by Pamela Williams
Hillary Clinton’s fingerprints are all over this chemical attack in Idlib. When she toppled Libya, she ran a sarin gas rat line from Libya to Syria to the Syrian Rebels/ISIS. They stockpiled these chemical weapons in rock embankments.
In 2014 President Obama conceded that Assad destroyed all of Syria’s chemical stockpiles under the supervision of UN inspectors and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). The Americans even paid for the process of destroying these weapons.
However, it is a different story with ISIS and Al Qaeda, because there is a huge chemical lab at the University of Mosul. Those who served under Saddam Hussein developed these weapons. Of course, we know that Mosul fell under the control of ISIS.
Now please understand this, this chemical attack has come at a time when the rebels/Al Qaeda/ISIS in Syria are struggling to maintain their hold on various land in Syria. We all know that as of late ISIS has been downgraded by much of what President Trump has done. With defeats overcoming ISIS, lo and behold – BOOM – suddenly a chemical attack out of nowhere.
Who could benefit from this? Not Assad, as he is beginning to do well and gain respect from many in the world. I respect him, and I think he is trying to pull his Country together. I think Russia is right, and they know Assad had no reason to do this horrible chemical attack.
This is what British security analyst and counterterrorism expert, Charles Shoebridge told RT on this matter:
“The people who have benefited from this kind of attack are the rebels themselves because they have gained a major political advantage at a time when they are struggling both strategically and geopolitically,” he said, adding that Damascus-led forces would have hardly opted for such tactics since they are on a roll “across Syria.”
The analyst also pointed out that such incidents fall into a certain pattern “taking place at critical moments from a geopolitical perspective.” He mentioned that a chlorine attack took place in Ghouta, a Damascus suburb, in August 2013 at the time when UN inspectors arrived in the Syrian capital. Another chemical attack took place in September 2016 shortly before “a major conference in London, where the Syrian opposition met with its foreign donors.”
HOW DOES THIS RELATE TO HILLARY CLINTON…LET ME SHOW YOU THE WAYS.
- Libya, under Gaddafi, did possess chemical weapon stockpiles.
- The US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya was operating as a rat line to Syrian moderate rebels for Gaddafi’s weapons as Clinton had helped herself to them.
- Remember Hillary’s and Obama’s “moderate rebels” and the failure of the program?
- Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh made the case that Hillary approved the sending of sarin gas to Syria.
He said this:
At a time when Clinton is trying to secure the 2016 democratic presidential nomination, Hersh is coming forward with allegations that the democratic presidential front-runner and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was a go-between the Obama Administration and the leaders of Middle Eastern nations (namely Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey) to set up a horrific sarin gas attack and place the blame on the shoulders of Assad. Why? So that the U.S. could invade Syria and blame Assad.
“By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria.”
Hersh didn’t elaborate as to whether the “arms” he referred to encompassed the chemical precursors for creating sarin gas, which Libya stockpiled. However, multiple independent reports have independently confirmed that Gaddafi of Libya did, indeed, possess such stockpiles. Additionally, the The Free Thought Project reports, the much-touted U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya was operating as a “rat line” for Gaddafi’s weaponry while Hillary Clinton was at the helm.
Finally we have the photos of the pick up trucks around the area where White Helmets claims the sarin gas attack occurred.
Were the pick up trucks there to transport people/bodies to the location in order to stage the social media evidence?
Or were the trucks there to transport the chemical weapons and stockpile them in a hidden bunker, carved into rock?
Are the chemical weapons reported in the Idlib gas attack, the weapons that were transported from Hillary’s destroyed Libya, and into the hands of Obama’s Al Qaeda “moderate rebels”?
I do want to include a video from Ron Paul, who explains all so well:
Streamed live on Apr 5, 2017
Just days after the US Administration changed course on Syrian President Assad, saying he could stay, an alleged chemical weapon attack that killed dozens of civilians has been blamed on the Syrian government. Did Assad sign his own death warrant with such an attack…or does some other entity benefit?
In conclusion, I would like to end this report with a message from Rand Paul:
This remains true today as it was in 2013. Both parts. t.co/sRQkcZ0oDI
— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) April 6, 2017
Senator Paul even phrased the terms of his argument in such a way as to appeal to the pro-Israel Trump. Paul stated that ISIS threatens Israel as well as Syria and the United States.
The claim is dubious as Israel has been trying to undermine both Hafez and Bashar al-Assad from 1970 to the present day. Nevertheless, the appeal was a clever move in order to pull on Donald Trump’s heart strings.
The march to war is as dire an issue today as it has been since 2013, but as it was then, there is still hope that anti-war voices can prevail.
I personally hope that President Trump’s formerly anti-war voice resurfaces.