Is the US Turning Into The Soviet Union?

Sharing is Caring!

by Daniel Carter
Almost thirty years ago, the Soviet Union came to a dramatic end. Decades of atrocious economic, social and foreign policy eroded the country’s standing in the world until it completely collapsed. Now, the US – once the most formidable rival of the Soviet Union – seems to be following in their footsteps. Will the US empire end in collapse as well?
This week, former presidential candidate and hero of the liberty movement, Ron Paul, said that he thinks the US is on the verge of a Soviet style collapse. In a recent interview with the Washington Examiner, Paul said:
“We’re on the verge of something like what happened in ‘89 when the Soviet system just collapsed. I’m just hoping our system comes apart as gracefully as the Soviet system.”
Ron Paul’s prediction is quite ominous, but I happen to believe that he is on to something. In 1984, Yuri Bezmenov, a former KGB propagandist, appeared on national television with a startling message. He said that ever since the Cold War between the US and Soviet Union started, the Soviet Union was actively brainwashing young American students into being sympathetic to Marxist/Communist ideas. Those young students are now professors, politicians, military personnel, entertainers and business people. They are now implementing Marxist/Communist ideals at the highest levels of the nation. It does not take more than a quick glance at mainstream thought to see the overwhelming influence of the Soviet Union’s propaganda in action. Below is the truly shocking interview. It’s well worth the 13 minutes of your time.

 
The same ideas that brought down the Soviet Union are now engrained in our foreign policy, economy and social life. For example, one of the most decisive blows to the Soviet Union was their recklessly expansive foreign policy. From 1979 to 1989, the Soviets tried to expand into the Middle East with the Soviet-Afghan War. This war dragged on far too long and cost far too much money. Eventually, the debts from the war caused the Soviet Union to go bankrupt. If this sounds familiar, it’s because the US is currently making the exact same mistake. The Soviet Military Industrial Complex helped ruin their nation, and now, the US Military Industrial Complex is about to ruin ours.
The US has also followed the disastrous economic policy of the Soviet Union. The US is still a market-based system, but we are moving quickly towards a top-down, centrally planned economy. One of the biggest similarities between the US and the Soviet Union is their overbearing central banking systems. The Soviets abandoned the gold standard (like the US) to inflate their monetary base. This allowed them to redistribute wealth from the producers to the government. Again, this should sound familiar. The US has destroyed the purchasing power of the US Dollar over several decades while enriching the establishment.
The Marxist/Communist influence on our social lives is becoming more evident every day. Society is being torn apart; separated into oppressed and oppressor classes. In the eyes of these demented Marxists, whites are oppressing people of color, men are oppressing women, straight people are oppressing LGBT people and so on. If these tensions keep rising, we could find ourselves in a similar situation as the Russians in the early 1900’s or the Chinese in the mid 1900’s. These two incidences led to the most murderous times in human history.
The Soviet Union’s brainwashing techniques worked. Even though the Soviet Union no longer exists, their ideas still permeate American society. The Marxist/Communist ideas have led to disaster in every society they have infiltrated. Is the US turning into the Soviet Union? Will our nation collapse as well? Only time will tell, but we should not take these developments lightly.

2,127 views

45 thoughts on “Is the US Turning Into The Soviet Union?

    • Cold war? The Soviet Union doesn’t exist anymore. This article is about Marxist ideas influencing American society. The modern fued between the US and Russia is something entirely different.

  1. This has to be the dumbest article on IWB in months. Stupid, blame Marx-Lenin-Socialism-Communism, what a load of cr*p.
    The game plan is not Russian!
    500 years b.C. the Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu formulated the principle of subversion this way :
    1. Cover with ridicule all of the valid traditions in your opponent’s country.
    2. Implicate their leaders in criminal affairs and turn them over to the scorn of their populace at the right time.
    3. Disrupt the work of their government by every means.
    4. Do not shun the aid of the lowest and most despicable individuals of your enemy’s country.
    5. Spread disunity and dispute among the citizens.
    6. Turn the young against the old.
    7. Be generous with promises and rewards to collaborators and accomplices.
    The enemy is not foreign, it is not another ‘…ism’
    “The issue which has swept down the centuries
    and which will have to be fought sooner or later
    is the people versus the banks.”
    Lord Acton

    • The REAL ENEMY is the ZioCON Communist DUAL CITIZENS that have hijacked our government. Putin BANNED them from the Russian government and the USA must do the same. Let them go live in Israel.

