This is a great example of how BBC propaganda works. Piers Morgan acts indignant that the RT journalist won’t acknowledge Putin’s role in assassinations. Yet, even though Piers Morgan constantly asserts this to be true, he doesn’t provide a shred of evidence or even name a single victim whom he alleges to have been killed by Putin.
It’s argument by assertion and repetition, rather than by evidence. And the RT journalist is guilty if he doesn’t accept the accusation as true without so much as a shred of proof to back it up.