FBI On Runaway Path – Refusing Grassley And Nunes – Did FBI Use FAKE DOSSIER Information To Conduct Intercepts? ILLEGAL!

by Ruby Henley
The FBI has gone rogue, and at this point according to my research, the only person who can stop them is Attorney General Jeff Sessions.  This is the most serious issue facing the United States today, as if the FBI is not cooperating with the Senate Intelligence Committee, our entire Judicial System is no longer valid.  This means all laws are moot, lawmakers are moot, and any US citizen can be arrested by unlawful parties.  
We have to go to the details and facts surrounding the dossier that has been proven to be false. The point here is the FBI agreed to the terms and conditions of the creator of the dossier.  It was used by the Intelligence agencies of the United States to bring down a Presidential candidate they did not approve of.
The bottom line is this question:  Did the FBI use the dossier’s “salacious and unverified” information to make the case that the bureau should be granted the authority to conduct intercepts?  Please think about what this means.  Did the FBI or other agencies use any information from the dossier as a basis for warrant requests before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court?
Charles Grassley of the Senate Judiciary Committee has tried for months to get the FBI to answer the above question.  Nunes and Graham have supported his efforts, but they have gotten nothing.  How can this be?  It means the FBI is answering to no one and is on a path like a runaway train.  If AG Sessions does not take the bull by the horns, all of our laws will be moot.  Consider the following carefully:

  1. The parties who are responsible for the creation of the dossier are the Clinton campaign, the DNC, and the law firm Perkins Coie.
  2. The firm Fusion GP worked for the above parties.
  3. The firm Fusion GPS hired Christopher Steele to compile the Trump dossier.
  4. In October, 2016, Christopher Steele approached the FBI with alleged information.
  5. How can it be possible the Nation’s top federal law enforcement agency would even meet with such a man?  In fact, they should have arrested him knowing his background.
  6. The “Washington Post” reported Steele “reached an agreement with the FBI a few weeks before the election for the bureau to pay him to continue his work.”
  7. The FBI at that point in time acted as a blackmailer.  
  8. The Trump/Russia collusion story was born, and now it is being led by Special Counsel Mueller.  

Parties are being harassed and lives are being destroyed, and the reason for doing so involves a 100% illegal piece of paper.  The parties responsible for the creation and upkeep of that illegal piece of paper are walking free and playing with the lives of anyone they choose.  
Oh, but that is not all, the accomplices are sitting back in their armchairs watching the show, while they should be under arrest.  They should be indicted by the Justice Department of the United States!  We cannot accept the fact that those parties and the FBI answer to no one.    
When you consider this, the American people are only recognized for what taxes they pay, and what political party they support.  If they are Conservatives and support President Trump, they automatically have a target on their backs.  Rogue radicals who dislike President Trump, and who refuse to accept their Left-wing queen, Hillary Clinton, did not make it to the White House have one thing in common.
They want to attack Trump supporters and Conservatives.  The hate is so palpable, one can almost touch it. Just like the Antifa movement threatens to oust President Trump and Vice President Pence, these types of threats are un-American.  These things are not supposed to happen in this Country, and Americans are facing unprecedented violence and disruption in our lives now.  
We have just experienced two terrorist attacks, and I will call them “terrorist” attacks. Any being, who can mow down a group of innocent people attending a Country Western concert and a group of Baptists attending their prayer meeting, is a terrorist and a demonic entity.
If we do not uphold law and order in this Country, we will live and die in chaos.  We have some really top notch men and women in blue, who protect us every day with their own blood.  To allow a rogue force to control their lives is not acceptable.  They should be able to trust their leaders, as they make life and death decisions.
In other words, the American people must receive the respect and protection they deserve.  In knowing that no one is above the law, we can live our daily lives in confidence as law abiding citizens.   
Right now, the Russia investigation lead by Special Counselor Mueller is rogue.  That is the bottom line.  
www.weatherforddemocrat.com/opinion/columns/after-trump-dossier-revelation-fbi-is-next/article_9af8a73e-10cc-5a1a-b34b-de4715f416b9.html QUOTE
When the Post story broke, some journalists noted that Democrats involved in the story had been lying about their role. “When I tried to report this story, Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias pushed back vigorously, saying ‘You (or your sources) are wrong,’” tweeted the New York Times’ Ken Vogel. “Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year,” added the Times’ Maggie Haberman.
Yes, they did. But the importance of the Democrats’ involvement in the dossier is that it could be one step on the road to a bigger story. What did the FBI do with the dossier material? Did judges make surveillance decisions in the Trump-Russia investigation based in whole or in part on the dossier?
To what degree is the “salacious and unverified” dossier the source of what we think we know about allegations of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign?
In the end, a House subpoena squeezed the information out of the key players in the who-funded-the-dossier side of the story.
But so far, the FBI has been much harder to crack.
Byron York is chief political correspondent for The Washington Examiner. END OF QUOTE
So just what is going on today in Mueller’s investigation?  www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/nov/7/trump-dossier-use-by-fbi-decried-by-carter-page-in/ QUOTE
The congressional testimony of Trump-Russia figure Carter Page shows that a Democratic-financed dossier can dominate how FBI agents question witnesses.
Mr. Page testified Nov. 2 before the House intelligence committee, which released a transcript Monday evening.
Rep. Trey Gowdy, South Carolina Republican, was particularly interested in how the FBI is conducting its probe of supposed Russian collusion with the Trump campaign.
“So what were the questions the FBI had for you?” Mr. Gowdy said.
“It was an extensive series of many meetings, but they, you know, the core foundation, I would say, in terms of the overall structure in March 2017, was related to those false allegations from the ‘dodgy’ dossier,” Mr. Page said, using his moniker for the anti-Trump document.
He said the dossier and associated investigations have ruined his energy firm. He has no business income, he said, and is living off investments as he worries about death threats and moves around a lot.
For months Republicans have tried to learn the extent to which then-FBI director James B. Comey relied on the dossier to open and conduct an investigation of the Trump campaign in the summer of 2016. For example, did Mr. Steele’s unverified charges underpin the FBI’s request for eavesdropping warrants?
Mr. Comey refused to discuss the dossier in open testimony.
Last week, the FBI provided classified documents requested by House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes, California Republican. A spokesman said the information remains classified and is not releasable.
The FBI has had Mr. Page under surveillance to the point of following him around New York.  END OF QUOTE
Fourteen days before President Trump took the oath of office, the Obama administration’s intelligence chiefs made public a unanimous assessment claiming Russian operatives, under orders from President Vladimir Putin, had orchestrated an influence campaign to help Mr. Trump win the presidential contest.
It was a watershed moment: the CIA, National Security Agency and FBI challenging the legitimacy of a U.S. presidential victory.
“Watershed moment?”  How can the United States Judicial System allow such a moment to go unchecked under the circumstances I have presented in this report?  
If this unprecedented “watershed moment” is allowed to go down in history as it is, the law in this  Country will become extinct as will all law abiding citizens.
Pray for the United States of America and for all those who dwell there.

Published on Oct 25, 2017
Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee helped fund the so-called Steele dossier, which said Russia could potentially blackmail then-candidate Donald Trump if he became president. Ed Schultz, host of “News with Ed,” tells RT America’s Anya Parampil that funding revelations prove the material is not credible.