    • This has to be one of the dumbest comments I’ve ever read on IWB.
      Principals of subversion can be found well before 500BC in Babylon, Sumer and Egypt. As for Marx-Lenin-Socialism-Liberalism Communism Maoism… these are social subversion weapons not political, Private Banks fund and control these “ism”. Anyone with half a brain and a little historical knowledge knows this.
      “Mark this well, you proud men of action! you are, after all, nothing but unconscious instruments of the men of thought.” – Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Father of 19th and 20th century Subversion principals

      • Thank you could you please provide a source for your comment on Sumer and Babylon?
        “Marx-Lenin-Socialism-Liberalism Communism Maoism… these are social subversion weapons ” would you care to explain how these are social and not political, perhaps you use different definitions to everyone else.
        ‘ Private Banks fund and control these “ism”.’ , ‘Anyone with half a brain and a little … knowledge’ would realise that that is exactly what I said.
        Hegel, you claim is the ‘Father’ of Gobbledegook. Which principals are you referring to as 19th – 20th century subversion?
        What is 19th and 20th century subversion and who exactly are these principals?
        What possible relevance does Hegel’s quote have to either the article or my comment?

        • Sumer and Babylon First to introduce class warfare (Land Ownership)
          Ism are social weapons capitalized upon to bring down any and all political and or economic system regardless. Marxism brought down The monarchy, Environmentalism bring down Capitalism.
          and I quote.: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about? Maurice Strong,Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations
          Interview 1992.
          Private Banks fund and control these “ism”.’ , ‘Anyone with half a brain
          and a little … knowledge’ would realise that that is exactly what I
          said. No you didn,t this is what you stated:
          “The issue which has swept down the centuries
          and which will have to be fought sooner or later
          is the people versus the banks.” people Vs banks not Private Banks fund and control people
          19th – 20th century subversion = Hegelian Dialectics
          What is 19th and 20th century subversion and who exactly are these principals? One only needs to look at the western political environment and social order to see Hegel’s dialectics at work.
          What possible relevance does Hegel’s quote have to either the article or my comment? Your funny or Naive PJLondon I’ll let you choose

          • So ‘Principals of subversion in Sumer and babylon’ you have no source no evidence. Merely your opinion. Both were monarchies and no evidence of ‘subversion’ at all.
            First ‘land ownership’ again no evidence.
            The ‘ism’ in fact are economic models used to define the ownership of economic resources. Nothing to do with the ‘social models.
            Your ignorance of other events is equally monumental. The Russian revolution 1905 did not get rid of the monarchy and no one had heard of Marx or Engels.
            Marx ‘s revolution specifically called for a revolution against the bourgeois, (the middle class and industrialists) not the monarchs. It was ‘Capital’ that was the issue not class. His book was titled ‘This is Capital’ not ‘This is Class’ dummy.
            WTF “Environmentalism’? At least you get the ‘mental’ part, completely off subject.
            Your comment on ‘banks’ – Private Banks etc is not even in English.
            However it does confirm that you have no knowledge and less than half a brain.
            ’19th – 20th century subversion = Hegelian Dialectics’ Well if you say so, 7 billion people disagree. The rest of us think that it is a method of philosophical argument, nothing to do with ‘subversion’.
            ‘What is 19th and 20th century subversion and who exactly are these principals? ‘ so you cannot answer and have no clue.
            A penultimate word :
            Eclesiastes 1:17,18
            Be not rash with thy mouth, and let not thine heart be hasty to utter {any} thing before God: for God {is} in heaven, and thou upon earth: therefore let thy words be few.
            A final word to one who obviously works very hard :
            “We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.” — Benjamin Franklin

