
To assist those eligible under the program, the state of California has agreed to support those who receive a DACA grant by allowing access to a state driver’s license
Mayor of Chicago Rahm Emanuel stated that he wants to make Chicago the “most immigrant-friendly city in the country”.
Iowa – FORCED?
In 2012, the then-director of the Iowa Department of Transportation, Paul Trombino III (now nominee for Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration), announced a policy to deny driver’s licenses to Iowa residents who were part of the DACA program. The policy was reversed several weeks later.
In 2016, Mayor of Baltimore (2010-2016) Stephanie Rawlings-Blake stated that Baltimore police would not check the citizenship status of people with whom they interact. (Criminals welcome?)
USCIS has made it clear that DACA beneficiaries do not possess legal status, but does not state that DACA beneficiaries are unlawfully present; in fact, it states that DACA beneficiaries will not accrue unlawful presence time here while they are in this deferred action status.
Michigan – FORCED?
In October 2012, the Michigan Secretary of State, Ruth Johnson, announced that Michigan would not issue driver’s licenses or state identification of any kind to beneficiaries of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. On February 1, 2013, Johnson reversed her policy and began issuing driver’s licenses to DACA beneficiaries on February 19, 2013.
Nebraska – FORCED?
Governor Dave Heineman opposed Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals and in 2012 directed the Nebraska Department of Motor Vehicles to not issue driver’s licenses to people who received deferred action under DACA. In 2015, however, the Nebraska Legislature determined that Section 202©(B)(viii) of the REAL ID Act of 2015 required states to allow people to present documentation of deferred-action status when registering for a driver’s license, and the Nebraska Legislature voted to change state law to allow qualified individuals with DACA to receive licenses by using documentation of their status of deferred action.
North Carolina – FORCED?
North Carolina briefly suspended giving driver’s licenses to DACA grantees while awaiting the state attorney general’s opinion.
Although in-state tuition was still offered, Governor Rick Perry announced his opposition to DACA by distributing a letter to all state agencies, meant “to ensure that all Texas agencies understand that Secretary Napolitano’s guidelines confer absolutely no legal status whatsoever to any illegal immigrant who qualifies for the federal ‘deferred action’ designation.”
DACA students were eligible for in-state tuition. The attorney general advised that under Virginia law, DACA students who met Virginia’s domicile requirements were eligible for in-state tuition.
While running for president, Donald Trump declared he intended to repeal DACA on “day one” of his presidency. And now the battle is one between the left and the right, the dark and the light, the good and the evil. What is good for the American people? From the history of the Obama/Clinton administration, immigrants are first and Americans are being removed to make room for immigrants. How do you change a nation? Remove all its residents! (History of Cuba???)
President Trump said that “virtually all” “top legal experts” believed that DACA was unconstitutional. Republicans, including Senators John McCain and Jeff Flake, and Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, condemned the Trump Administration’s choice to rescind the executive order.
In a released statement Senator McCain said:
I strongly believe that children who were illegally brought into this country through no fault of their own should not be forced to return to a country they do not know. The 800,000 innocent young people granted deferred action under DACA over the last several years are pursuing degrees, starting careers, and contributing to our communities in important ways.
Pedophile protector Pope Francis said if Trump is truly pro-life, “he will understand that the family is the cradle of life and that it must be defended as a unit.” (Babies needed for sacrifice?) Ralph Reed, chairman of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, endorsed Trump’s repeal.
Janet Napolitano, president of the UC system, called the rescission of DACA, “unconstitutional, unjust, and unlawful”. In a released statement Napolitano said:
I am deeply troubled by President Trump’s decision to effectively end the DACA program and uproot the lives of an estimated 800,000 Dreamers across the nation.
On December 20, 2017, the (deep state) Supreme Court remanded five DACA cases originally filed in the Northern District of California back to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. This action stops the district court’s order to deliver documents to the plaintiffs. On January 9, 2018, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California temporarily blocked the rescission of the DACA program, ordering the government to renew DACA until further order of the court.
