COLD WAR II: With or without trade war deal, disputes between China and US set to intensify, says Beijing commentator.

via scmp:

 

As part of China’s reform and opening up initiative, the state had generally retreated from the market and economy in the period from 1978 to 2008, But since then, the state has made a comeback and altered the direction of China’s economic underpinnings.

China’s political and economic elites observed the global financial crisis in 2008 and concluded that China’s model of government intervention and state-owned economy system might be superior to the Washington-led western model of free enterprise. In other words, Beijing’s confidence in the so-called China model reached its peak.

So when the US raised the issue of structural reform in the current trade talks – essentially asking China to give up the state’s grip on capital, business and technology – Beijing found it very hard to swallow.

One communist official raised a very interesting question in her blog: if the US thinks state industrial policies can help improve technology progress, why is the US not able to learn from China and do the same? If the US believes China’s model will lead to disaster and eventually lead to its collapse like the Soviet Union, why is the US unwilling to just let it happen?

This idea is popular among Beijing policymakers and academics. In other words, Beijing finds nothing wrong with its own development model. On the contrary, Beijing views the US as the one losing confidence in itself and the one that is trying to pick a fight with China.

Still, many liberal Chinese scholars and private entrepreneurs have argued for “structural reforms” for years, with many appeals similar to Washington’s demand to reduce the role of the state in the market.

This is why US President Donald Trump, to his surprise, may find a group of supporters among liberals in China – they hope the external pressure from Washington can press China to conduct long-overdue economic liberalisation.

It’s interesting that Beijing thinks that what happened in 2007-08 was due to an excess of capitalism, rather than the near-inevitable result of heavy-handed government tinkering with banking and currency, the finance markets, and home-ownership.

Which leads to this:

So when the US raised the issue of structural reform in the current trade talks – essentially asking China to give up the state’s grip on capital, business and technology – Beijing found it very hard to swallow.

I wish we’d take our own advice.

 

 

h/t SG

 

 

Related Posts:

We truly are under attack. We need user support now more than ever! For as little as $10, you can support the IWB directly – and it only takes a minute. Thank you. 574 views
Related Posts: