Both Trump And Biden Administrations Helped Shape The Inflation Surge

by

Economic policy works with lags. A decision made under one administration can still be affecting spending, credit, production and prices after the presidency changes.

That is why assigning inflation to whoever happens to be in office when prices accelerate misses how the transmission actually works.

Trump signed the roughly $2.2 trillion CARES Act in March 2020 and another roughly $900 billion relief package in December 2020. Those programs supported household income, unemployment benefits and businesses during the shutdown.

Biden then signed the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan in March 2021 while the economy was already reopening.

These were not separate economic episodes. They were successive waves of stimulus moving through the same economy.

The Lag Crossed Administrations

The often cited 18 to 24 month lag is especially relevant to monetary policy, although it is not a fixed timer.

The Federal Reserve cut rates to near zero in March 2020 and launched enormous asset purchases. 18 to 24 months later takes you into roughly September 2021 through March 2022.

By then Trump was gone.

That does not mean every price increase in that window came from the March 2020 response. It means the effects of policy do not stop at an election.

Fiscal policy also works with variable lags.

Some stimulus is spent immediately. Some goes into savings or debt repayment and supports spending later. Even after relief programs expire, the purchasing power they helped create does not instantly disappear.

By mid 2022, Federal Reserve researchers still estimated households held roughly $1.7 trillion in excess savings accumulated during the pandemic.

Too Much Demand Met Too Little Supply

The core problem was that Washington could restore purchasing power much faster than the economy could restore productive capacity.

Consumers shifted heavily toward goods while factories, transportation networks and global supply chains were still constrained.

The first rounds of emergency support helped prevent a depression and widespread business failures. That does not mean every later dollar carried the same benefit or the same inflation risk.

Timing matters.

Emergency stimulus during a shutdown is very different from adding another $1.9 trillion while demand is already recovering and supply is still struggling to respond.

Both administrations contributed to the fiscal expansion, but not necessarily in equal ways or with equal consequences.

The Federal Reserve Was Part of It Too

The Fed kept rates near zero and continued buying Treasuries and mortgage backed securities until March 2022.

That meant extraordinary monetary support remained in place even as inflation broadened.

By February 2022, headline CPI had already reached 7.9% and inflation excluding food and energy was 6.4%.

On March 16, 2022, the Fed finally began raising rates, moving the federal funds target from 0 to 0.25% up to 0.25 to 0.50%.

The Russia Ukraine war worsened inflation through energy and food. It did not create the inflation problem from nothing.

The Political Lesson

Trump era stimulus and Fed easing continued affecting the economy after Trump left office.

Biden then added another massive fiscal package while those earlier effects were still moving through the system.

The Fed also remained accommodative too long as inflation became broader and more persistent.

And slower inflation later does not erase the earlier increase in the price level.

The real question is not who occupied the White House when inflation became visible. It is which policies were enacted, when they entered the economy, how long their effects lasted and what happened when those effects overlapped.

0 views