          • There are many cultural lies in your above statement, like most slaves you need to be re-educated but you’re not interested in facts your just interested in what so ever fits your groupthink perception
            “Mark this well, you proud men of action! you are, after all, nothing but unconscious instruments of the men of thought.”
            Marx didn’t write Capital he somewhat contributed, long before Capital was printed Marx had passed away. The vast majority of Capital as well as many of Marxs work were written by German Industrialist, social scientist, political theorist, philosopher, Friedrich Engels who was greatly influenced by Hegelian Dialectics.
            Marx was a Western Globalist poster child not a thinker.

          • Please change your name to Humpty Dumpty
            “When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’??’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’?
            ‘Cultural lies’!!! you do not know English.
            You have not given a single fact in any of your comments, Merely mouthed either platitudes plain falsehoods.
            Marx didn’t write ‘Das Kapital’? Are you F*ng insane? He wrote every word.
            It was published in 1863 and he died in 1883!
            Good grief are you really that stupid? One can forgive ignorance but really!
            Why not try and understand what was happening in Europe at that time and then you could study ‘How much, did Marx and Engels influence one another in developing their early thought? Both seem to have come independently to their remarkable identical doctrines. Perhaps this is why their friendship was able to continue with an almost complete absence of intellectual friction – neither had swayed the other into his deep belief in any major dogma. Their early writing often reveals differences in methodological emphasis, but there is almost no place in which either contradicts the opinions of the other. They seem interested in parallel topics, however differently developed, and their evaluative judgments are the same.’
            Marx was – is one of the world’s greatest philosophers. Of course you have never read a single word that he wrote and therefore are an expert.
            ‘Marx’s interest in the dialectical method is revealed much more clearly in his “Critique of Hegelian Dialectic and Philosophy As a Whole”, published at the end of his Economic and Philosophic Documents of 1844. By the time he published these manuscripts, he had read Engels’ “Outline” and the British economists, and his discussions of economics show a careful fusion of economic studies with philosophical argument.’
            He has been trashed in the west because the Russians and the Chinese love him. They actually study what he said and can see the truths contained in his works.
            ‘Marx was a Western Globalist poster child’ do you have any thoughts that are not slogans?
            Do you have any thoughts?

    • ok, ‘lord acton’ since your being so ‘pointed’ in your reply… exactly who owns the banks? communism wasn’t and isn’t Russian, it’s jewish.

      • Who owns the banks?
        “There is no longer any such thing as a monolithic House of Rothschild with connections to any significant number of all the scores of today’s independent Rothschild business ventures. The closest thing is Rothschilds Continuation Holdings AG, a Swiss company that manages interests in many Rothschild-founded institutions. There are no longer any Rothschild family members on its board (the last having retired in 2011), though about eight Rothschilds are believed to own stakes in it (like many holding companies, it’s privately held, so its records are not public). Its other owners include Rabobank and Hong Kong based Jardine Mathieson Holdings. (HSBC) Singapore is the centre of the world’s money and the City the centre of operations.
        HSBC alone is holding Quadrillions of dollars on it’s books.
        Jardine Mathieson is one of it’s largest shareholders (Crown Estates has more than a Quadrillion deposited).
        I have worked for both and there is not a jew in sight.
        All the tags, Capitalism, Socialism, Communism are merely descriptions of distribution, meaningless. If Communism is so terrible, such a failure, how-come China will soon be the world’s largest economy?
        Banks used to (in Rothschilds day) be distributors of saved wealth and by charging interest they became powerful. By moving Credit (into Fiat money) and distancing it from ‘wealth’, today’s banks don’t need capital and can do anything they can get away with.
        Basel I, II and III were intended to restore capital constraints. Did not even get off the ground.
        Finally the world has realised that Crypto currency is the same as any other. Totally worthless.
        ‘NY Post columnist Cindy Adams stated in no uncertain terms that former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger predicted the end of the nation of Israel in 10 years.’ Jews are cat’s paws for change. A target for the world’s hatred, not that they do not earn the hatred.
        ‘So you see, my dear Coningsby, that the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes. ‘
        – Benjamin Disraeli, British Prime Minister
        (1804-1881)
        “There is something behind the Throne greater than the King himself.”
        Sir William Pitt (1708-78)