KEEP THEM ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT DOLLARS!- On February 13, 2018, Judge Nicholas Garaufis of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted a preliminary injunction ordering the federal government to fully restore the DACA program, including accepting brand new applicants as well as renewals. On February 26, 2018, the Supreme Court declined to hear the Trump administration’s request for it to review the lower court order that the administration must continue to accept DACA applications, so the Supreme Court will allow the Ninth Circuit to review the ruling.
On April 24, 2018, John D. Bates, a Senior United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, ruled that the Trump administration must resume accepting new applications for DACA.
On May 1, 2018, a coalition of 7 States, led by Texas, filed a lawsuit challenging the Constitutionality of the program.
Who is the deep state Judge John Bates whose actions show anti-Trump for transparency, truth, and draining the swamp of place where Americans are losing billions of dollars for non-American?
Deep state go to man, John Bates is the judge that can be counted on to protect and serve some and not all? Appointed by President George W. Bush in December 2001, and has adjudicated several cases directly affecting the office of the President. Bates served as Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, from July 1, 2013 to January 5, 2015, after which he returned to full-time service as a District Judge. Bates took senior status on October 12, 2014.
IF JOHN CAN’T FIX IT, NO BODY CAN???
AS OBAMA HAS SAID: “The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth, are people with something to hide. Covering up the truth is a full time job and it takes thousands to keep lies from coming to the surface. Our actions will continue to define our characters and our legacy in the world. John Bates is leaving his and it would seem that it isn’t very favorable of the people? Was judge Bates a regular visitor to the ranch where Scalia died?
American judges, should have limited terms and be voted in by the people. Look what has become of the judicial system by friends being placed in positions of power and trust, who are conflicted on making the right choices. No convictions of those at the very top, because there is a judge somewhere to count on that corruption knows will say “STOP” the truth?
Bates was on detail as Deputy Independent Counsel for the Whitewater investigation from 1995 to mid-1997. From September 1995 until leaving in March 1997, Bates worked as Deputy Independent Counsel for Kenneth Starr and the Independent Counsel’s office during the investigation into President Bill Clinton. In February 2006, he was appointed by Chief Justice John Roberts to serve as a judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA Court).
On August 3, 2018 Bates ruled that ” the Trump administration did not justify its decision to eliminate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. On April 24, 2018, Judge Bates ruled that the Trump administration must resume accepting new applications for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
On February 8, 2017, Judge Bates blocked the $54 billion merger between health insurance companies Anthem and Cigna
On October 25, 2016, Judge Bates dismissed freed Guantanamo Bay detention camp prisoner Shawali Khan’s petition for habeas corpus as moot.
On March 19, 2014, Judge Bates in Innovator Enterprises, Inc v Jones found for the plaintiff and vacated BATFE’s classification of the company’s “stabilizer break” as a “firearm silencer”.
In November 2013, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence declassified and released a circa-July 2010 (date classified) FISC ruling by Judge Bates authorizing the National Security Agency to restart mass collection of internet metadata, including those of U.S. citizens.
On December 10, 2010, Bates dismissed a challenge to President Barack Obama’s targeted killing order against Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, a dual American and Yemeni citizen with ties to al-Qaeda.
On July 31, 2008, Bates ruled, in a dispute between the Administrative and Legislative branches, that President George W. Bush’s advisers, chief of staff Josh Bolten and former legal counsel Harriet Miers, are not immune from congressional subpoenas to testify about the firing of nine U.S. attorneys and turn over all related, non-privileged documents.
Bates dismissed the GAO’s effort to learn with whom Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy task force conferred. Bates dismissed the GAO’s effort to learn with whom Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy task force conferred. Plame’s identity as a Central Intelligence Agency field operative was revealed in a syndicated newspaper column in 2003. (Sound like current events???)
In a December 30, 2002 decision, Bates of the U.S. District Court ruled that lead plaintiff Representative Dennis Kucinich and 31 other members of the United States House of Representatives have no standing to challenge President Bush’s withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty without congressional approval.
Related Posts:If everyone who reads our story, who likes it, helps fund it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as $10, you can support the IWB – and it only takes a minute. Thank you. 917 views