by Pamela Williams
Lets start by asking who is Dr. Evelyn Farkas? Singing like a canary on MSNBC recently about urging her former colleagues to “get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can before President Obama leaves the administration”, Farkas’ role was a more covert one when she was working on the Clinton campaign, and for all we know, still is.
Yes, that is the biggie here: Evelyn Farkas is a Clinton aide. Get this: When Hillary Clinton resigned as Secretary of State in 2013, she negotiated continuing access to classified and top-secret documents for herself and six staffers under the designation “research assistants,” according to a powerful senator who notes that Clinton was later deemed “extremely careless” with such information. Hard to believe, isn’t it? Hillary was able to keep one foot in the State Department and one foot out as she was running for President. This gave Clinton secret access to “classified information” she had mishandled in the past. Did anyone care? It does not appear so. Does this mean she also had access to the surveillance information of the Trump Team? Most likely so.
Farkas, who left her position as deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russia, Ukraine, and Eurasia in the Obama White House in 2015, and who went on to join the Hillary Clinton campaign team, spoke openly about her personal knowledge of Obama national security officials rushing to preserve as much intelligence as they could before Trump took office and directed that information to Congress. So, of course, if Farkas was on Hillary’s campaign team, and she has access to the intelligence, so did Hillary.
THAT MEANS THAT DURING THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION BETWEEN CLINTON AND TRUMP, CLINTON HAD ACCESS TO SECRET SURVEILLANCE OF TRUMP AND HIS TEAM. WHY AM I NOT SURPRISED?
Why is mainstream media not reporting this? FOX NEWS AND SEAN HANNITY ARE. BELOW IS A VIDEO BY HANNITY IN THIS FARKAS MYSTERY:
Published on Mar 30, 2017
Dr Evelyn Farkas in her own word’s, claims what she said was “FAKE NEWS”. HANNITY
As Hannity says now, Evelyn Farkas is claiming the Russians did it, and her own words are “fake news.” I did you not! Now, this gets even better. We may have found the source from whence the Trump/Putin rumors originated from!
Farkas, goes back further than anybody else when it comes to linking Donald Trump with Vladimir Putin. ‘Trump and Putin: Two Liars Separated at Birth’ was the title of a piece she wrote for Politico Magazine back on April 3, 2016. Quote by Farkas: “No wonder they seem to like each other, they are akin in their abuse of the truth”.
Is this interesting or what? Many dots are starting to connect, but mainstream news media does not intend to connect them. Farkas, was linking Trump and Putin before the New York Times, came out with the sensational headline “Trump, Offering No Evidence, Says Obama Tapped His Phones.” on January 19 and 20, 2017.
“On January 19th and 20th 2017, The NY Times reported that wiretaps of people on the Trump team were passed along to the Obama White House, one of the story’s authors was Michael S. Schmidt. On Saturday that same Michael S. Schmidt was one of the reporters who wrote the story, “Trump, Offering No Evidence, Says Obama Tapped His Phones.”
“That’s right, the same NY Times reporter who was one of the sources for the President’s claim, said that there was no evidence for the claim.
“The first story by Mr. Schmidt appeared on the NY Times website the evening of January 19, 2017 and appeared on the front page of the paper the morning of Inauguration Day, January 20, 2017.” – Quoted from Andrew Benjamin— Canada Free Press, March 12, 2017
This is what Farkas wrote about Trump on Poltico on Jan. 12, 2017 before he was even inaugurated.:
“Donald Trump has been dismissing the threat posed by Russia to U.S. elections, to our democracy and even to him from the moment he entered the campaign for president. He hasn’t stopped dismissing the serious Russian intelligence and information operations against the American people, even after his election and practically on the eve of his inauguration.”
So Dr. Evelyn Farkas was working very hard behind the scenes to ignite the Trump/Putin narrative, all the while she was on the Hillary Clinton team.
This is the way Sean Hannity of FOX NEWS explained it:
“Fox News’ Sean Hannity opened Wednesday night’s edition of “Hannity” by saying that statements by a former Obama administration official “could prove the Obama administration was very much involved in the surveillance of Trump transition team members.”
“Hannity was referring to a March 2 MSNBC interview with Dr. Evelyn Farkas, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russia/Ukraine/Eurasia and now a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council.
“In the interview, Farkas admitted to “telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can [about possible connections between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence] … before President Obama leaves the administration, because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left.”
“Farkas also said she feared “that the Trump folks – if they found out how we knew what we knew about their … the Trump staff dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.”
“According to Hannity, Farkas was “admitting … surveillance of Trump and his associates and transition team took place,” as well as “unmasking” of those Trump team members and “intelligence leaking,” which, Hannity said, “could very well be a felony.”
“Surveillance. Unmasking. Intelligence leaking. All acknowledged in that tape by Evelyn Farkas,” Hannity said. “Now, for days, we have been asking on this program, ‘Who knew what, when and where?’
“Did Obama officials commit a crime here and how did Evelyn Farkas, a former relatively low-ranking Obama administration official, how did she know about all this surveillance? … My prediction is as each day goes by, more and more information will be coming available and soon, we’re going to have the answers to these very important questions.”
On Hillary Clinton’s continued access to classified materials, this is what the watchdog group, JUDICIAL WATCH had to say:
Chris Farrell, of Judicial Watch, a conservative Washington-based government watchdog group that has filed a number of lawsuits related to the Clinton email scandal, said it is “outrageous” that Clinton and her staff would have access after they left the state department, and may still have access, after such egregious behavior.
“It is so unimaginatively offensive that Hillary Clinton or her staff would have any access to classified or top secret information,” Farrell said. “It is a mindblower.
“Any other government employee, I don’t care what department or agency they are from, would have had their access to classified and top secret information revoked and their clearance suspended, pending the outcome of an investigation into the mishandling of such information,” Farrell added.
This is a video by Sean Hannity of FOX NEWS reviewing what Dr. Evelyn Farkas said on MSNBC. It must be repeated and never forgotten.
Only Twenty-two news outlets—all of them Conservative—reported on the Farkas story.
At press time, a Polish news outlet (Interia) appears as number 7 on the list and a Vietnamese one, (Báo ??u th?u) appears as the list’s number 9.
The Obama administration was spying on Donald Trump while he was still a candidate in attempts to guarantee Hillary Clinton’s presidential election victory.
If anything should tell Americans we no longer have a news media we can trust it is this story.
If not for FOX NEWS AND SEAN HANNITY who on mainstream news media would be informing the American people of one of the most important stories in the history of Presidential elections?
You have Alternative Media, but how long will Alt-Media be alive? We are being called “fake news”, and we are not that. Evelyn Farkas is calling her own words, “fake news.” I think the term “fake news” is being used too often, and too many people are confused as to what it really means.
Related Posts:If everyone who reads our story, who likes it, helps fund it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as $10, you can support the IWB – and it only takes a minute. Thank you. 3,816 views