        • PJ London
          “All the tags, Capitalism, Socialism, Communism are merely
          descriptions of distribution, meaningless.”
          You’ve excluded a few terrible tags, there in your simple ‘distribution’,
          democide,
          genocide.
          “We can, however, get a
          probable order of magnitude and a relative approximation of these deaths within
          a most likely range. And that is what the figures in Table 1 are meant to
          be. Their apparent precision is only due to the total for most communist
          governments being the summation of dozens of subtotals (as of forced labor
          deaths each year) and calculations (as in extrapolating scholarly estimates of
          executions or massacres).
          With this understood,
          the Soviet Union appears the greatest megamurderer of all, apparently killing
          near 61,000,000 people. Stalin himself is (and his jews, ynet, 2006) responsible for almost 43,000,000 of
          these. Most of the deaths, perhaps around 39,000,000 are due to lethal forced
          labor in gulag and transit thereto. Communist China up to 1987, but mainly from
          1949 through the cultural revolution, which alone may have seen over 1,000,000
          murdered, is the second worst megamurderer. Then there are the lesser
          megamurderers, such as North Korea and Tito’s Yugoslavia.
          Obviously the population
          that is available to kill will make a big difference in the total democide, and
          thus the annual percentage rate of democide is revealing. By far, the most
          deadly of all communist countries and, indeed, in this century by far, has been
          Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge. Pol Pot and his crew likely killed some
          2,000,000 Cambodians from April 1975 through December 1978 out of a population
          of around 7,000,000. This is an annual rate of over 8 percent of the population
          murdered, or odds of an average Cambodian surviving Pol Pot’s rule of slightly
          over just over 2 to 1.
          In sum the communists probably have murdered something like 110,000,000, or near two-thirds of all
          those killed by all governments, quasi-governments, and guerrillas from 1900 to
          1987. Of course, the world total itself it shocking. It is several times the
          38,000,000 battle-dead that have been killed in all this century’s
          international and domestic wars. Yet the probable number of murders by the
          Soviet Union alone–one communist country– well surpasses this cost of war.
          And those murders of communist China almost equal it. {snip} Communism has been
          the greatest social engineering experiment we have ever seen. It failed utterly
          and in doing so it killed over 100,000,000 men, women, and children, not to
          mention the near 30,000,000 of its subjects that died in its often aggressive
          wars and the rebellions it provoked. But there is a larger lesson to be learned
          from this horrendous sacrifice to one ideology. That is that no one can be
          trusted with power. The more power the center has to impose the beliefs of an
          ideological or religious elite or impose the whims of a dictator, the more
          likely human lives are to be sacrificed. This is but one reason, but perhaps
          the most important one, for fostering liberal democracy.”
          https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM
          Or this source. “U.S.S.R.: 20 million deaths; China: 65 million deaths;
          Vietnam: 1 million deaths; North Korea: 2 million deaths; Cambodia: 2 million
          deaths: Eastern Europe: 1 million deaths; Latin America: 150,000 deaths;
          Africa: 1.7 million deaths; Afghanistan: 1.5 million deaths; The international
          Communist movement and Communist parties not in power: about 10,000 deaths… The
          total approaches 100 million people killed.”
          https://sites.fas.harvard.edu/~hpcws/asreview.htm
          If you have probs w/their numbers, take it up w/them.
          as to..
          “I have worked for both and there is not a jew in sight.”
          fallacy……all/none…….you think they hang out w/the help? their non-visibility does not constitute proof of non-involvement.
          Stalin’s Jews https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

          • What on earth are you jabbering about?
            The terms Communism, Capitalism and Socialism were in use long before the Russian or Chinese revolutions.
            The actions of the communist parties are nothing to do with the economic models.
            Are you blaming the millions killed by Capitalist countries on the Capitalism economic system?
            With regard to the second comment, I was referring to HSBC and to Jardine Mathieson.
            Of 16 JM directors, 1 is possibly of Jewish origin or faith. In daily operations it is very difficult to find a jewish person.
            HSBC Again ostensibly no Jewish people on the main board and few at management level.
            Incidentally, you will find the same with companies like Anglo American, Started and 90% jewish owned to begin with, they are now almost entirely English (European and American) owned and run. The shareholdings are major Arab and Chinese conglomerates and sovereign funds, but you have to look hard to find a jewish face at any level.
            I despise Jewish society and Zionism but to believe that they are in control is being brainwashed and silly.
            I have no idea what your problem is with understanding English but you should try harder.

          • “to
            believe that they are in control is being brainwashed and silly.” you’re the only one to ‘jabberingly’ state that, in our replies.. just now.
            i understand English quite well. you’re rhetorical tactics, nor your ad hominem are impressive. and more to the point, the original comment wasn’t addressed to you unless lord acton is a sock puppet of yours.

          • “kikz2 PJ London • 15 hours ago
            ok, ‘lord acton’ since your being so ‘pointed’ in your reply… exactly who owns the banks? communism wasn’t and isn’t Russian, it’s jewish.”
            but it is not addressed to me?
            I have no idea what your problem is with understanding English but you should try harder.

          • beg pardon, for my (emily la tella moment) initial error, PJ … quite telling that, even though the comment was clearly addressed to ‘lord acton’, you couldn’t resist rendering opine, instead of ignoring the comment. 🙂

    • agreed. The people who are actively involved in demonizing the left are deliberately confusing the subject and the terms to divert the attention of the sheeple from the real culprits: the Corporations who with the US government are robbing the US population blind. Yet they deliberately call the Corporate-Military-industrial complex Communist when it is nothing of the kind; it is nothing more than pure fascism.
      it’s NOT Communims/marxism thats the problem, it’s the big corporations who are the problem.

      • Jack London describes the perception of “the great mass of the people [who] still persisted in the belief that they ruled the country by virtue of their ballots,” when in reality, “the country was ruled by what were called political machines. At first the machine bosses charged the master capitalists extortionate tolls for legislation; but in a short time the master capitalists found it cheaper to own the political machines themselves and to hire the machine bosses.”
        As London wrote, “hired fighting men of the capitalists…ultimately developed into the Mercenaries of the Oligarchy.”

    • “[The] Bank of the United States… is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution…
      “An institution like this, penetrating by its branches every part of the Union, acting by command and in phalanx, may, in a critical moment, upset the government.
      “I deem no government safe which is under the vassalage of any self-constituted authorities, or any other authority than that of the nation, or its regular functionaries.
      “What an obstruction could not this bank of the United States, with all its branch banks, be in time of war! It might dictate to us the peace we should accept, or withdraw its aids. Ought we then to give further growth to an institution so powerful, so hostile?” –Thomas Jefferson to Albert Gallatin, 1803. ME 10:437

  2. With its police state, control of the media and its drive to put NATO troops on Russia’s border, the US has become the new Iron Curtain.

    • Exactly … Meet the New World (ZioCON/Communist) Order .. Once it is understood Communism and Zionism are both trees split from the same trunk and the same root system, the picture becomes clearer. Both had the same goal: World Domination. Which one won? Putin, a Christian, stopped the ZioCON/Communists (dual citizens) looting of Russia and, when he started to prosecute them, they fled to Israel. Today they’ve shifted their focus to the USA and, and in addition to looting the USA, they’re bringing their Iron Curtain police state down on us. Until Trump, at the risk of being called an anti-Semite, gets the courage to do what Putin did and toss the ZioCON/Communists (dual citizens) out of the US Government, the USA will continue its’ downhill slide and, if they ever get the guns, millions of Christians will die, just like they did to the Christians in Russia.

  3. Meet the New World (ZioCON/Communist) Order .. Once it is understood Communism and Zionism are both trees split from the same trunk and the same root system, the picture becomes clearer. Both had the same goal: World Domination. Which one won? Putin, a Christian, stopped the ZioCON/Communists (dual citizens) looting of Russia and, when he started to prosecute them, they fled to Israel. Today they’ve shifted their focus to the USA and, and in addition to looting the USA, they’re bringing their Iron Curtain police state down on us. Until Trump, at the risk of being called an anti-Semite, gets the courage to do what Putin did and toss the ZioCON/Communists (dual citizens) out of the US Government, the USA will continue its’ downhill slide and, if they ever get the guns, millions of Christians will die, just like they did to the Christians in Russia.

    • You hit that nail on the head. Ron Paul is a brilliant man, but he avoids the truth of the Zionist agenda. It was this agenda that sired the Soviet Union in the first place. It has dominated all US policy, beginning in 1913, as well. Ron Paul was correct in his wanting to audit the FED. If this was ever done we would find we have been robbed.

      • Exactly .. the sad part is very few people figure it out and understand the dual seedline and the FAKE JEWS Satan planted in God’s garden.

        • I think it was called the Serpent, a symbol commonly recognized as Satan. Some believe that original sin occurred when Satan seduced Eve and begot Caine. Adam’s first son Able was killed by Cain, and Cain was forced out of the garden to begin his seed-line the Jews. Jesus referred the Jews as the sons of Satan.

          • This is better understood when you read the “explanation” of the “Parable of the Tares” by Jesus Christ to His disciples. (right click) … https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/mat/13/36/s_942036
            Consider that Eve had twins. Cain was Satan’s child and Abel was Adam’s child. After Cain killed Abel, Cain went to the land of Nod and took a wife and developed his evil lineage. Seth replaced Abel as the lineage of God’s special people, the Jews. Once that is understood, the parable of the tares is clarified.
            The sad part is, because people are not taught that Biblical truth, the TRUE Jews get blamed for what the FAKE Jews do.

  4. Soviets created the “people’s court” to determine who was a good communist.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Purge#Moscow_Trials
    Nazis followed their lead with their own “people’s court”.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People's_Court_(Germany)
    Beefsteak Nazis were former communists who joined the nazi party.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beefsteak_Nazi
    Americans followed both with their own “people’s court”.
    Samuel Dickstein (February 5, 1885 – April 22, 1954) was a Democratic
    Congressional
    Representative from New York and a New York State Supreme Court
    Justice.
    He played a key role in establishing the committee that would
    become the House Committee on Un-American Activities, which he used to
    attack fascists, including Nazi sympathizers, and suspected communists. Authors Allen Weinstein and Alexander Vassiliev learned in 1999 that Soviet files indicate he was a paid agent of the NKVD.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Dickstein_(congressman)

  5. Ron Paul is essentially right (except even the USSR was not quite as corrupted as the Clinton/Bush USSA – the USSR didn’t do anything like 9/11, its foreign policy was less insanely aggressive and expansionist [while they had their Soviet/Afghan war, they didn’t invade Iraq, Syria, Libya and others at the same time], and probably even Pravda reported slightly more truthfully than the Clinton News Network or the Washington Compost. Also the USSR didn’t have the surveillance technology the USSA has today).
    There’s one missing component though — the CIA and other Western services played a bit of a role in the downfall of the USSR, providing assistance to dissidents, amplifying their voices and making the USSR look even worse than it was. I don’t see anyone doing that to the US government – in fact, international media don’t even dare tell the truth about Clinton/Bush corruption.
    Absent that factor, the collapse of the USSA will take a lot longer than the collapse of the USSR, and with the surveillance technology at their hands, they will lock up or “disappear” many more dissidents than the USSR did in its final stages.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.